Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, the principle of the Tlicho land claims and self-government agreement is a good one. For years aboriginal people in the Northwest Territories and across Canada have been working to negotiate, along with their claims, self-government. Being that the principle is a good one, Mr. Speaker, is one thing, but our duty as legislators in this House I find myself in a bit of a predicament here because I know the wishes of this government to bring this to fruition, to bring it back in this House to third reading and pass it in the life of this government.
We know that dissolution happens on the 24th of October, and we're done. Mr. Speaker, we need to ask ourselves as legislators for all people in the Northwest Territories if the process we're going to step into, which has already been brought forward by our Cabinet, they've endorsed this and moved this and moved it ahead and taken all the considerations and concerns of Members, and in their wisdom thought that this is a step that needs to happen.
Mr. Speaker, there are questions we have to ask ourselves, and not only ourselves but on behalf of the residents we represent when it comes to this act. I believe that now that it is kicked into the public realm after first reading, and now after second reading it will go to committee and the committee will have to decide now as to what are the best steps for this bill. We've heard a number of Members already say we should bring it back and conclude it in the life of this session. We know our session ends on the 10th, unless we decided as an Assembly to extend those sitting days beyond the 10th up until possibly midnight, I guess, on the 24th.
It is a piece of legislation that is very significant, Mr. Speaker. Government may put this out as a small piece of legislation. There only are a small number of clauses in this bill, and that's true, but they are very significant and mean much, as we've talked about earlier, about the development of this Northwest Territories, the development of the people in the Northwest Territories, and what it means. Every agreement signed to date, there has been no piece to it that included a self-government provision. So this is a very big piece of legislation on that principle of self-government in the Northwest Territories.
Yes, we've heard that the federal government and the territorial government, that's our Cabinet, has signed off on this. The federal government's Cabinet has signed off on this and the Tlicho people have signed off on this and ratified it. This step, Mr. Speaker, that we are now coming to as a Government of the Northwest Territories is our government's way of bringing ratification to this bill. Is it appropriate that we take this and move it through at the pace that is being requested? In many minds, that is a very serious potential and outcome of this bill. Whether we have that debate amongst committee on a public hearing process, whether it's in the communities or have a very public debate in this House in Committee of the Whole, I think we have to give a full degree of attention to this bill and what it means to residents of the Northwest Territories. Once this is ratified, that means every agreement that has been signed to date, whether it was a self-government process or not or just a land claims process, those claims are going to have to have a clause in them that says anything given to one group, we shall benefit from as well. I know that's in the Inuvialuit one, that's in the Gwich'in one, and I'm sure that's in the Sahtu one.
As well, one has to say as a government, in our wisdom are we able to proceed to this stage and bring real effect to this bill, or is it a symbolic gesture, Mr. Speaker? I think as legislators we have to be sure that what we are doing is the right thing, not just for the sake of symbolism, but for bringing real legislation into this House and bringing it forward.
So, Mr. Speaker, in principle, it is a good bill. It will change the Government of the Northwest Territories and evolve to the next step, and we know there are many other claims in that process. I come from an area, the Beaufort-Delta, that is working on something in the area of self-government, as well, Mr. Speaker. So it is important that we deal with this as legislators in an open and transparent way. The residents of the Northwest Territories expect accountability from this government, and making sure that what we do is in the best interest of all people in the Northwest Territories. I know we'd like to do this and do it quickly for the benefit of the Tlicho people, and that's a very plausible thing. We need to look at that and see that in the light that it should be in. But, Mr. Speaker, I have a duty as a Member of the Legislative Assembly to all residents that I represent from my constituency, and until we have that public debate on this to the provisions of this and what it actually means...For example, what does clause 4 mean to the Government of the Northwest Territories, to the people of the Northwest Territories that I represent?
With that, Mr. Speaker, I would encourage that we get it to the public process. Committee, at this point, will have to decide if it's an on-the-road campaign in the sense of taking it out, or if we decide to bring it to this House for a review in Committee of the Whole. We must all be ready for the next stage to do due diligence. It's only what's expected of us by residents.
So in principle it's a good bill, and I would support getting this to the next stage, but I would have some serious questions that I hope the Cabinet, the Minister sponsoring this would have the appropriate answers as we go through that public process. Thank you.