Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, Public Works and Services has never done that, as far as I know. The people who have been reviewing BIP may have done it, and they may have that information. Thank you.
Debates of June 17th, 2002
This is page numbers 799 - 832 of the Hansard for the 14th Assembly, 5th Session. The original version can be accessed on the Legislative Assembly's website or by contacting the Legislative Assembly Library. The word of the day was chairman.
Topics
Further Return To Question 270-14(5): Cost Of The Business Incentive Policy
Question 270-14(5): Cost Of The Business Incentive Policy
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 807
Further Return To Question 270-14(5): Cost Of The Business Incentive Policy
Question 270-14(5): Cost Of The Business Incentive Policy
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 807

The Speaker Tony Whitford
Thank you, Mr. Minister. Item 6, oral questions. The honourable Member for North Slave, Mr. Lafferty.
Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 807
Leon Lafferty North Slave
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is for the Premier, the Honourable Stephen Kakfwi. A proposal was submitted to the federal government without the knowledge or the input of Regular Members. Two Cabinet Ministers chose the routes for the proposal and I would like to ask the Premier why he chose the route that goes on the Ingraham Trail over the Dogrib region? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 807
Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 807

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I will refer the question to the Minister of Transportation, Mr. Handley.
Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 807

The Speaker Tony Whitford
Thank you. The honourable Premier is referring the question to the Minister of Transportation, Mr. Handley.
Return To Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 807

Joe Handley Weledeh
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The reason that route was chosen is our proposal, called Corridors for Canada, looks at two corridors, one into the mining area and one into the oil and gas area. The only current route into the mining area is through Highway No. 4, Tibbitt Lake and up into the area. There is no road through the Dogrib area. There is not any agreement that I have right now from the chiefs to even build a road through that area, although we did take some steps to set up a steering committee to begin looking at it. We could not include that as an alternate route when there was no agreement to have one. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Return To Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 807
Supplementary To Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 807
Leon Lafferty North Slave
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question was for the Premier. I already asked this question to the Transportation Minister on Friday. The routes would facilitate community resupply and intercommunity travel for the Sahtu region. I would like my communities to have the same opportunities. I would like to ask the Premier, why did he not choose the Dogrib region so we could also have the same benefits? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Supplementary To Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 807

The Speaker Tony Whitford
Thank you, Mr. Lafferty. The honourable Premier, Mr. Kakfwi. I have to direct it to you.
Further Return To Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 807

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, as the Minister of Transportation has indicated, we have to expect that the federal government is not going to be that receptive to totally financing new roads, especially into areas where there is already existing infrastructure. In our case, the Ingraham Trail is there, it is being used by industry and it is an existing road. What we have indicated is we want to rebuild and make sure it continues to have the proper maintenance for access into the mining area that requires this service. We believe that is something that is perfectly rational and can be substantiated to the federal government. This is what our proposal had indicated. Thank you.
Further Return To Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 807
Supplementary To Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 807
Leon Lafferty North Slave
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I am glad they used the word existing because there is no road existing past Tibbitt Lake right now and there was not one two weeks ago either. So now it is the Dogrib region versus the Ingraham Trail. We can put a winter road through the Dogrib region or an all-weather road to the mines. I would like to ask them, when they can consider a Tuktoyaktuk road, why do they keep using the word existing? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Supplementary To Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 807
Further Return To Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 807

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. As we have indicated, the Dogrib chiefs had been invited to work through a committee to look at the issues of building infrastructure within their region. This committee has not been active. In fact, I do not know that it has even been activated. In the meantime, time was of the essence. When the federal government indicated they were interested in seeing us put a proposal forward in very short order, we took literally about two weeks and built on what we think is a well-substantiated, rational argument for getting infrastructure dollars to enhance, maintain and improve our existing infrastructure. In large part, this is the proposal that we put forward. As Members who have travelled with us to Ottawa have indicated, it is being well received. It is seen as a well-substantiated proposal. Thank you.
Further Return To Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 808
Supplementary To Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 808
Leon Lafferty North Slave
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Some of these plans have been kicking around since 1997 and 1998, so three weeks is not a time limit that they should be using. I would like to ask the Premier, why did he not consult with the Dogrib chiefs? If he did, he would have found out why. I would like to ask him, why did he not consult with them?
Supplementary To Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 808
Further Return To Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Item 6: Oral Questions
June 16th, 2002
Page 808

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, the Minister of Transportation, Mr. Handley, is the lead Minister responsible for transportation infrastructure. He developed a draft proposal that was brought to Cabinet and Cabinet had since endorsed this. We believe by and large that it is supported by the general public and we will continue to use it as a basis for trying to lever some money out of Ottawa to ensure that we get some help to fix the roads, to improve on them and to enhance the present condition of these roads. We believe that once Ottawa makes a decision, hopefully they will allocate all the money to us that we are requesting. It would be unfortunate if they give us just a portion of it. Of course, we will expect to be consulting with the Members of the Legislature about the final allocation of these dollars. Thank you.
Further Return To Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Question 271-14(5): Highway Infrastructure Development Proposal
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 808

The Speaker Tony Whitford
Thank you, Mr. Premier. Item 6, oral questions. The honourable Member for Hay River South, Mrs. Groenewegen.
Question 272-14(5): Appointment To The Hay River Health And Social Services Board
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 808

Jane Groenewegen Hay River South
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, my questions today are for the Minister of Health and Social Services. The Hay River Community Health and Social Services Board finds itself in a unique situation at this time. Hay River was, for many years, somewhat of an anomaly with health services being delivered under contract, most recently with the Town of Hay River. That contract no longer exists. Every other health board consists of members appointed by the Minister on the advice and recommendation of the MLAs, local governments, aboriginal governments, et cetera.
Today, there is an opening on the health board in Hay River. I want to know, who is going to have a say in the appointment to that vacancy? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Question 272-14(5): Appointment To The Hay River Health And Social Services Board
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 808

The Speaker Tony Whitford
Thank you, Mrs. Groenewegen. The honourable Minister responsible for Health and Social Services, Mr. Miltenberger.
Return To Question 272-14(5): Appointment To The Hay River Health And Social Services Board
Question 272-14(5): Appointment To The Hay River Health And Social Services Board
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 808

Michael Miltenberger Thebacha
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, it is my understanding that there was an ad placed in the paper for the public to submit names. The Member is right, the board in Hay River is an anomaly. It is from the Societies Act. At this point, we are in a state of transition as we move to a standard nomination process for the health authorities across the Northwest Territories.
It would be my hope that people with the common interest of having the best service possible and the best people on the board, there would be consultation with the board, the mayor, and the MLAs so they can get a full look at the names being submitted and the best name chosen. Thank you.
Return To Question 272-14(5): Appointment To The Hay River Health And Social Services Board
Question 272-14(5): Appointment To The Hay River Health And Social Services Board
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 808
Supplementary To Question 272-14(5): Appointment To The Hay River Health And Social Services Board
Question 272-14(5): Appointment To The Hay River Health And Social Services Board
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 808

Jane Groenewegen Hay River South
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I would like to ask the Minister, how long will Hay River be in this state of transition? Mr. Speaker, we have some really serious concerns about the delivery of health and social services in Hay River right now, so it is very, very important who is on that board and who chairs that board.
Although I could refer to what the Minister said about taking a collective approach to this, I would like something more definitive from the Minister. How long is Hay River going to be in this state of transition? Thank you.