This is page numbers 4327 – 4378 of the Hansard for the 17th Assembly, 5th Session. The original version can be accessed on the Legislative Assembly's website or by contacting the Legislative Assembly Library. The word of the day was health.

Topics

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

The Chair

The Chair Jane Groenewegen

Thank you, Premier McLeod. Thank you, witnesses. I’ll

ask the Sergeant-at-Arms to escort the witnesses from the Chamber.

Premier McLeod, are you ready to proceed with your opening comments on Bill 15, the Oil and Gas Operations Act? Premier McLeod.

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Bob McLeod

Bob McLeod Yellowknife South

Thank you for the opportunity to speak to Bill 15, Oil and Gas Operations Act. The passage of this legislation will be another step towards implementing the Northwest Territories Lands and Resources Devolution Agreement.

The Department of Industry, Tourism and Investment will administer the Government of the Northwest Territories’ new authorities under the Oil and Gas Operations Act.

Under the Devolution Agreement, the GNWT is obligated to substantially mirror Canada’s statutes and regulations that are being repealed or made inapplicable to lands transferring to the GNWT through devolution.

The mirroring exercise means that the new GNWT laws will address the same matters in substantially the same way as federal laws do now.

Mirroring principles limited changes to addressing issues such as outdated language and applying GNWT drafting standards.

Mirrored legislation is a practical first step to ensure a continued delivery of services on April 1, 2014. Mirrored legislation also ensures that there are no gaps or overlaps between GNWT and federal legislation.

The parties to the Devolution Agreement entered into a Protocol for Review of Devolution Legislation. Under this protocol, all parties have had the opportunity to review and comment on this legislation before it was introduced in the Legislative Assembly. We have considered these comments carefully in the preparation of the bill before you. The Oil and Gas Operations Act governs the exploration, production, processing and transportation of oil and gas in the onshore of the Northwest Territories. It does not apply to operations on lands that will be retained by Canada, such as waste sites and the Norman Wells Proven Area. Further, it does not apply to the Enbridge pipeline, which is a transboundary pipeline that will continue to be regulated by the National Energy Board under the National Energy Board Act.

The purpose of the Oil and Gas Operations Act is to promote safety, protection of the environment, the conservation of oil and gas resources, and joint production agreements.

The Oil and Gas Operations Act also empowers the Minister to approve a benefits plan or waive the requirement for such approval.

I would be pleased to answer any questions Members may have. Thank you.

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

The Chair

The Chair Robert Bouchard

Thank you, Premier McLeod. Do you have witnesses to bring into the House?

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Bob McLeod

Bob McLeod Yellowknife South

Yes, I do, Mr. Chair.

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

The Chair

The Chair Robert Bouchard

Is committee agreed?

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Some Hon. Members

Agreed.

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

The Chair

The Chair Robert Bouchard

Thank you, Premier. Could you please re-introduce your witnesses.

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Bob McLeod

Bob McLeod Yellowknife South

Thank you, Mr. Chair. To my right I have Thomas Druyan, legislative council with the Department of Justice. To my left I have Jamie Fulford, legal counsel with the Department of Justice.

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

The Chair

The Chair Robert Bouchard

Thank you, Mr. Premier. We’ll open general comments to Bill 15. Ms. Bisaro.

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Wendy Bisaro

Wendy Bisaro Frame Lake

Thank you, Mr. Chair. My first question has to do with the Premier’s opening remarks. In the very last paragraph he says, “The Oil and Gas Operations Act also empowers the Minister to approve a benefits plan or waive the requirement for such approval.” I have no idea what a benefits plan is. Can I get an explanation please?

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

The Chair

The Chair Robert Bouchard

Thank you, Ms. Bisaro. Mr. Fulford.

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Fulford

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I can draw the attention of the Member to Section 17 of the Oil and Gas Operations Act, and a benefits plan is a plan for the employment of Canadians and for providing Canadian manufacturers, consultants, contractors and service companies with a full and fair opportunity to participate on a competitive basis in the supply of goods and services used in any proposed work or activity referred to in the benefits plan.

There is a requirement before the issuance of any authorization for a benefits plan to be approved by the Minister and the act also provides the ability of the Minister to establish guidelines as to the content of a benefits plan.

