Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, as well, I am torn on this issue. As Members have stated in this Assembly, harmonization was born out of an initiative of the 13th Assembly. Mr. Speaker, it might have been born out of the 13th Assembly, but it would have been nurtured or malnourished, in a sense, in the 14th Assembly. It is an initiative that I think in principle is the right way to go for all residents in the Northwest Territories. But it also has to meet certain criteria and the message has to get out to individuals across the North, how they will be impacted.
I think that we've tried to put too much in one basket. We've tried to correct all the wrongs in one way and that is difficult to do. I have to hand it to the Ministers who have been involved in this at this time. They initially heard from the Members, they went back to the drawing board and tried to do a few things and as of just recently, made some more adjustments to try to address concerns of Members of this House. Mr. Speaker, I can agree in principle with what the government is trying to do, but I cannot agree with what might be put in place if this harmonization package goes ahead as is.
Mr. Speaker, I will point out some examples from my constituency of what happens. It's different from a constituency that has all public housing, whereas, in my community, it's split. I have a large private market and there is public housing. Mr. Speaker, the income being calculated is going to take in a number of avenues such as sewing and selling of meat, which we traditional harvesters are still doing in my constituency. If we have somebody winning a bingo, then that will be taken into consideration. That individual goes back into the income support office and says I made some money, I've sold some meat or I made some sewing money or there is bingo.
Mr. Speaker, I don't think those are being evenly applied across the board and that is my concern as well for my constituency. For example, the Inuvik town council took over the lottery provisions within our act and they've taken care of bingos in the community, and the way they work that arrangement is that every organization holding a bingo has to record who has won that bingo. The town collects that information so that it knows who's won prizes from what organization's bingo. Well, income support staff go over to the town office and is given information on who's won bingo, whether it was two people winning $100 or one person winning $10,000. They take that information and apply it so when the individual comes back the next month, having won $150 or $200, to apply and the money has been spent wisely or unwisely, that reduces the amount of income they'll have from income support.
Now I agree with that in principle to some extent. Somebody winning $1,000, $2,000, $5,000, or $10,000, should be able to pay their own way for a number of months. I agree with that, but can we be told that that standard will be applied in all communities in the Northwest Territories? I don't believe that's so, Mr. Speaker. I know it's so in my constituency, but do they record that in any other community? Do they record who's won the bingo and provide that information to the income support office in that community? I don't believe so. I've talked to individuals in my community who are quite closely connected to how things work in the social area.
Another concern, Mr. Speaker, that I have is the fact that in trying to address the concerns of Members in this House, they're treating seniors differently again. Those that are in housing right now will remain at the current level but, as of April 1st, new seniors coming in will be brought in at a different level. I have a concern with that because as disjointed as the system is today, we're going to add another joint that puts it a little more out of sync, as I see it, Mr. Speaker. We should treat seniors across the board evenly. Is it is going to be based on income? Is there going to be a certain amount that is going to be exempted before they start calculating rent? At least that is the way it is in housing and there is a certain amount of that for income support as well. So I think we need to look at how much we exempt but, by addressing it in two ways, saying that because a senior is in a housing unit before April 1st, he or she is going to be treated differently than somebody who comes into housing after April 1st, I have a concern with that. Even though we do have differences between seniors and single mothers, we are going to put another system in there that is going to put it a little further apart.
What is going to happen, Mr. Speaker, with students on student financial assistance right now, the system is if you are accepted to Arctic College programs, here in Yellowknife or Fort Smith, or in Inuvik, people in my constituency have to travel out of Inuvik. Right now, the policy is their housing unit can remain in their name and they're deducted $32. When they go out to school, a certain amount of the student financial assistance will be paid to Arctic College for the unit that they received in the program. Now we are going to put more emphasis on that income that is for student financial assistance and apply it to the rent back home. In some cases, there might be a slight drop, but there might be a bit of an increase if your partner or spouse gets a part-time job in that community. It is very disjointed right now and we need to somehow pull it together to make it a little bit more level.
That is why I say that, in principle, I agree with the harmonization initiative. But I've listened to the many questions raised and heard the responses, and some critical pieces of information are lacking. A lot of comments have been made about larger constituencies being well off, better than small communities. That's true to a certain degree because of the amount of resources in a larger community that is tax-based driven. However, Mr. Speaker, someone in my constituency who is in public housing right now, if they are evicted, they have to go the private market. The private market has no qualms about telling somebody you have to pay a certain amount. So an individual who used to pay rent at $32, now pays rent at $1,600. Where do they go?
They used to go to income support and say well I'm not in housing anymore and I need a place to stay and the government had this sort of check stop to say well, we can't let you be out in the cold, we're going to pay your full rent. Well, that has changed, Mr. Speaker, because right now anybody who has been in public housing that has been evicted from public housing for arrears, income support will only give them the amount of rent they were qualified for before. So if somebody qualified for public housing and is evicted and they were paying $32 a month, income support says, okay, good, we'll give $32 a month, now go find some accommodations. What happens after that, Mr. Speaker, is people start bunking with other family members, with friends, with just people in the community that will accept them for a night, so that they can have a warm place to sleep.
Mr. Speaker, we definitely have problems across the Territories. Even without any proposed changes, all members, I believe, have received a lot of calls regarding it. So on this harmonization initiative, as it stands, even with the amendments, I have difficulty supporting the harmonization initiative and feel there must be more work done to try to streamline some of the stuff. I believe it will be a reality, Mr. Speaker, and we can't keep going back to where we started before. We've had lots of time to try to put something together. It won't be acceptable to all groups, Mr. Speaker, but we are going to have to do something because the reality of the government, especially in the 15th Assembly, is that if the financial picture stands as it is, we are going to be in big trouble and some changes are going to have to occur. I hope as a result of some of these comments, the people who are writing these policies and putting these things in place will hear and try to address the concerns being raised so that when it comes forward again, it is brought forward with accurate information.
Mr. Speaker, I remember being to told about how seniors would receive a reduction, quite a large number, and I asked how a senior could receive a reduction when they don't pay any rent right now. Mr. Speaker, it is very difficult to try and make sense of this. I guess I'm coming from my constituents' perspective. If my constituents' bingo earnings are going to be calculated then I expect all constituencies across the North will be treated the same and their residents' bingo earnings will be calculated. I don't accept that we are further setting seniors against one another. So I think that we need to do some more work on this and try to bring it back again.
Maybe as the motion states, not until April 1, 2004. Maybe that is the appropriate time. The new government will be looking at its realities and it will give staff time to clear the air on this one and come back with something that can be agreed to by a majority of the Members. So, Mr. Speaker, even though I am torn on this one, I will be supporting the motion and I will be encouraging both departments to try to come back with something that addresses the concerns being raised here. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.