This is page numbers 163 - 184 of the Hansard for the 12th Assembly, 2nd Session. The original version can be accessed on the Legislative Assembly's website or by contacting the Legislative Assembly Library. The word of the day was questions.

Topics

Members Present

Hon. Titus Allooloo, Mr. Antoine, Mr. Arngna'naaq, Mr. Arvaluk, Hon. Michael Ballantyne, Mr. Bernhardt, Hon. Nellie Cournoyea, Mr. Dent, Mr. Gargan, Hon. Stephen Kakfwi, Mr. Koe, Mr. Lewis, Mrs. Marie-Jewell, Ms. Mike, Hon. Don Morin, Mr. Nerysoo, Hon. John Ningark, Hon. Dennis Patterson, Hon. John Pollard, Mr. Pudlat, Mr. Pudluk, Mr. Todd, Hon. Tony Whitford, Mr. Zoe

---Prayer

Item 1: Prayer
Item 1: Prayer

Page 163

The Speaker

Good afternoon. Orders of the day for Thursday, February 27, 1992. Item 2, Ministers' statements. Mr. Kakfwi.

Ministers' Statement 18-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing
Item 2: Ministers' Statements

Page 163

Stephen Kakfwi

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu

Mr. Speaker, cabinet has made a decision to sell government-owned staff houses in Yellowknife, Hay River and Fort Smith. The homes will be appraised and sold to the occupants at market rates.

---Applause

There are 113 of these units. The potential revenue to government will be about $12 million.

---Applause

Occupants who are not able to arrange conventional mortgages through the banks will be able to enter into a lease-purchase plan with the government. The lease-purchase plan will be based on current mortgage rates and conditions. There will be no special deals.

This initiative comes at a time of low mortgage rates and 95 per cent financing. The federal government's announcement of allowing up to $20,000 in RRSP savings to be used toward payment of the purchase price may be another incentive to some people to buy the home they presently occupy.

The initiative is the first phase of a long-term staff housing strategy. That strategy will outline a plan for providing staff housing where it is needed most and eliminating it in communities where employee needs can be looked after by the private sector. It will consider overall housing needs in the Northwest Territories and will integrate our reduced staff housing needs with other government housing programs.

In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, employees living in government-owned housing in Yellowknife, Hay River and Fort Smith will have four months to arrange financing and make a formal offer to purchase. After that period, the units will be subject to the terms and conditions of the long-term housing strategy which is scheduled to be finalized in June of this year. Thank you.

Ministers' Statement 18-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing
Item 2: Ministers' Statements

Page 163

The Speaker

Ministers' statements. Mr. Allooloo.

Ministers' Statement 19-12(2): Telecommunications Legislation
Item 2: Ministers' Statements

Page 163

Titus Allooloo Amittuq

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The Hon. Perrin Beattie, federal Minister of Communications, has advised me that the federal government intends to table new telecommunications legislation today.

The tabled telecommunications legislation strives to deal with the importance of this high technology industry in an increasingly global community. Of particular importance is an obligation of the federal Minister to consult with the two territories and the provinces in the discussions of communications issues.

The Minister has also advised me of his intention to regionalize the CRTC, Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission. He will be obtaining the views of the provinces and Territories regarding the location, method of appointment, and duties of commissioners, including regionally-based commissioners. Mr. Speaker, Mr. Beattie also intends to establish a conference of Ministers to discuss emerging policy issues on a regular basis.

Mr. Speaker, I point this out particularly as an indication of the success of the Government of the Northwest Territories in being accepted as a partner with the federal and provincial governments in the management of Canada. I am pleased that we continue to move forward in our efforts to strengthen our position in confederation. Thank you.

Ministers' Statement 19-12(2): Telecommunications Legislation
Item 2: Ministers' Statements

Page 163

The Speaker

Ministers' statements. Ministers' statements. Item 3, Members' statements. Mr. Lewis.

Speaker's Birthday
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 163

Brian Lewis Yellowknife Centre

Mr. Speaker, I rise today and had a Member's statement prepared on a different subject from the one I am going to address today. I keep a journal and have kept one for over 30 years, Mr. Speaker, and had thought that your birthday was tomorrow. I have since learned that, in fact, it is today. I would like to point out that as the Minister of Justice our honourable Speaker kept his cards very close to his chest. It was very, very tough to get information out if he really did not want to divulge it.

I remember trying to get from our current Speaker the information I wanted about a lady called Mrs. Hope, who was in the prediction business, who would tell you your fortune, and I found it very, very difficult to find out under what kind of regulation or law she, in fact, practised this profession of predicting people's future. So since we now have a northern government with an access to information act, I would like to urge all Members to use whatever force they can so that this very carefully guarded secret would be available to all people in the Northwest Territories.

I would like to know, and I ask all Members to help me in this process, to find out not only how old the Speaker is, how many years he has got on the clock, but also where he was born, what time of the day, in fact, this great event took place, so that we can refer the information back to Mrs. Hope so that she can predict the future, not only of our Speaker, but also of this Legislative Assembly. Thank you.

---Applause

Speaker's Birthday
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 163

The Speaker

That information, as all information, will be

available when the freedom of information bill comes out. Thank you for those wishes as I enter my golden years. Members' statements. Mr. Koe.