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Wendy Bisaro

Wendy Bisaro Frame Lake

Maybe I could ask Mr. Fulford to give me that in plain English. I kind of got half of it, but I don’t really understand what he said. Thank you.

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Fulford

I’d be happy to try and give you a plain language version. It’s basically contracting opportunities and job opportunities associated with work in an area. For example, in the Sahtu with the current activity going on there, the companies there need to have these benefits plans approved to ensure that they’re employing local people in their operations.

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Wendy Bisaro

Wendy Bisaro Frame Lake

Thanks to Mr. Fulford. That was much easier. I’m just looking at Section 17 here and it seems to me that under Section 17(2), the Minister can waive the requirement for the approval in respect of work or activity. I think that’s the one. Under what circumstances would the Minister waive authorization of work, I guess?

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Fulford

I can speculate that in one instance where maybe the requirement would be waived is if there was an overarching benefits plan that applied to a full scope of operations and then there wouldn’t be a need on an individual authorization basis for a separate benefits plan in each case.

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Wendy Bisaro

Wendy Bisaro Frame Lake

Thanks, Mr. Fulford. I’m still struggling to understand this benefits plan. If you say it applies to everybody, so there’s no need for an authorization. Is this benefits plan specific to the NWT or it’s bigger than that? I’m not really understanding what we’re talking about here. Thank you.

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Fulford

The provision, Section 17 speaks to the employment of Canadians and providing opportunities for Canadians, but what this really means and even the current guidelines of the federal Minister Valcourt really focus on the local benefit, in particular the benefit to local Aboriginal businesses so the way it’s been interpreted is the closer that you are to the operation, the more the benefits plan should focus on giving you opportunity. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Wendy Bisaro

Wendy Bisaro Frame Lake

Thanks to Mr. Fulford. I think I kind of get it.

The other thing I wanted to ask about is again related to security and deposits and funds that are required. I believe it’s in Section 10. Section 10 allows for deposits for liability related to loss and damage, but deposits are not mandatory. I suspect I know the answer, but I’m going to ask the Premier or Mr. Fulford anyway. Why are we not making these deposits mandatory? It goes to the whole issue again of financial security and the need to have closure and regulation plans and just the whole protection of our environment issue. Thank you.

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Fulford

Of course, we are mirroring the existing federal legislation. But as I pointed out before in the discussions on the Petroleum Resources Act, the other section that’s related to Section 10 is Section 64, which talks about that requirement, provides proof of financial responsibility. I can’t think of a situation where you’d want to waive that completely, but that’s merely speculation on my part. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Wendy Bisaro

Wendy Bisaro Frame Lake

Again, it’s just one more thing that I think we need to add to the list of potential amendments to the act. I think, as legislators, we

need to make sure that NWT residents are protected against potential financial liabilities, and we have to make sure that any legislation that we put in place around developments and so on ensures our people are going to be protected, that this government is going to be protected in having to pick up liabilities, whether it be through closure or whether it be through spills or whether it be through just bad practices as an industry.

I wanted to ask a question with regards to a spill. I think it’s in Section 65. Section 65(5) seems to require an inquiry for a bigger spill or event, but it sounds as though the Minister has some discretion in making the inquiry publicly available. Is this again mirroring or is this something where the Minister will have discretion and if he or she doesn’t really think this big spill needs to be released to the public or the report on this spill doesn’t need to be released, that he or she doesn’t have to release it. It kind of, again, goes to why is it not mandatory, that reporting on a major spill is not mandatory? Thank you.

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

The Chair

The Chair Robert Bouchard

Thank you, Ms. Bisaro. Mr. Druyan.

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Druyan

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Actually, 65(5), if I may correct the Member, is actually mandatory. The Minister has no discretion not to report. The discretion is in the manner of reporting so whether it’s newspapers or on the website or things like that, but it has to be made publicly available. Hopefully that answers the question. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

The Chair

The Chair Robert Bouchard

Thank you, Mr. Druyan. Ms. Bisaro.

Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters

Wendy Bisaro

Wendy Bisaro Frame Lake

Thank you, Mr. Druyan. Yes, that’s clear. I’m laughing because the manner in which it’s released could be one page as opposed to 20 pages, and I understand that’s not what you said, so my question then goes to what is going to identify the manner in which it’s released; refers to electronic versus paper versus something else as opposed to you can release it in a manner of, you know, a one-page summary or a 300-page detailed document? Thanks.