Thank you, Ms. Bisaro. To the motion. Mr. Dolynny.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I’d like to thank Premier Bob McLeod for bringing this motion here today. I would like to thank our seconder, Madam Groenewegen, for allowing this to be debated here today.

We’ve got a lot of dignitaries and guests here today. I want to earmark the fact that we have a lot of signatories here for the Devolution Agreement and I want to thank them for joining us here today, and we have a lot of other distinguished guests. I appreciate everyone taking time out of their schedule to be with us here.

We’ve heard the word “historic,” we’ve heard the word “epic,” and I think I am going to add the word “legacy” to the amount of adjectives we’ve heard about today’s events. We’ve also heard terminologies used, even today here and even in media. Is today more of a symbolic or is it more of a legally binding motion that we’re bringing to the floor of the House, and this is only a few people that can think in that capacity? I will answer that question, but I will do so later on in my delivery here today.

I do want to first and foremost commend the Premier. As mentioned by the seconder, it takes strong leadership, determination and will to guide an organization of this magnitude with so many moving parts, so many levers, and to create this focus and to provide the NWT with such a great opportunity. I want to commend and thank the Premier for his steadfast determination. It takes a lot of will, and thank you for doing so.

I realize there has been a lot of legal and technical work over the years, too many years to count, but I realize that there has been lots of work on things like the consistency of the terms used and all the provisions that were required to meet for us to debate today.

There are way too many champions out there for me to mention here today. They all know who they are, and I think, for myself as a Member here, I’m sure many speak in the same vein. We want to thank you for your devoted attention and help on this subject.

I further realize that there will be ongoing negotiations as we progress along the journey of devolution, and I view today, like many, as just one of those steps in moving forward on this journey. However, there are still some concerns out there. You’ve heard a few already today. Ms. Bisaro brought a few here, and I want to add a couple more.

In terms of observations that we note at this juncture, there is still grave concern on a number of waste sites this government may be responsible for, and so I hope that the residents of the NWT will be continually updated throughout this process. This has been very loud and clear through many of the negotiations and many of the consultation information sessions. Therefore, I challenge the Premier and his team to keep this issue in the forefront as we move through this journey over the next couple of months.

The other thing that has been kind of an issue for me personally, as well as a lot of my constituents, is – and again, right from the very beginning, I have made it quite clear – this government knows that I haven’t been a big fan of the 5 percent cap. Yet, in the same breath, I have been given some comfort, knowing that these shackles will be looked at at some time in the future as we become more productive in our resources and our resource extraction. Again, whether I’m still in office or not, I will keep watch on this one for sure, and I will hold the government of the day accountable, ensuring that the residents of the Northwest Territories will be keeping our fair share of royalties in the future.

Now I’d like to go back to my earlier question. Is this motion on devolution today symbolic or is this in some capacity a legally binding motion of the House? I would probably like to answer it probably this way: Are we prepared, as residents, to live

with the status quo? I think many here, and I think many residents have told us, I don’t think they are prepared to do so.

We also heard, is devolution being done at any cost? I don’t believe this is the case. I believe there has been a lot of effort, as I said earlier, and you will probably hear it from my colleagues today, a lot of effort has gone behind the case to support that. If one wants to believe we are symbolic in gesture today, this may be legally correct, but I’m sure historians will judge our voice today as having had direct significant political impact on its success.

Before I leave this topic, it’s been said by many, but it is worth repeating and I’d like to say this again, this was not the greatest deal of all time for the Northwest Territories, but it is a good deal for the NWT and I am confident that it will ensure our economic future in the years to come.

With that, I give my commitment to this House that I will be supporting this motion.

Thank you, Mr. Dolynny. To the motion. Mr. Moses.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would like to just begin by saying I’d like to thank the Premier and Madam Groenewegen for bringing this motion to the House. It is a very great motion and I’m very honoured to be speaking to it today.

Actually, I did make a Member’s statement earlier, at the beginning of the 17th Legislative Assembly,

on the history that this government’s been doing, and in a short time period – I think it was only in quite a few months – we started making some changes within this government and how things were done, and that that change continues to happen even today.

Twenty months ago the Legislative Assembly got together. We did have a meeting with the Aboriginal governments, which was never done before, and moving forward, working and strengthening those relationships and we see it here today. When this AIP was signed on, we had two Aboriginal governments that had signed on and now we have five. It is a big step for this government moving forward, not only for this government but for the Aboriginal governments, as well, and the residents of the Northwest Territories.

All that couldn’t have happened, as you’ve heard here today, without a very strong leadership, a strong Cabinet. At the beginning of this Assembly, when we moved forward, we voted the Executive in for a reason: for their experience, their knowledge and the work that they’ve done in the past. To be where we are today, that goes to show that the work that Cabinet and our Premier, Bob McLeod, have done.

Moving forward, as well, I’d like to offer a sincere thank you to my previous predecessor, the former

Premier and current mayor of Inuvik, Mr. Floyd Roland, who did take that big step for us as well…

---Applause

…to get the ball rolling and get the motions in action so that we can be here sitting today to debate this motion. I would also like to recognize and thank the hard work, dedication and commitment of the devolution team, which today just received a very prestigious award under the Premier’s Awards, under the leadership of the Premier as well. I know the work that they’ve done and the meetings that we’ve had with them has not gone unrecognized. We appreciate the work that they have done. There have been a lot of sacrifices and a lot of challenges that they have had to endure so that we can get the information and have the changes within the Devolution Agreement package to where it is today and looking forward to signing the final agreement.