"reshaping Northern Government" Working Group
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 164

Fred Koe Inuvik

Mahsi, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to make a statement regarding the ordinary MLAs' participation on the newly formed Reshaping Northern Government working group. The motion was passed in this House which requested that the Government Leader include three ordinary Members of this Assembly on its strategy committee for implementing the recommendations of the report, Strength at Two Levels. Subsequently, I, along with my colleagues Jim Antoine and James Arvaluk, were chosen by the honourable Members on this side of the House to represent them on the proposed committee, and now everyone in this House is aware of the feelings of most of the ordinary Members relating to the perceived implementation plan of the Strength at Two Levels report.

Mr. Speaker, yesterday I rose in this House and spoke about my concern about participating on this committee at this time. When I spoke, I had no information or plans as to what the ongoing process and task of the working group would be. Subsequently, later in the afternoon, I and all my colleagues received a letter from the Government Leader inviting us to participate with three Ministers on the newly named Reshaping Northern Government working group. Also, during discussions in committee of the whole yesterday, the Minister of Finance talked about involving other ordinary Members by channelling any proposed changes through the appropriate standing committees. Mr. Speaker, this is the type of information which we were waiting to hear. We wanted to be reassured that the government was not moving ahead full bore without our involvement.

Mr. Speaker, I would like to seek unanimous consent to proceed with my statement.

"reshaping Northern Government" Working Group
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 164

The Speaker

Unanimous consent has been requested. Are there any nays? There are no nays. Proceed, Mr. Koe.

"reshaping Northern Government" Working Group
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 164

Fred Koe Inuvik

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I am probably one of the last people to criticize or curtail management ability to get the job done, even if this entails making changes. In one of my first speeches to this Assembly I stated that I do not support the status quo. Changes are necessary to make the business of managing and running government more effective and efficient, and let us get on with it. I am from the school of thought always looking at ways of how do you do something, rather than hearing all the reasons of how not to do anything.

---Applause

Of course, I do not necessarily agree with everyone on everything, but through talking and discussions we can all make our viewpoints and opinions known. If it eventually comes to a vote, we can vote accordingly.

By allowing us to participate in developing an implementation plan and strategy, all Members will have an opportunity to express their views and those of their constituents.

Mr. Speaker, the honourable Member for Nahendeh, Mr. Antoine, the honourable Member for Aivilik, Mr. Arvaluk, and I have received the full support of our colleagues, and we will accept the invitation from the Government Leader to meet with their representatives to begin the task of reshaping northern government. Mahsi cho.

---Applause

"reshaping Northern Government" Working Group
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 164

The Speaker

Members' statements. Mr. Pudluk.

Late Mail Delivery
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 164

Ludy Pudluk High Arctic

(Translation) Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My constituency has a concern about mail delivery since Canadian Air stopped delivering it from the East and the West. First Air now has the contract to deliver mail. They fly from Ottawa to Iqaluit, Nanisivik, Resolute Bay and Yellowknife. From Yellowknife, they return the same route. The mail that is coming into my constituency from the West is flown first to Ottawa. The mail arrives very late, which causes real problems for people expecting urgent mail. We did not have a problem with late mail delivery when Canadian Air was delivering it. Canada Post should look into this problem so that my constituents can have better and faster mail delivery. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

---Applause

Late Mail Delivery
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 164

The Speaker

Members' statements. Mr. Patterson.

Conversion Of Direct Current Power To Alternating Current Power
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 164

Dennis Patterson Iqaluit

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I am very pleased to bring to the attention of all Members a scientific achievement which has been developed in the Baffin Region, and which I am sure all Members will find most exciting. The project involves a scientific method to convert DC power to AC power. In simple terms, the invention uses power from ordinary car batteries and changes this battery power into a form that is exactly the same as what we get from an ordinary wall socket in any home. For example, it can take two 12-volt car batteries and convert that into 1500 watts of power that will last for a minimum of 100 hours. All of this from a box weighing about 36 pounds!

In addition, the system can be easily recharged in a number of ways from windmills and solar panels to an ordinary battery charger. This means that the power is virtually available at all times, and the life of these batteries becomes spectacular in length.

The implications for power in remote communities is fantastic as it will offer options for a power source that eliminates much of the capital costs we presently incur when we install or provide portable generators. A new company called North Port, under the capable leadership of its president, Mr. Richard Porter, who is in this House today, has recently announced the completion of their factory in Iqaluit to meet the heavy demand for orders of this marvellous product. Initially, 10 local residents -- and I am happy to say they are to be all women -- will be employed in the factory, and with expanded growth potential, these figures will undoubtedly rise.

Mr. Speaker, I am proud of the efforts of my constituent, Mr. Jean Lambert, who invented this marvellous device, and I believe very strongly that the benefits from the manufacture of this amazing invention should stay in the North. I am also delighted that he has had collaboration with residents of Igloolik, notably Mr. Porter and Mr. Ike Haulli, to get this product marketed and off the ground.

Mr. Speaker, I would also like to distribute a recent newspaper article that provides more detail for Members. In doing so, I want to object to the...

Conversion Of Direct Current Power To Alternating Current Power
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 164

The Speaker

Mr. Patterson, your time has expired.

Conversion Of Direct Current Power To Alternating Current Power
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 164

Dennis Patterson Iqaluit

May I make a brief final

statement?

Conversion Of Direct Current Power To Alternating Current Power
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 165

The Speaker

The Member is seeking unanimous consent to proceed. Are there any nays? There are no nays. Proceed, please.

