Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, I had asked that we would allow the Premier to speak to the issue as he had requested. I was hopeful that he might be able to shed something new onto the report, or something that was not in the report or lacking.
Mr. Chairman, I must go back to what we see in the report. There has been no further information provided that would refute the findings of this report. As we have heard Members speak around this House about the credibility of government, Mr. Chairman, I must say when we first came here, we took an oath of office. We took an oath of office to perform our duties to the best of our abilities. Not only that, we were made very aware that we must not only keep the law but we must be seen to keep the law.
Mr. Chairman, the report puts out, in very plain, clear language, that we, as Members of this House, were concerned about when the supplementary appropriation bill came through here. We felt that we were not getting the responses that were required to bring this matter to conclusion. A motion went through this House, a majority of Members, to have this done. This is now done and it brings out very clearly the facts. The facts are not disputed. Senior staff were given an opportunity to refute the facts and that was not done.
Mr. Chairman, the report, as I said, is very clear. Some may find it difficult to mark things down in black and white. I do not think that should be a concern of us. I think we should try to make everything black and white so the people of the Northwest Territories know where we stand as the Government of the Northwest Territories. Let's not mix the colours and come up with grey and say, well, what if somehow, some way we will make it happen.
I am going to try to be civil about this, Mr. Chairman, about what we found in this report. I am very concerned, as I was when this thing first occurred. The Premier stated that it has been...some people are asking why are we still embroiled in this. I remember making a statement in this House, a fact that this could have concluded very early in the process by a couple of quick words, humble words, of apology to the people for the conduct of this government. But that was not taken in.
I am even more concerned with the facts, what the Premier stated in his comments. I will want to review that in unedited Hansard, because he seems to be contradicting what has been said in the past in this House.
Mr. Speaker, this report states about the level of pay of one of the individuals -- two individuals, but one specifically of such an excess overpayment, and at what level they should have been paid. For months and months we were told in this House that that was in fact not a deputy minister position, but an executive assistant position. If that is the case, then the findings of the report are accurate, and it is past the 11th hour, Mr. Chairman -- not the 11th hour, but past the 11th hour, past midnight, in the darkness of night, I guess one can say, the fact that a letter went back to the Auditor General to say, "Wait a second, you misinterpreted. Here's a couple of clauses that should have been read." Now we are hearing in this House that in fact, that was a deputy minister position.
It further adds to my very serious concern of the credibility of this government.
Once again, there is no refuting of the facts here. Once again, in the Auditor General's report, as part of the report, appendices were clauses from the termination agreements of the employee contracts that were initially signed. When we asked the Auditor General in our meeting if it was normal when a termination negotiation took place that there was substantial change from the termination agreement in those contracts, we were told no, that this instance, it was highly unusual. Now, there is opportunity and Members are saying, "Well, let's fix this. Let's put in some rules and regulations. Let's make a new policy and tighten this up. We will not do this again."
Mr. Chairman, the simple matter of fact is policies that were in place were not adhered to -- I repeat, were not adhered to. So putting a new policy or regulation in place, what does that do? Does that fix the situation? No, it does not fix the situation. It does not bring back into the light our concerns that this government has done things that were not appropriate, that went outside the bounds.
In the report, we were told that the chief of staff position was not in fact done away with because there is no decision. They were just pointed out that, well, we were told the chief of staff position did not show up in the next business plan organization chart. Would that be because maybe that position did not legally exist to begin with, as I questioned in this House? It did not fall into the Public Service Act? Maybe that's how simple it was to get rid of it. It just showed up, it can just disappear.
Mr. Chairman, we have power in this House, and a lot of responsibility comes with that power. Ultimate authority comes to this House for the laws that we tell citizens, rich and poor, that they have to follow.
Mr. Chairman, we have to follow the responsibility of those laws by showing that we will adhere to our own rules and regulations, that we will follow the rules of the land we put in place. To try and stand up in this House to say that this is just a minor slip-up, that we can fix it with some paperwork and more writing, in grey ink, that we will fix the rest of this country, this Northwest Territories. We would fall far short of the expectations of good government, Mr. Chairman. And I go back and remind Members that when we came into this House, when we were sworn in, we swore to do the job to the best of our abilities, to follow the rules. We are all aware that not only are we to follow the letter of the law, we are to be seen to follow the letter of the law, Mr. Chairman.
I must say that for somebody who has had as much experience in this setting, as a Member of the Legislative Assembly, as a Member of the Executive Council since he became a Member of this government many years ago, that that still seems not to be able to register from what I have heard today. It is not registering.
That is very concerning to me, that the actions that were taken were still not considered to be bad. It is clear in this report. We finally got it received in this House, the information that we could not get from the Members opposite. I am very concerned that now as a government we are going to condone the actions by saying, wait a second we have a year left, let's hold on to the ship here. I ask Members, is there a ship to hold on to? I would rather say that we do not have enough bailing cans to bail this thing out so we can stay afloat. If we are not willing to take the challenge to show the people of the Northwest Territories that there is good government here, that we are willing to stand up and represent them, rich and poor.
I say, Mr. Chairman, that my interest when we started this was on the conduct of accountable government. By this report it only confirms my concerns with accountable government and the lack of. I say that we had better be willing to act on this. We had better be willing to show the people of the Northwest Territories that we are here to do a job and a credible job. We hear about what happens if someone goes to Ottawa to go for money, or what does happen when we stand there and behave like a third world country and say, we do not care about our laws, we're going to do our thing anyway. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.