I would also like to recognize the work of the previous governments. As Mrs. Groenewegen has said, every government that she has been part of, devolution has always been a discussion item. I’m glad that here today that I’m part of the 17th Legislative Assembly government and moving this forward, as well as the work of the Government of Canada. Once again, it couldn’t be here without the commitment and support of our Aboriginal governments who decided to take this on.

Speaking of that, I am very fortunate that in Inuvik, we do have two Aboriginal groups that they represent, we work with, we support with. I would ask them if they would like to say a few words. I would like to say a few words on their behalf, as well, in the House today. The Inuvialuit have been actively participating in devolution negotiations for over 20 years. We have two Members in here that can probably attribute to the work that they’ve been doing in working with them. They are looking forward and reviewing with the objective of improving the final devolution of land and resources later this summer. Paramount in this review is to ensure that the Inuvialuit Final Agreement on land and resource management system is not affected and are serious intergovernmental arrangements with the GNWT to build and improve the Inuvialuit Final Agreement system of protecting the environment and wildlife to meet the eye of the objectives. The Inuvialuit will be active participants in the implementation of the final agreement, and are preparing to engage the GNWT, and the federal government in particular, with the negotiations of the management of off-shore in the Beaufort Sea. Part of the preparation work is to use the resource revenues for the benefit of the Inuvialuit and work with GNWT to improve the social, cultural and economic conditions in our communities.

In September 2012, the GTC made an important commitment to all the residents of the NWT when it

decided to formally endorse the process to negotiate the present draft Devolution Agreement. The decision to support devolution was carefully considered by the GTC Board of Directors, and this decision was only made after the issue was addressed at the Gwich’in Annual General Assembly of last summer.

On behalf of the Gwich’in people, the GTC Board of Directors decided to support the negotiations of GNWT devolution for three reasons. First, the agreement will give the Aboriginal residents of the NWT more control over how their natural resources of the territory are used. Secondly, under this agreement, the Aboriginal residents of the NWT will gain a much greater share of financial benefits, linked to the use of these resources. Third, because, under this agreement, neither the financial benefits nor the chance of power to the GNWT will affect the Gwich’in Aboriginal Treaty rights. This includes the rights under the Gwich’in Comprehensive Land Claim Agreement and those rights, powers and financial terms linked to an eventual Gwich’in Self-Government Agreement.

The Gwich’in Tribal Council recognizes the work of devolution is not done once these negotiations are complete. In fact, the real work of devolution is just beginning. The GTC is committed to implementing a strong Devolution Agreement to realize the benefits of devolution for the Aboriginal and all residents of the NWT.

It is with these comments that the Gwich’in Tribal Council encourages all GNWT MLAs to support the present agreement and to vote in favour of the present draft so that the real work of implementing a strong Devolution Agreement can begin at once.

We have two Aboriginal groups in the Beaufort-Delta region who are strongly committed and supportive of this agreement. Being a representative of the community of Inuvik and the Aboriginal groups, and working with them and the great work that they’ve done to be where they are today, and this government where it is today, I will be in support of this motion.

I just want to leave off with a little quote here that says, “every long journey begins with the first step.” This motion today is that first step, it’s a momentous step in moving forward not only for this government and all Aboriginal governments but it’s a momentous step for the people of the Northwest Territories moving forward. We may not all be in the House 10 or 12 years from now, and we want to make sure that we instill and ensure that we have made the right decisions for our youth and our elders and people of the Northwest Territories moving forward. Thank you, and like I said, I will be in support of this motion today.

Thank you, Mr. Moses. To the motion, Mr. Blake.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. As we meet here today to vote on the Devolution Agreement with this motion, I believe that we have all found a common interest within our negotiations, which is very important in any negotiations.

This is a great long-term investment for the people of the Northwest Territories. When we first met here at the 17th Legislative Assembly, our vision was for

strong individuals, families and communities sharing the benefits and the responsibilities of a unified, environmentally sustainable and prosperous Northwest Territories. Another one of our main priorities was building a strong and sustainable future for our territory by strengthening our relationships with Aboriginal and other northern governments, and also negotiating and implementing our Devolution Final Agreement. I believe we have reached that goal and I will be supporting the motion today.

Also, I’d like to thank the Inuvialuit and the Gwich’in who have signed on as stakeholders with this AIP and also the other signatories that have also signed on. I look forward to the future when other Aboriginal groups also sign on. Thank you.

Thank you, Mr. Blake. To the motion. Mr. Menicoche.

Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. As my colleagues in this Assembly know, the job of an MLA is not an easy one. Our job is to represent the interests of our constituents and to build consensus, especially when you come from a constituency that is split on a matter of great importance such as this.

I just wanted to go over a few things as well. Devolution is about self-determination and self-government. I know that Members have said that devolution has been on the books for 20-some-odd years, but just a little bit of history. Since the NWT joined Confederation in 1870, I think that first meeting, if you read Hansard, they’re talking about devolving more power to the NWT even back then. Since then, many provinces have been carved from the great Northwest Territories and have gone on to be fully provinces of their own.

When I’m deciding over devolution, I’m going to be voting with my heart and conviction for the people in the communities and all the elders that are behind me. It’s no secret that the Dehcho have concerns about devolution. The leadership does not want anything in devolution to negatively impact the Dehcho Process for resolving the Aboriginal title and self-government issues.