Conversion Of Direct Current Power To Alternating Current Power
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 165

Dennis Patterson Iqaluit

Humbly requesting unanimous consent, Mr. Speaker. In distributing this newspaper article, Mr. Speaker, I would like to take strong exception to the patronizing statement in that article that Iqaluit is a part of the world not noted for technological breakthroughs. Obviously that is no longer the case, Mr. Speaker. Qujannamiik.

Conversion Of Direct Current Power To Alternating Current Power
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 165

The Speaker

Thank you. Mr. Gargan.

Inmates Voting In Elections
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 165

Samuel Gargan Deh Cho

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. As many honourable Members know, there are provisions within our Plebiscite Act, Local Authorities Elections Act and the territorial Elections Act which state that incarcerated persons are not eligible to vote. Honourable Members will also be aware, though, that on January 28th the federal court of appeal heard the case of Belczowski versus Canada. On February 27th the court rendered a judgment that in essence held that it is arbitrary, unfair and irrational to prohibit incarcerates from voting.

Members who were here during the 11th Assembly will remember that I raised this issue way back on July 3rd, 1991. At the time, I sponsored a motion recommending that the Government of the NWT should use the Legal Questions Act to obtain a judgment on the constitutional validity of provisions in the territorial Elections Act which prohibit inmates from voting in territorial elections. Unfortunately, this motion was defeated. Some Members, including the current Minister of Justice, expressed an opinion that this issue should be decided "by people elected to this Assembly" rather than by the courts. It does not appear that the government has been able to address this issue to date. Now, instead of having a legislative amendment that we could debate, or a legal ruling on the constitutionality of the inmate voting prohibitions in our legislation, we only have confusion and uncertainty.

Mr. Speaker, the Northwest Territories is about to embark on the most significant vote of its political history. There is a risk that the entire procedure may be impacted by these new constitutional developments. I would urge the Minister of Justice to move quickly...

Inmates Voting In Elections
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 165

The Speaker

Mr. Gargan, your time has expired.

Inmates Voting In Elections
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 165

Samuel Gargan Deh Cho

Mr. Speaker, I seek unanimous consent to complete my statement.

Inmates Voting In Elections
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 165

The Speaker

Unanimous consent has been requested. Are there any nays? There are no nays. Proceed, Mr. Gargan.

Inmates Voting In Elections
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 165

Samuel Gargan Deh Cho

Thank you, Mr. Speaker and honourable Members. I would urge the Minister of Justice to move quickly in analyzing this federal court decision and in developing a proactive strategy for government action in this regard. Thank you.

Inmates Voting In Elections
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 165

The Speaker

On behalf of the Assembly I would like to welcome the president of the NWT co-operatives and its board of directors, Mr. Bill Lyall.

---Applause

Members' statements. Mr. Whitford.

1992 Canada Day Poster Challenge Winners
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 165

Tony Whitford

Tony Whitford Yellowknife South

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I rise today as the Member of the Legislative Assembly for Yellowknife South, to recognize four special young people. They are the winners of Canada Day Poster Challenge this year, three of whom are from my riding.

The first place winner is Patricia MacVicar, 11 years of age, from Yellowknife; second place winner is Sonny Lenoir from Fort Simpson, age 17; third place is Jason MacVicar from Yellowknife, age 14; and the fourth place winner is Elizabeth Wilson, age nine, also from Yellowknife.

The first place winner, Patricia MacVicar, and her parents have been invited by the Secretary of State to the official Canada Day ceremony on Parliament Hill on July 1st of this year. Along with the 11 other provincial/territorial finalists, Patricia will be flown to Ottawa courtesy of Canadian Airlines International. As you know, Mr. Speaker, Canada will be celebrating 125 years of Confederation this year.

The other winners will receive monetary rewards for their achievements. Buffalo Airways of Yellowknife and Hay River provided courtesy flights for Sonny Lenoir's flight from Fort Simpson to Yellowknife to attend a reception to be held later today.

Mr. Speaker, 1992 NWT Canada Day committee received no less than 350 entries for the contest, a record number, this year. All of these students who entered this challenge are to be congratulated.

I would also like to commend the 1992 NWT Canada Day committee whose representatives include the honourable Member for Inuvik, Mr. Koe; its president, Lynda Comerford; and vice-president, Ms. Theresa Handley, who worked so hard to put this and other activities together to celebrate Canada's birthday this year.

In closing, Mr. Speaker, I would like to invite all Members to join us in this lobby today at 4:00 o'clock for the presentation of awards and to view the very impressive artwork done by these youngsters from across the Territories. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

---Applause

1992 Canada Day Poster Challenge Winners
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 165

The Speaker

I would also like to add that Mr. Bill Lyall is a former Member of this Legislative Assembly. Members' statements. Mr. Pudlat.

Two Residents Of Sanikiluaq In House
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 165

Kenoayoak Pudlat Baffin South

(Translation) Mr. Speaker, I would like to welcome two people from Sanikiluaq, since I represent this community. Johnny Cookie, a member of Nunavut; also Lucassie Arragutainaq, a board member for Arctic Co-ops. I would like to welcome these two people to the Assembly. They are representing Sanikiluaq. Thank you.

---Applause

Two Residents Of Sanikiluaq In House
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 166

The Speaker

Members' statements. Members' statements. Mr. Arngna'naaq.