As MLA for Nahendeh and as a Dene person myself, I share these priorities too. The language in the document speaks a lot that Aboriginal and Treaty rights will continue to be constitutionally protected. As well, current self-government negotiations will not be impacted if, in fact, there

are further lands that, say, the Dehcho want to negotiate. I think at that time there is provision, as well, to increase any boundaries that agreed up and take those lands back from the Northwest Territories.

Earlier in the House, I spoke in my Member’s statement about the community of Nahanni Butte. I think that’s my focus. I don’t want my communities and my residents to lose out on any of the benefits. I urge the Nahendeh communities and the leadership to carefully consider the merits of devolution. There are many benefits that they can use for positive development of their communities.

Just thinking back as I’ve done my spring tour in the Nahendeh riding this spring, I tried to convey to my constituents and to the leadership. I think in 1985, when we were a full Dene Nation then, we were negotiating a deal with Interprovincial Pipelines, which is now known as Enbridge Pipeline, for a portion of ownership for that pipeline. For whatever reason, it was rejected. The numbers varied, but the number I remember is about 5 percent ownership in that pipeline. The Aboriginal group at that time said no, we will hold out for more. Consequently, the federal government, based on national interest, approved the pipeline, and the pipeline was built. Now they look back, and the 5 percent interest was about $1 million a year, Mr. Speaker. It’s in excess of 30 years, so all that revenue is gone for the communities and the residents that we could have used to develop and build our communities.

I think we are faced with the same thing in the Deh Cho. It seems now if the Dehcho First Nation says no, the communities will not have access to that additional revenue to build their communities. So I’m in a bit of a quandary right now. That’s why I stand up here and say we really have to consider this. For myself as MLA representing my constituents, I do not want us to lose out again.

As much as they said in the media in the communities about losing land, the federal government is giving land to the Northwest Territories. Yes, they are. We come from a long, proud history of a trapping economy, and that’s using the land. By owning the resources and the land, we can still use the land to generate an economy. Now, that’s the resources that we depend on that my parents told me about and my grandparents told me about.

As well, when we talk about devolution, I think about it as well as decentralization: a huge opportunity to get jobs out of Yellowknife into the communities and into the regions. As well, there is talk about additional revenue and creating infrastructure. Infrastructure should not only be built in Yellowknife but it should be built in the regional centres as well. We’ve got a lot of work ahead of us. We’ve got lots of legislation ahead of us.

So with that, Mr. Speaker, I’m truly in favour of stopping the flow of resource revenues out of our territory, and I stand here today and say I will be supporting the motion on devolution. Mahsi cho, Mr. Speaker.

Thank you, Mr. Menicoche. To the motion. Mr. Bromley.

Mr. Speaker, I have serious concerns about this agreement, and I know I speak for many Northerners as I describe these concerns to you. But before I do, I want to acknowledge and thank the Premier and his staff who have worked so hard, and in many cases joyfully, to develop this agreement.

This deal provides too little money to take over a regime that is already inadequate and underfunded. The annual funding transfer to run these programs falls $20 million short, even of the estimates that we developed in looking at devolution a decade ago. We walked away from that deal in part because the money was not good enough.

There are many specific concerns that are bothersome. We will be enacting mirror legislation that perpetuates the weakened federal legislation that underpins the current management regime. We are getting the authority, but not quite, because we are forced to continue with the federal law we’ve already found so frustrating.

There’s Norman Wells. There’s the detailed schedules appended to the agreement that have remained unknown until last night and thus are not reviewed. The intergovernmental council is opaque. Concerns remain about the liabilities of contaminated sites devolved to GNWT or those that will develop as a result of limp federal review given the forced time frames and decimated budgets that they must deal with.

We don’t know how much the deal will actually set us back. For example, we took firm action to require security for remediation and abandonment costs of development on Commissioner’s lands. The new federal regime fails to demand this security, lowering the high standards we’ve learned are essential to responsible management in the public interest.

Our resource royalty regime is no better than it’s ever been, and despite several objective reviews by different parties, including some by the federal government, all concluding our royalty rates are set too low. And despite imminent devolution, there appears to be no intent of this government to protect the public interest as our most valued resources are extracted and shipped off. Consider, for example, that as the federal Minister of AANDC admitted only Monday in Ottawa, the total revenues paid to Canada throughout the life of Giant Mine were $4 million, a royalty rate similar to what is collected today from diamond mining.

The devolution deal is unsettling because of key authorities retained and actions being taken by our higher level negotiating partner, the Government of Canada. All we get out of this deal is the ability to permit development that the feds have brought forward through their inadequate review processes, when reviews happen at all. The federal government has held back the truly potent powers to decide what projects proceed to environmental review, and to review and recommend controls and safeguards through the environmental review process. We are left with the consequences.

Many believe this deal, and the way it’s being done through a naive partner, reveals an orchestrated resource grab. While the federal government makes it ever easier to access and extract our resources ever more quickly, and retains power over project environmental reviews, we are seeing communities and government left cleaning up messes and people suffering ever greater disparities of income and opportunity.

Combined with the GNWT’s open for business and worry about conservation later approach, a soaring cost of living, and a megaproject focus that benefits the few, the drain of Northerners will continue and even escalate, replaced with yet more commuting workers from afar. This, of course, would be in line with the strategy of the federal government and, certainly, the extractive industries that clearly have its ear, because as a consequence, it would be ever easier to ignore the public interest in favour of increasing reliance on raw resource extraction. Our current GNWT Cabinet seems disturbingly aligned with this federal government, heightening the worries that many feel.

Should these concerns be realized, we would see a continuation of the regime that has left us historically disgusted with the federal management of resources that has prompted many to already quit and leave. For those of us who are Aboriginal and/or long-term residents, here until death do us part, the lack of power to control the front end of managing development means many residents will continue to suffer from the negative social and environmental costs the federal regime has permitted and even promoted.

I am concerned about the hype and focus on the bucks we will get. To put things in perspective, all of GNWT’s hypothetical resource revenues this year would have gone up in smoke with this year’s commitment to the Inuvik-Tuk highway alone. And while we are getting more dollars, the federal government is cutting funding to our Aboriginal government partners.

Perhaps the saddest thing of all on this deal is our failure to meet citizen interest in being meaningfully informed and involved. Clearly, it is a different perspective, I know, than the Premier has.

While our Premier and this Assembly could easily have chosen to take this to the people for a direct participation, we chose the paternalistic way, typical of colonizing governments. Hey, people, we have the authority. We can make decisions without asking you a darn thing. As I said, sad.

I remain amazed that this government passed up this golden opportunity to hear the voice of our people and add the stamp of widespread support such a vote surely would have returned. When all is said and done, we still have the potential to learn from this divisive exercise so artfully staged by the federal government and wilfully rendered by ourselves. We do gain significant power, most immediately the opportunity to strive inclusively to gain the trust of those whose trust we have lost, to mend the division this process has cost and ultimately the opportunity to customize legislation to make it our own and eventually to get back to the table to finally devolve the environmental management regime on which responsible decisions can and must be made, decisions by the people who occupy the land.

To quote one of my constituents, Ms. Lois Little, “The path the NWT is on should be clear to everyone. There should be no divisiveness among us.” We should indeed be masters in our own houses, as we have heard before today. Like Ms. Little, I do not believe we are there yet, but I am going to take a leap of trust and believe that we now recognize this as our goal, that we have learned a lot about how to and how not to get there, and that the insides of this Trojan horse – thanks, Mike – are more benign than some fear to be the case.

Yes, I will be voting in support of the motion for this increment of devolution. Yes, I support this historic next step towards home rule for the people of the Northwest Territories. Yes, I agree that for too long our citizens have been held at the whim of the distant, insensitive and often disinterested federal stewardship of our most important prerogatives. We have been under the control of a resource management regime that fails to meet our needs, fails to deliver maximum benefits to our people and, most importantly, fails to sensibly safeguard the social and environmental values we hold dear.

I will be voting in favour of the motion, but as must be utterly clear by now, my support is definitely a qualified yes. I, and I know my colleagues too, will be working hard, either within or outside this House, to try and ensure that this is a good decision, for it is how we go forward that is now critical, completing our family. Let’s overcome the divide and conquer strategy we have pursued and meet the needs to get the Akaitcho and the Dehcho on board.

Implementation: Let’s recognize that energy is fundamental to our cost of living, and pull it out of the empire of the Department of Energy, Minerals

and Petroleum Development and give it the stance it needs to serve the people.

Evaluation: What course correction assurances will we have in place?

Reporting: How will we strive to be transparent, openly consultative and accountable?

I hope this government has learned that how we do things is almost as important as what we do. Devolution, in principle, can be good. I am taking the high road. Mahsi.

Thank you, Mr. Bromley. To the motion. Mr. Bouchard.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. As you indicated, this is a big day today. I would like to thank the Premier, Cabinet Ministers and my colleagues here for all the hard work on this topic and all of the MLAs that came before us that have worked on this topic.

I will be supporting this motion. I support devolution, and devolution will give Northerners control over northern issues.

I believe that devolution will bring jobs from Ottawa to the North, and this Assembly has committed to putting those positions out into the communities and out into the regions. Devolution will bring us 60 or 70 million dollars per year. That money will go into the northern economy. It will add additional services to our constituents, to the people of the Northwest Territories. It will be used to pay down debt. It will be used to give money to the future generations in the Northwest Territories.

I have been able to discuss this issue, this very important issue, with all of my colleagues here, as well as all of the people of Hay River. We’ve been able, over the last few months, to have several meetings there. People have been asking me, is this a good deal, is this the deal we should be signing? I tell them, one of the examples is the Yukon government. As soon as they saw our potential deal, they wanted to go back to the federal government and sign a similar type of deal. So I do believe that it is a strong deal.

Is it the best deal? There are some things that aren’t in this deal. Some of my colleagues have already referred to it. Regulatory review process has been left out. The federal government believes that they need to change it and get that implemented before we can take control. That’s a big question.

Norman Wells revenue is not in here, resources that are northern. The revenue resources from that project are being taken out of the Northwest Territories and kept with the federal government. Is that acceptable? That’s a question that the people will have.

My colleagues have also talked about a 5 percent cap on the amount of revenue sharing we can

have. Some people are concerned with that. Some people feel that the 5 percent actually limits us from raping our environment and controlling how much development we do. We don’t want to take too much revenue because we’d just end up giving it back to the federal government. So that controls some of the development that we want to do. We want to do responsible development.

One of the other issues is the contaminated waste sites and what the liability issues for the future will be for this territory. That’s a big question mark.

The other issue that’s come up is, obviously, there are two Aboriginal groups that have not signed on. That is a shame. We need to keep working on that. Even more recently, as of even today, we’re receiving concerns from the NWT, their concerns about the division of the Aboriginal governments’ money and how it’s going to be divided up. They are very concerned with this. The government is wanting to leave it in the Aboriginal groups’ hands, and I understand that concept, but the NWT Metis are very concerned and not sure if they’re going to continue to be in the process. I’m very concerned, obviously, about that.