Snow Problems, Baker Lake
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 166

Silas Arngna'naaq Kivallivik

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would like to speak a little bit about the snow problems that we have in Baker Lake. As most people may be aware, the amount of snow in Baker Lake is a major problem. In some years there have been houses which have been completely covered by snow. The only way in which one could tell there was a building in that area was because there was a chimney sticking out of the snow. As a matter of fact, snowmobiles have driven over these houses. These conditions are not only hazardous, they are unacceptable. There was a project which was started a number of years ago. This project was to build a snow fence on the northwest side of the community, in the older section of the community. Today, the new area of the community is now being built with the prevailing winds in mind; however, the older section of the community is still being covered with snow today. I would just like to point out that the snow fence which was started a number of years ago has not been completed, and this is a concern that I would like to make Members aware of. Thank you.

---Applause

Snow Problems, Baker Lake
Item 3: Members' Statements

Page 166

The Speaker

Members' statements. Members' statements. Item 4, returns to oral questions. Returns to oral questions. Mr. Whitford.

Return To Question O134-12(2): Child Sexual Abuse Specialist Position For Kitikmeot
Item 4: Returns To Oral Questions
Item 4: Returns To Oral Questions

Page 166

Tony Whitford

Tony Whitford Yellowknife South

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I have a return to an oral question asked by Mr. Arvaluk on February 24, 1992, and it deals with a child sexual abuse specialist position in the Kitikmeot. There are only four child sexual abuse specialist positions to cover all regions of the Northwest Territories. The positions are in Fort Simpson, Inuvik, Iqaluit and in the Keewatin. The position in Fort Simpson is filled by a local resident. Interviews have been held and an offer made for the Inuvik position, and interviews are scheduled for the Keewatin and Iqaluit positions during the first two weeks of March.

The co-ordinator of the child sexual abuse program has offered training and treatment throughout the Northwest Territories prior to hiring the specialists. Once the positions are filled, she will also be able to concentrate on those regions without a child sexual abuse specialist. Training for the RCMP, social services and health care providers was completed in Cambridge Bay for the Kitikmeot Region. Extensive service has been given in Pelly Bay, Spence Bay and Cambridge Bay by the co-ordinator. The child sexual abuse specialist positions were part of the freeze on staffing; however, they were released due to the necessity of this needed service. Thank you.

Return To Question O134-12(2): Child Sexual Abuse Specialist Position For Kitikmeot
Item 4: Returns To Oral Questions
Item 4: Returns To Oral Questions

Page 166

The Speaker

Returns to oral questions. Mr. Allooloo.

Further Return To Question O43-12(2): Review Of Policies And Procedures Of Akaitcho Hall Residence
Item 4: Returns To Oral Questions
Item 4: Returns To Oral Questions

Page 166

Titus Allooloo Amittuq

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I have an answer to an oral question asked by Mr. Antoine on February 17, 1992, with respect to the review of policies and procedures of Akaitcho Hall Residence. The Member for Nahendeh requested a review of all policies and procedures regarding the supervision and care of the students staying at the Akaitcho Hall Residence.

The Department of Education is currently working with the Akaitcho Hall administrative staff to improve the procedures and staff guidelines for the supervision and care of the students. This will include a review of staff job descriptions to ensure that their responsibilities are stated clearly. As well, the department will conduct a full operational review of the Akaitcho Hall Residence in May, 1992. The review will focus on all aspects of operation, including the goals and objectives of the residence, training of staff, recreation and weekend activity programs for students, student leave procedures, and student support and participation in the operation of the residence.

We will do all we can to make sure that Akaitcho Hall provides the support and supervision a student needs. Thank you.

Further Return To Question O43-12(2): Review Of Policies And Procedures Of Akaitcho Hall Residence
Item 4: Returns To Oral Questions
Item 4: Returns To Oral Questions

Page 166

The Speaker

Returns to oral questions. Returns to oral questions. Item 5, oral questions. Mr. Antoine.

Question O172-12(2): Secretary/manager For Jean Marie River
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 166

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is to the Minister responsible for Municipal and Community Affairs regarding the community of Jean Marie River. Last July the secretary/manager left the community, and the department knew well ahead of time that this person would be leaving, and up to date this position has not been filled. As a result of that, there are a lot of problems within the community in terms of taking care of the administration of the community financially and project wise, and I know the problem there is that there is no co-ordination. Is the department going to be filling this position soon? Mahsi.

Question O172-12(2): Secretary/manager For Jean Marie River
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 166

The Speaker

Mr. Minister.

Question O172-12(2): Secretary/manager For Jean Marie River
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 166

Dennis Patterson Iqaluit

Mr. Speaker, I will have to take that question on notice and get back as soon as I can. Thank you.

Question O172-12(2): Secretary/manager For Jean Marie River
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 166

The Speaker

The question has been taken as notice. Oral questions. Mr. Todd.

Question O173-12(2): Adjustment To Ymir For Workers' Compensation Board
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 166

John Todd Keewatin Central

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is to the Minister responsible for the WCB. Section 1 of the Workers' Compensation Act defines the YMIR, year's maximum insurable remuneration, as $40,000. This means that no matter how much money a worker has been earning at the time of his injury, he will never be paid any more than $40,000. Mr. Speaker, it appears to me that this situation is rather unfair, particularly to the high income earners who suffer permanent disability injuries and must try to meet existing mortgages, pay the bills, and look after their children.

My question to the Minister is, since becoming Minister, has he received, by way of a formal motion or resolution of the Workers' Compensation Board, a recommendation to adjust the YMIR by amending the Workers' Compensation Act?