With these concerns, I’ve obviously indicated that I will support it, and I think the benefits and the future of the Northwest Territories is very strong. So I think devolution will give the NWT a bright, shining future.

Mr. Speaker, I will be supporting this motion. Thank you very much.

Thank you, Mr. Bouchard. To the motion. Mr. Hawkins.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I’m proud that this discussion, in my view a decision, is before the House. As I said back in March of this year and as I’ve said many times over the years, home rule is finally coming home to where it belongs: to the people of the Northwest Territories. We’re in a position to chart our own destiny. We’re in the position, if not the driver’s seat, to make our own choices. And remember, sometimes when you’re in charge, you do make mistakes. So I don’t expect things to be perfect, but the exciting thing about being in charge is the people of the Northwest Territories are in charge, in partnership with their Aboriginal governments. So in other words, the people of the Northwest Territories are in charge of our future.

As I said back in March at great length, although I won’t repeat it, Frederick Haultain, our first Premier back on October 7, 1897, had been fighting for a true Northwest Territories. He saw a vision of a big Northwest Territories all across Canada, which would have been, of course, Alberta, Saskatchewan and part of Manitoba. Well, that dream never happened. The Northwest Territories lost its authority back in 1905. So when this

devolution deal gets implemented next year, it will be 109 years since the Northwest Territories has been trying to join the mosaic of Canada, over a century since we wanted to be back at the table and are finally allowed to be back at the table.

We rightly belong in the driver’s seat of our territory. We rightly belong enjoying the partnership of our Aboriginal governments. We have five of seven, as you’ve heard repeatedly here today. I look forward to hearing we have seven out of seven and I’m sure that day is coming soon.

Why do people want to be in charge? Because they believe we have reached the time. Time could not be better. Our future is promising. We cannot miss this opportunity.

Devolution never snuck up on this government. We didn’t go to work one day last week and all of a sudden a deal was there. Many people deserve a lot of credit for the hard work that has been brought forward today. A lot of people have dreamt of this, and as mentioned by other Members, a lot of them have always supported devolution. Even those who are concerned about it support devolution in some form.

The mosaic, as I’ve said, of Canada is a beautiful one. I think it’s now time that they let us sit at the table and share and learn about the way the people in the Northwest Territories do government, we do business. We don’t just do it willy-nilly. We don’t just do it in an autocratic form. We do it in partnership. Every day we tread forward we make new tracks, methods and ways that people have never seen before. As I said, will it be perfect? No, it will not, but Ottawa is finally relinquishing some control and we are accepting it, but in the form of partnership and opportunity.

I have heard this before that the public relations portion of this is the deal, take it or leave it, may have been phrased slightly better. I wouldn’t disagree with anybody who has made that problem. Yes, we probably could have run a better public relations campaign. Yes, the statement in the House may have been a little gentler by the Premier at the time. Yes, those who heard it may have been given the chance in the method of saying, wait a minute, this is the deal that people have been working on, either take it or leave it. I don’t think it was meant in a mean form, but public relations on this deal probably could have been a little better.

I would say the Premier has met his effort by reaching out. He’s sent teams of individuals, experts, knowledgeable people. He’s gone to so many communities, there have been so many public meetings, there have been unprecedented opportunities to draw out this type of information. Never before in my experience in 10 years of being in the Legislature, never before in anyone’s

experience have we seen anyone go to such lengths to reach out to talk to people and try.

The naysayers will always find fault. They will always say we didn’t try hard enough. Could we have gone to every single door? Obviously, that’s impossible, but I would say that the Premier, in my view, has met the goal of trying to get out and show Northerners if you’ve got questions, he’s got answers. They may not be the answers everyone wants to hear, they may not be the answers they need to hear, but the fact is that open door, the reaching out, the effort has been made. It’s been a relentless struggle, it’s been a relentless fight, and I think the people involved in that struggle and that fight to get the message out certainly deserve a great pat on the back from all of our people in this Assembly.

A lot of people said they don’t like the deal. A lot of people said that they felt that the details of the deal came late. Mr. Speaker, 43,000 people can’t have their hand on that pen. No negotiations of this form are ever done entirely in public. It’s when the deal has reached the point where everyone has accepted this is what we can get, and that’s what happened in this case.

I hope that in time we will all be working together and I know the challenges before us are many. One of the challenges before us – and it should never be lost upon us – is how we work together in the future. We have many chapters in the devolution deal. We have many focuses when you hear Aboriginal people talk about how their government will work with our government. There is no simple answer.

I’ve always said someday the true Northwest Territories evolves into a constitutional development, has a Senate that oversees the work of the public government, works in partnership with the Aboriginal governments and we all work together. Is that the right model? I don’t know, but I look forward to that discussion.

The race is off and running. I’ve heard the starter pistol go. We’re on our way. We’re in the game not unlike ever before. Will the day after look any different? Other than a bit of letterhead, probably not. Deals will continue, processes will continue, stewardship will continue, people will continue.

I don’t think that anything’s going to change in the context of yes, hardworking Northerners will be working at home with their northern partners and their northern colleagues, all under a banner of northern people.

When Health and Transportation came over, there was not a public outcry about saying, well, you didn’t tell us. Now, that’s not necessarily a fair comparison, I realize that. But it’s time the Government of the Northwest Territories starts

taking charge of its own destiny. We have evolved in maturity. The future truly belongs to us.

As I said earlier, this devolution deal didn’t sneak up on us, but in 2007, I remember the elected Assembly came to work here, and they said devolution is off the table. It isn’t going to happen. But it’s funny, when people get working together with a common interest in saying how can we find a way, we can find a way, let’s find a way. It did find a way. The turn of events, as I pointed out, didn’t just happen overnight, but perhaps one could say in a serendipity type of way, the stars finally started to align.

As the future now is before us, in many ways it’s a blank page. The narrative is ours to write. It’s ours to hold. It’s ours to embrace. It’s for our children and it’s for their children. There will always be unknowns, and everyone will know that there will be tough days ahead of us. Today is one of those days. April of next year will be yet another day, and there will be many days when we say maybe we shouldn’t have done this. But I think, and I can guarantee, that there will be many days ahead of us that we’ll be saying thank goodness we took that extra step. Thank goodness we were willing to put it on the line. Thank goodness we empowered our negotiators to get the best deal they can.

Now, you’ll hear, as my colleagues have stated, that my goodness, we didn’t get Norman Wells. Well, I don’t know if we’re going to ever get everything we want. I mean, ask any other province across Canada. Did they get everything they want? I mean, it’s part of the process. But did we get what we hoped we could? I think we did.

As spoken earlier, even the Yukon is now glaring at our deal, thinking we must have done something right, and that alone should be asking ourselves are we doing something right. I think, yes, we are, because of that. There are many indicators of this.

The sky will not fall on implementation day. People will be working hard, and I know they will. But I believe Northerners who are doing the jobs right now, who are taking care of certain stewardship that will be transferred over, will continue the fine, exemplary work that they are doing today, and I think no less of them today and worry in any fashion, and I know they will contribute just as hard to the northern destiny, to the northern fabric before us.

Devolution doesn’t end anything. It begins everything.

I’ve heard my colleagues, and I agree, there is much concern about contaminated sites. It was a chapter that didn’t quite move forward on this initiative. The feds are choosing to keep it under them. Many people are worried, and frankly, I think that their concerns are correct. Do we need to ensure that stewardship is kept high and

implementation and concern of those are always on the front burner of every issue? I agree. But it doesn’t mean any less of a job is going to happen tomorrow. The feds, in time, will continue to take care of those issues, and when the day is right, we will decide when they are part of our issues.

Now, as I said earlier, there’s much work to be done, but I’m thankful for the compromise that many of our partners have finally done and agreed, and they have all joined to come forward with us on this journey. I look forward to next April when we can say today our destiny truly is ours.

Now, to close off this, I want to say that there has been great concern about the regulatory process. At this time, I don’t believe that this is a particular issue. I believe the work that is being done by the federal folks will continue. I believe our environment folks will continue to do good work. And I think any criticism of that is individual criticism, because of this government, of them as Northerners, of those people who you say won’t do as much of a good job. As I said earlier, I believe that their skills and abilities will continue in partnership with us all and we will all continue to proceed with great pride.

If you haven’t noticed, I guess I will be voting in favour of devolution, in case there is any question. This is a unique time. Whether people realize it or not, it may just seem like a page in Hansard, but today is a unique time in the world we will all look back and all ask ourselves, where were you on that day? Today is a special time for all of us. For that, I am going to say, once again, I will be voting for devolution and I’m awfully proud to be part of the group that saw this through. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Thank you, Mr. Hawkins. To the motion. Mr. Nadli.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. [Translation] I will be not be voting in favour of devolution. In developing the responsibilities to territorial government is what we are going to be voting to be…[Translation ends]

…recent public information session as information sessions, not general consultation of seeking the public’s views on devolution understanding that this is a take it or leave it deal.

What choice do we have? As a leader, I have major concerns regarding the lack of movement of both the GNWT and federal government on the progress of negotiations of the Dehcho Process. The federal government and the GNWT must support the conclusion of land claims and self-government negotiations with the Dehcho, the Akaitcho Territory. For the Dehcho Dene and Metis, the land is paramount, in front and centre. The fundamental issue is land quantum, the size of how much land both levels of government will allow the Dehcho to

own. Dehcho leaders have stated that the initial offer is inadequate.

Another matter is Dehcho land use planning has to move forward to receive favourable consideration. It has been 12 years since the start of the land use planning process. We cannot plan forever. I strongly encourage the Premier and Cabinet, along with the federal government, to move forward with the regions in good faith and build the trust that has been laid before. Mahsi, Mr. Speaker.

Thank you, Mr. Nadli. To the motion. Mr. Miltenberger.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would like to welcome all the people to the gallery, Aboriginal government leaders that are here, the hardworking devolution crew that is here, taking a moment’s respite from their labours and taking close notes about the concerns of where we are today.

Eighteen years now I have been an MLA and I have been waiting that long for this day, myself and Madam Groenewegen. This fact is one of the reasons that I ran for re-election. It was to try to conclude the process that we started late in the last Assembly.

As I can say once again, this is the biggest political moment since division. There will be no others for decades to come of this significance. It is a critical next step in us realizing our political destiny. It is not an event; it is a process.

The basic question for me and for Northerners is a simple one as we stand here burdened and bowed by the very many federal shackles that constrain us. We look at the agreement that we have negotiated, that will get us almost shackle-free. Will we be better off tomorrow or today after this vote than we are today? The answer is unequivocally yes. When people want to know, that is the language I put it in. We have to get rid of those federal shackles. There is going to be some there that are extremely galling, but we will get there. We can get to them as we take this step. It is not perfect. This government and this federal government will continue their work. This next government and the next federal government, as well, will follow through on the implementation and the pressure from Northerners to take over and finally control the resource development piece will be relentless.