Question O173-12(2): Adjustment To Ymir For Workers' Compensation Board
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 166

The Speaker

Mr. Patterson

Return To Question O173-12(2): Adjustment To Ymir For Workers' Compensation Board
Question O173-12(2): Adjustment To Ymir For Workers' Compensation Board
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 166

Dennis Patterson Iqaluit

Mr. Speaker, to answer the Member's question in its narrowest sense, no, I have not received a formal recommendation from the Workers

Return To Question O173-12(2): Adjustment To Ymir For Workers' Compensation Board
Question O173-12(2): Adjustment To Ymir For Workers' Compensation Board
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

The Speaker

Supplementary, Mr. Todd

Supplementary To Question O173-12(2): Adjustment To Ymir For Workers' Compensation Board
Question O173-12(2): Adjustment To Ymir For Workers' Compensation Board
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

John Todd Keewatin Central

Thank you. In that case, will the Minister therefore make a commitment to introduce an amendment to the Workers' Compensation Act, during the second session of the 12th Assembly, which would adjust the earnings ceiling to an appropriate level in the YMIR?

Supplementary To Question O173-12(2): Adjustment To Ymir For Workers' Compensation Board
Question O173-12(2): Adjustment To Ymir For Workers' Compensation Board
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

The Speaker

Mr. Patterson.

Further Return To Question O173-12(2): Adjustment To Ymir For Workers' Compensation Board
Question O173-12(2): Adjustment To Ymir For Workers' Compensation Board
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

Dennis Patterson Iqaluit

Mr. Speaker, following discussions with the Workers' Compensation Board on this issue, I did ask the board if they would give me advice about what would be an appropriate level. They are reviewing the matter and, once I get that advice, I will proceed as expeditiously as possible to take the matter to cabinet and to this House to be dealt with.

It is a rather easy amendment to make, Mr. Speaker, but it does have financial implications that have to be studied carefully. I cannot guarantee next session, but I will work toward that goal. Thank you.

Further Return To Question O173-12(2): Adjustment To Ymir For Workers' Compensation Board
Question O173-12(2): Adjustment To Ymir For Workers' Compensation Board
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

The Speaker

Oral questions. Mr. Zoe.

Question O174-12(2): Deferral Of Large Capital Projects
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

Henry Zoe

Henry Zoe North Slave

My question is directed to the Minister responsible for the Department of Finance. Could the Minister inform this House whether or not there is a process in place to inform a community and the appropriate Member when a decision is made to defer or delay large capital projects?

Question O174-12(2): Deferral Of Large Capital Projects
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

The Speaker

Minister of Finance, Mr. Pollard.

Return To Question O174-12(2): Deferral Of Large Capital Projects
Question O174-12(2): Deferral Of Large Capital Projects
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

John Pollard Hay River

Mr. Speaker, I do not know if there is a formal process that is followed across all departments, but I can tell Mr. Zoe that in mid-December, 1991, Bob McLeod from Renewable Resources, in a telephone conversation with Chief Isadore Zoe, informed Chief Zoe that construction of the Lac la Martre office/warehouse complex was under review.

In 1992, on the 3rd of February, Len Hedberg advised Chief Isadore Zoe that the office/warehouse complex was under review and that no decision had been made. There was some consultation in that regard but, in answer to the Member's question, I do not know if there is a formal policy. I will undertake to find out, Mr. Speaker.

Return To Question O174-12(2): Deferral Of Large Capital Projects
Question O174-12(2): Deferral Of Large Capital Projects
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

The Speaker

Oral questions. Mr. Pudlat.

Question O175-12(2): Equipment And Tools To Be Used At The Baker Lake Craft Centre
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

Kenoayoak Pudlat Baffin South

(Translation) Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I have a question for the Minister of Economic Development and Tourism regarding the craft centre that was recently completed in December. I would like to ask the Minister what kind of equipment and tools the craft centre at Baker Lake will be using.

Question O175-12(2): Equipment And Tools To Be Used At The Baker Lake Craft Centre
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

The Speaker

Minister of Economic Development and Tourism, Mr. Pollard.

Return To Question O175-12(2): Equipment And Tools To Be Used At The Baker Lake Craft Centre
Question O175-12(2): Equipment And Tools To Be Used At The Baker Lake Craft Centre
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

John Pollard Hay River

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, they are using a wet grinding process which involves an electric motor that drives a grinding head. That demonstration is presently being put on in Yellowknife this afternoon. Thank you.

Return To Question O175-12(2): Equipment And Tools To Be Used At The Baker Lake Craft Centre
Question O175-12(2): Equipment And Tools To Be Used At The Baker Lake Craft Centre
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

The Speaker

Oral questions. Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I have a question for the Minister of Personnel with respect to his Minister's statement on the sale of staff housing. Can the Minister tell me how many units out of 113 are located in Fort Smith?

Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

The Speaker

Minister of Personnel, Mr. Kakfwi.

Return To Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

Stephen Kakfwi

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu

There are 49 units.

Return To Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

The Speaker

Supplementary, Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

Supplementary To Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Mr. Speaker, can the Minister indicate what the criterion is for an occupant to be eligible to purchase these units?

Supplementary To Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

The Speaker

Mr. Kakfwi.

Further Return To Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

Stephen Kakfwi

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu

Mr. Speaker, if a government employee lives in one of these units, they will receive a letter from us, probably tomorrow, notifying them that they can purchase the unit if they are interested.