We talked at great length in this House about the economics. That is good and it is important. The one piece that I want to mention that I think is incredibly important and we don’t want to overlook is water. We’re going to finally have legal control over water. We’re negotiating transboundary agreements with the provinces. Within the next few months they’re going be complete as a package, hopefully, and Northerners finally will control that

most valuable resource. I say that not lightly, because we’ve been across this territory to every community and the one thing that people say is the most important that binds everybody is water. We had to work hard to do that and the devolution negotiators deserve credit, because the federal government was tough, and wily, and slippery, and we had to watch very carefully. We are going to have, finally, at long last, that right, and that right, to me, makes this even more important.

So I will be, clearly, supporting this motion. Thank you.

Thank you, Mr. Miltenberger. Mr. Robert C. McLeod, to the motion.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I want to thank Mr. McLeod for bringing this motion forward. I want to thank Mrs. Groenewegen for seconding it. I want to thank the devolution crew for all your good work on this. As always, we task you with doing something, we make political decisions and then you’re left to put it into a document and you did a fantastic job.

During the course of our political careers, we run into many highlights and I’ve heard a couple pointed out. One was the division in 1999, and I’ve been fortunate and I’ve had a few highlights so far. One of my major highlights, I think, was being a witness to the Gwich’in signing on to the process in Aklavik in September 2012. I thought that was a huge move on their behalf and I thought it showed tremendous leadership, because I think it was said, at the time, it was better to be inside the tent than outside, and I totally agree with that. I commend them for it.

We’ve heard a number of different reasons today why we need devolution and we heard the Member for Nahendeh talk about an agreement they may have walked away from years ago that cost $30 million.

I posed a written question one time as a Regular Member on the amount that we’ve lost in resource royalties in the last 20 years, and I was surprised at the amount. It was huge, and our share of that would have been very significant and the Aboriginal governments’ share would have been very significant. This is not just about the money, it’s about, and I’ve always been a firm believer, is we need to be decision-makers in our own land and not have those decisions made for us. I truly support this agreement.

The Member for Frame Lake before was quoting a Rolling Stones song that says you can’t always get what you want, and I totally agree with that. Mr. Miltenberger said, is this perfect? It’s not, it’s still a work in progress, but if you look at the second part of this song it says that if you try sometime, you just might find you get what you need.

---Laughter

---Applause

And what we need and what we have today is a starting point, and the starting point is the Devolution Agreement we’re going to sign, and it will be refined and it will be more beneficial to us.

We can negotiate for the next 40 years and what’s going to happen? That’s all we’re going to do, is negotiate for the next 40 years. Are we going to be any further ahead? I don’t think so. I think the Member for Weledeh pointed out the fact that we may have walked away from a deal a few years ago that had a bit more money tied to it, and how long did we wait after that before we got to this point. So we can negotiate and negotiate and negotiate, and at the end of the day, resource royalties continue to leave, decisions continue to be made for us.

I want to thank the Aboriginal governments. I mean, it was huge that they all signed on. We all have our differences as a government, Cabinet to Regular Members, our differences with the Aboriginal governments, they have their differences with each other, but I commend you all for, at the end of the day, realizing and seeing the bigger picture that we need to unite and do this and I think it carries that much more weight.

There are a couple of groups that haven’t signed on yet. I’m fairly confident that they will and I think, at the end of the day, you want to work for your beneficiaries, look after their needs, but at the same time you have to look at the big picture, and I think the big picture and best interests of everyone is to sign on and I think they will make that decision.

Twenty years from now, when I’m sitting on my steps at my cabin with my 870 Express, waiting for the birds, I want to look back on my political career at some of the decisions that were made during my time and there’s been many. There’s been many, and there’s going to be more.

I see my grandchildren, their friends being beneficiaries of the decisions we make today. I’ll tell them for the twentieth time – I know they probably won’t want to hear it anymore by then – that I was part of a group of leaders, a group of 13 or 14 that got this deal done. We were here for the signing on to devolution, the implementation of devolution in 2014. I was part of that leadership along with all the Aboriginal leaders across the Northwest Territories, and I’m pleased to say I’m a part of that.

Needless to say, I am supporting devolution and I am looking forward to the many benefits that it’s going to bring residents of the Northwest Territories in the future. We do need a starting point and the starting point is right now, Mr. Speaker.

Thank you, Mr. McLeod. To the motion. Mr. Ramsay.

Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. I am certainly honoured to speak in support of this historic motion in the House today.

This government is committed to creating jobs and economic opportunities for the people of the Northwest Territories. We want a strong, diversified economy that creates long-term sustainable prosperity for our residents. Devolution will finally give this government, those of us gathered in the Chamber here today and the many governments that come after us, the tools and authorities to make that happen.

Our natural resources are the source of our wealth and prosperity. We have abundant oil and gas resources, minerals, rare earths and hydro potential that will fuel economic growth in the NWT and contribute in a great way to the overall Canadian economy. Responsible and sustainable development of those resources will create more jobs and opportunities to local businesses well into the future.

We have long held the decisions that influence the business and economy of our territory are better guided and managed by the people who live and work here. That’s the best way we can make sure that the NWT residents benefit from the development of resources located here in the NWT and it’s the best way we can make sure that development fits our priorities and our values.

With the final agreement on the devolution of authorities over public lands, water and resources, the people of our territory will finally have the power to plan and guide how we use and develop our natural resource wealth sustainably and responsibly. It will give us the ability to make sure our residents benefit from development in our territory and manage any environmental or social impacts.