Further Return To Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

The Speaker

Oral questions. Supplementary, Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

Supplementary To Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Would the Minister be able to tell me whether there are certain criteria, besides occupying the units, to be eligible to purchase one of these units?

Supplementary To Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

The Speaker

Mr. Kakfwi.

Further Return To Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 167

Stephen Kakfwi

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu

Mr. Speaker, the main intent is to get the government out of providing housing in these larger centres. It is not geared toward making it a benefit to

employees. It is to get us out of owning government units that are defined as stand-alone units.

Further Return To Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 168

The Speaker

Mrs. Marie-Jewell, supplementary.

Supplementary To Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 168

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Mr. Speaker, I received a concern from one of my constituents stating that it was indicated to them that only government employees are allowed to purchase these units after giving five years of service. This is why I am asking the Minister whether there are criteria set aside for disposing of these units. Can he tell me if this is correct?

Supplementary To Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 168

The Speaker

Mr. Kakfwi.

Further Return To Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 168

Stephen Kakfwi

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu

Mr. Speaker, I believe that might be confused with the original sale of units that happened last year. At that time the criterion for providing an offer to sell units in some communities was that it must be to employees who have been employed by the government for five years. That criterion is not necessary in this round. Thank you.

Further Return To Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Question O176-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Units In Fort Smith
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 168

The Speaker

Oral questions. Mr. Lewis.

Question O177-12(2): Government Support For Production Of Converter, Iqaluit
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 168

Brian Lewis Yellowknife Centre

Mr. Speaker, I heard only a few days ago about the technological advance which will now lead to development of a manufacturing plant in Iqaluit to produce the converter. I would like to ask the Minister responsible for Economic Development, is the Government of the NWT in any way involved, either in providing technical assistance or providing financial support for this particular company?

Question O177-12(2): Government Support For Production Of Converter, Iqaluit
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 168

The Speaker

Minister of Economic Development and Tourism, Mr. Pollard.

Return To Question O177-12(2): Government Support For Production Of Converter, Iqaluit
Question O177-12(2): Government Support For Production Of Converter, Iqaluit
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 168

John Pollard Hay River

I think they have been working with our department, Mr. Speaker, but they have not received any funds as yet. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Return To Question O177-12(2): Government Support For Production Of Converter, Iqaluit
Question O177-12(2): Government Support For Production Of Converter, Iqaluit
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 168

The Speaker

Supplementary, Mr. Lewis.

Supplementary To Question O177-12(2): Government Support For Production Of Converter, Iqaluit
Question O177-12(2): Government Support For Production Of Converter, Iqaluit
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 168

Brian Lewis Yellowknife Centre

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The technology has been around a long time, but this is a much more efficient development. I would like to ask the same Minister, and I hope I will not be ruled as asking a hypothetical question, Mr. Speaker, from the Minister's understanding of this development, would the generation of power by such a company have to be in any way regulated by any agency of the NWT government?

Supplementary To Question O177-12(2): Government Support For Production Of Converter, Iqaluit
Question O177-12(2): Government Support For Production Of Converter, Iqaluit
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 168

The Speaker

Mr. Pollard.

Further Return To Question O177-12(2): Government Support For Production Of Converter, Iqaluit
Question O177-12(2): Government Support For Production Of Converter, Iqaluit
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 168

John Pollard Hay River

Mr. Speaker, as the Minister responsible for the Public Utilities Board, I would have to say that utilities are regulated in the NWT. If the power was being generated and sold, then that might be something that the Public Utilities Board might have to look at. But if it is merely the use of this particular instrument in the NWT, I would not see that it would fall under the PUB, Mr. Speaker.

Further Return To Question O177-12(2): Government Support For Production Of Converter, Iqaluit
Question O177-12(2): Government Support For Production Of Converter, Iqaluit
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 168

The Speaker

Oral questions. Mr. Antoine.

Question O178-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Limited To Three Communities
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 168

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is to the Minister of Personnel regarding the statement he made on the sale of staff housing. I would like to know why only Yellowknife, Hay River and Fort Smith will be the communities where staff houses will be sold. There are other communities that have staff housing as well. Thank you.

Question O178-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Limited To Three Communities
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 168

The Speaker

Minister of Personnel, Mr. Kakfwi.

Return To Question O178-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Limited To Three Communities
Question O178-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Limited To Three Communities
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 168

Stephen Kakfwi

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu

Mr. Speaker, the overall approach on what we are going to do with government staff housing in the Northwest Territories is going to be addressed in June when we bring out our long-term housing strategy. In the meantime, we have decided that it is probably the least disruptive to the housing market if we go ahead with selling these housing units in only Fort Smith, Hay River and Yellowknife, since they have the most developed housing market. We are aware that by doing this it is not going to flood the private market because we are actually selling them to the people who are living in them.

The question of what to do with communities like Inuvik, Iqaluit, Fort Simpson, among other communities, will be addressed because we do not have, as yet, a comprehensive way to address the situation in those communities. Thank you.

Return To Question O178-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Limited To Three Communities
Question O178-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Limited To Three Communities
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 168

The Speaker

Supplementary, Mr. Antoine.

Supplementary To Question O178-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Limited To Three Communities
Question O178-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Limited To Three Communities
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 168

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I think the government employees who are living in government-owned staff houses in the smaller communities would feel that they have been dealt with unfairly with this new initiative. I know that some occupants in the past have indicated that they would not mind buying the units that they are presently living in. Would the Minister and cabinet consider selling these homes to the staff people living in them in the smaller communities, such as Fort Simpson? Mahsi.

Supplementary To Question O178-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Limited To Three Communities
Question O178-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Limited To Three Communities
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 168

The Speaker

Mr. Kakfwi.

Further Return To Question O178-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Limited To Three Communities
Question O178-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Limited To Three Communities
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 168

Stephen Kakfwi

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu

Mr. Speaker, this announcement is just indicating that at this time this is what we are prepared and feel comfortable with initiating and following through on. We are not at the stage where we are comfortable with addressing the situation in the smaller communities, but we will be, I believe, by June. We will take what the Member is saying into consideration. Thank you.

Further Return To Question O178-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Limited To Three Communities
Question O178-12(2): Sale Of Staff Housing Limited To Three Communities
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 168

The Speaker

Oral questions. Oral questions. Mr. Bernhardt.

Question O179-12(2): Qualified Social Services Superintendents
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 169

Ernie Bernhardt Kitikmeot

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I have a question for the Minister responsible for Social Services. Mr. Speaker, I believe that the successful delivery of social services at the regional level requires the presence of qualified managers. Would the Minister agree with me that because his department is trying to meet the needs of communities, it is important for regional superintendents in this department to be well qualified in terms of both theoretical and the practical parts of the job?

Question O179-12(2): Qualified Social Services Superintendents
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 169

The Speaker

Minister of Social Services, Mr. Whitford.

Return To Question O179-12(2): Qualified Social Services Superintendents
Question O179-12(2): Qualified Social Services Superintendents
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 169

Tony Whitford

Tony Whitford Yellowknife South

Mr. Speaker, I will not be specific on this except to say that, yes, in every instance that person who is occupying a position, certainly in a management area, must have the diplomas or certificates, certainly qualifications. There is quite a broad range of criteria for determining qualifications in any position. However, I am sure that Members will agree with me that we do, in any position, try to seek the person with the most qualifications, or as high a qualification as possible to meet that particular position.

Return To Question O179-12(2): Qualified Social Services Superintendents
Question O179-12(2): Qualified Social Services Superintendents
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 169

The Speaker

Supplementary, Mr. Bernhardt.

Supplementary To Question O179-12(2): Qualified Social Services Superintendents
Question O179-12(2): Qualified Social Services Superintendents
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 169

Ernie Bernhardt Kitikmeot

Does the Department of Social Services have a policy which puts a priority on hiring local candidates for regional management positions, regardless of their level of professional qualifications?

Supplementary To Question O179-12(2): Qualified Social Services Superintendents
Question O179-12(2): Qualified Social Services Superintendents
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 169

The Speaker

Mr. Whitford.

Further Return To Question O179-12(2): Qualified Social Services Superintendents
Question O179-12(2): Qualified Social Services Superintendents
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 169

Tony Whitford

Tony Whitford Yellowknife South

Mr. Speaker, I think that it is certainly a consideration in any decision to staff a position that we meet the requirements set out not only by the job description, but also by the criteria that Personnel has established for the selection of qualified people. One would be to try to find a person as close to home as possible.

Further Return To Question O179-12(2): Qualified Social Services Superintendents
Question O179-12(2): Qualified Social Services Superintendents
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 169

The Speaker

Supplementary, Mr. Bernhardt.

Supplementary To Question O179-12(2): Qualified Social Services Superintendents
Question O179-12(2): Qualified Social Services Superintendents
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 169

Ernie Bernhardt Kitikmeot

Can the Minister explain to the House why he decided to make a direct appointment which places a minimally qualified person in a training position which can eventually lead to her or his assuming the role of regional superintendent in my region, the Kitikmeot?

Supplementary To Question O179-12(2): Qualified Social Services Superintendents
Question O179-12(2): Qualified Social Services Superintendents
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 169

The Speaker

Mr. Whitford.

Further Return To Question O179-12(2): Qualified Social Services Superintendents
Question O179-12(2): Qualified Social Services Superintendents
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 169

Tony Whitford

Tony Whitford Yellowknife South

Mr. Speaker, I have never made a direct appointment in my life. Actually, let me put it this way. I have never made a direct appointment since becoming a Minister of Social Services. That is not something that I can take any account for.

Further Return To Question O179-12(2): Qualified Social Services Superintendents
Question O179-12(2): Qualified Social Services Superintendents
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 169

The Speaker

Oral questions. I wonder if I could take this opportunity to welcome some distinguished guests to our Assembly. George Cleary, the president of the Sahtu Tribal Council; Sandy Whiteman, executive director of the Sahtu Tribal Council; Gordon Yakeleya, council member; Henry Tobac, council member; Leonard Kenny, from the Fort Franklin band; and Danny Gaudet, from the Fort Franklin band.

We have some special guests from Manitoba. From the Swamp Cree Tribal Council, Harold Turner, Grand Chief; and Richard Flett, assistant executive director. Welcome.

---Applause

Oral questions. Mr. Gargan.

Question O180-12(2): Potential Implications Of Belczowski Versus Canada Court Decision
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 169

Samuel Gargan Deh Cho

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is to the Minister of Justice. Last week, in responding to a question from my honourable colleague for Yellowknife Centre, the Minister indicated that his department was studying the potential implications of the Belczowski decision. Can the Minister now advise the House as to the status of this review?