For the first time in our history, we will be able to take control of the decisions affecting our economy and generate our own revenues to invest in our territory. New responsibilities will mean new jobs in the Northwest Territories and we are continuing to look at opportunities for decentralization as we work on an organizational design.

A revenue sharing agreement with our Aboriginal governments will open the doors for strong, viable and sustainable partnerships. Finally, we will be able to take a proactive, not a reactive, approach to economic decision-making here at home. The Government of the Northwest Territories will be able to look to the future and be able to plan for it. And, Mr. Speaker, we’ve already started.

In this session I’ve tabled the reports from the Economic Opportunities Strategy Advisory Panel and from the Mineral Development Strategy Advisory Panel, and when devolution comes, we are going to be ready to make the most of the

opportunity for all of our residents responsibly and sustainably.

Economic development needs infrastructure and this government is already making investments that will help to support growth. With the support of Members, we began construction on the Inuvik to Tuk highway earlier this year, and as part of a completed Mackenzie Valley Highway, this road will support increased exploration and development both on shore and offshore and connect the North and its resources to the rest of this country. Going forward, we will soon table a proposal with Canada that will help guide investments in our transportation infrastructure over the next decade and position us to clearly take advantage of our Devolution Agreement.

I have heard from my constituents and people across the Northwest Territories. They want the opportunities and benefits that devolution will bring. They understand the potential risks and rewards that come from responsibility and that responsibility that we will be receiving, but they have elected us to work in their best interest and I believe devolution is, indeed, in everybody’s best interest who lives in the Northwest Territories.

In closing, I just wanted to give thanks to Members I’ve served with in the past in the three governments previous to this one. I want to thank the Members that are here with us in the House today on this historic occasion. I want to also thank the Aboriginal governments and partners that have helped us reach today’s milestone. I also mentioned earlier the devolution team that we have in the gallery today and all the hard work that they’ve put in.

In closing, I really do believe that we have a great deal of thanks to give to our Premier, Bob McLeod. Under his leadership and guidance, we’ve been able to get where we’re at. He’s able to build partnerships, build respect amongst our partners, and we owe him a debt of gratitude for getting us where we’re at today.

Thank you, Mr. Ramsay. To the motion. Mr. Lafferty.

Mahsi, Mr. Speaker. [Translation] We are talking about a very important issue here because we’re going to transfer a lot of power to the territorial government here. The Premier has signed the agreement and I’m very happy that that was done. Today is a very special day, and when you look at it, I want to thank all the people that work on the devolution.

In 1967, that was the last time that we had some of the issues of devolution to happen. That was the Health and Education. Since then we also had the highway put through to the Northwest Territories. But now we have a document in front of us that is

going to have everything included that we had agreed with, and we’re starting to see it.

I know that there are some people that are not satisfied, and it is very difficult to have everybody agree, but when you look at the federal government and within Canada and the provinces, and also from the Nunavut government and other governments, it is very difficult to work with the budget, the money. But now with this agreement, it is an agreement that we may not see again, if we don’t agree with it, for a long time.

This agreement that is in front of us for the North, a lot of people are looking at it in the North. I know that there are a lot of people looking at us when we’re working on this agreement. There are a lot of issues that are within that agreement, but we are talking about generations that are to come, that are not here yet.

All the people were involved in the North with this agreement, but we’ve been talking about this for almost 30 years, because it’s very important. We are very careful. We want to make sure that we include everything that we wanted. I know the federal government, the way they work, so we have to be very careful and we have to have a lot of our Cabinet work with us, also the Aboriginal governments. We have to be very careful of the way the words were worded within the agreement, and also the federal government looked at the document, about the document, and we’ve been talking to the communities and to the people. When the Prime Minister came to the North, he looked at the agreement. We all opened the issue of devolution to the people at that time.

Also, the negotiating team travelled to all the communities and it was a very difficult job, but they did it. I know there are a lot of leaders here in the House and we’re here because they supported us. We are in one House. We are going to work with them and they are going to work with us. That is the only way that we are going to strengthen our political beliefs and concerns.

So if we are going to make this agreement work, we have to work on it ourselves. If we wait for the federal government, it’s going to take years on some issues that we’re concerned about. I know there are some issues we can change if we take on devolution. Devolution is going to help us with all those issues. Our House is going to be in charge of all the issues of the North as one person in this House, if devolution goes ahead.

On my last note, Mr. Speaker, the implementation, after we have signed our agreement with the federal government, we are going to be travelling on a new path on implementation. It’s almost like putting a puzzle together and we are going to be working on this for the next year. Like a baby, we are going to be holding each other with our elders in hand, and all the other leaders in place, and all

the northern people. We are going to hold hands and move forward. That is what we want, and that is why we are here and have come to this issue now.

Under the Premier, this has been done under the Premier and it’s a very difficult job, but it’s done. Also, Floyd Roland, who was the previous Premier, worked on it. The Legislative Assembly has a lot of people who worked on it too, all the Aboriginal governments who are in House with us and also our Inuit neighbours and the Inuvialuit and the Gwich’in. The Tlicho is also in support of this agreement with us. I know that we worked many years and it’s now like we have won. I know a lot of people are listening to us today, and in the North, right up to the Arctic Ocean, they are watching us.

I am here representing four communities. I am representing Tlicho, so I would like to thank all the people of the Tlicho Nation. Thank you very much. Now that the motion is in front of us, I am going to be in support of this motion. That’s what I have to say. Thank you.