Question O180-12(2): Potential Implications Of Belczowski Versus Canada Court Decision
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 169

The Speaker

Minister of Justice, Mr. Patterson.

Return To Question O180-12(2): Potential Implications Of Belczowski Versus Canada Court Decision
Question O180-12(2): Potential Implications Of Belczowski Versus Canada Court Decision
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 169

Dennis Patterson Iqaluit

Mr. Speaker, I would have to tell the Member that it is still under way within my department. I could add that the matter was raised by the standing committee on legislation of this House at its meeting today, and I have been asked to get back to that committee on this very important issue related to their consideration of the plebiscite and other elections acts which are now before them. I would also note that the recent federal electoral boundaries commission also recommended that prisoners be permitted to vote in federal elections.

Mr. Speaker, my department is examining the federal ruling, and they are also examining just what kind of administrative procedures and changes would be required if we were to implement that ruling for territorial prisoners in facilities in the NWT and in the South. So the review is still under way, Mr. Speaker.

Return To Question O180-12(2): Potential Implications Of Belczowski Versus Canada Court Decision
Question O180-12(2): Potential Implications Of Belczowski Versus Canada Court Decision
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 169

The Speaker

Oral questions. Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

Question O181-12(2): Disposal Of GNWT Staff Houses
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 169

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Mr. Speaker, I would like to ask the Minister of Personnel once again in respect to his Minister's statement, does he intend to dispose of 49 of these units all at one time?

Question O181-12(2): Disposal Of GNWT Staff Houses
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 169

The Speaker

Minister of Personnel, Mr. Kakfwi.

Return To Question O181-12(2): Disposal Of GNWT Staff Houses
Question O181-12(2): Disposal Of GNWT Staff Houses
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 169

Stephen Kakfwi

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu

Mr. Speaker, the offer is to sell 49 units in Fort Smith to the people who are living in those units. If they choose to accept the offer, we will proceed to complete a sale. If they choose not to purchase these units or negotiate some way to lease-purchase, then they can continue staying in them and the future of those units will be addressed in June when we release our long-term housing strategy. Thank you.

Return To Question O181-12(2): Disposal Of GNWT Staff Houses
Question O181-12(2): Disposal Of GNWT Staff Houses
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 169

The Speaker

Oral questions. Mr. Nerysoo.

Question O182-12(2): Review Of Residency Requirement In Plebiscite Act
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

Richard Nerysoo Mackenzie Delta

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would like to ask the Minister of Justice a question supplementary to the question that Mr. Gargan asked on another item relating to the elections. I wanted to know if the honourable Member is asking his department to review the matter of the residency requirement that is being asked in the Plebiscite Act.

Question O182-12(2): Review Of Residency Requirement In Plebiscite Act
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

The Speaker

Minister of Justice, Mr. Patterson.

Return To Question O182-12(2): Review Of Residency Requirement In Plebiscite Act
Question O182-12(2): Review Of Residency Requirement In Plebiscite Act
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

Dennis Patterson Iqaluit

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I do recall that this very same issue of the validity of the residency requirement for the NWT Plebiscite Act was litigated around 1982 when the last territorial plebiscite was held. I would be pleased to provide Members of this House with a briefing on that decision, which I understand basically validated the residency requirement and which, I believe, would state the law as it now exists on that subject. So I will provide the Members with a briefing on that decision and its implications on the Plebiscite Act.

Return To Question O182-12(2): Review Of Residency Requirement In Plebiscite Act
Question O182-12(2): Review Of Residency Requirement In Plebiscite Act
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

The Speaker

Supplementary, Mr. Nerysoo.

Supplementary To Question O182-12(2): Review Of Residency Requirement In Plebiscite Act
Question O182-12(2): Review Of Residency Requirement In Plebiscite Act
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

Richard Nerysoo Mackenzie Delta

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The honourable Member will recall one of the reasons for not invalidating the requirement for the three-year residency was the fact that it was prior to the coming into force of the Charter of Rights. I think there have been subsequent rulings. So I would ask the honourable Member if he could have the appropriate research done into that particular matter.

Supplementary To Question O182-12(2): Review Of Residency Requirement In Plebiscite Act
Question O182-12(2): Review Of Residency Requirement In Plebiscite Act
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

The Speaker

Mr. Patterson.

Further Return To Question O182-12(2): Review Of Residency Requirement In Plebiscite Act
Question O182-12(2): Review Of Residency Requirement In Plebiscite Act
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

Dennis Patterson Iqaluit

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would be pleased to have that done, and I believe that request was also made by the standing committee on legislation at its meeting this morning. So yes, I will see that it is done as expeditiously as possible.

Further Return To Question O182-12(2): Review Of Residency Requirement In Plebiscite Act
Question O182-12(2): Review Of Residency Requirement In Plebiscite Act
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

The Speaker

Mr. Gargan.

Question O183-12(2): Hiring Of Ministers' Executive Assistants
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

Samuel Gargan Deh Cho

I would like to direct my question to the Government Leader with regard to the hiring of executive assistants. In the process of the selection of executive assistants, have these people applied for the positions and have they been successful in getting those positions, or are those direct appointments?

Question O183-12(2): Hiring Of Ministers' Executive Assistants
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

The Speaker

Madam Government Leader.

Return To Question O183-12(2): Hiring Of Ministers' Executive Assistants
Question O183-12(2): Hiring Of Ministers' Executive Assistants
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

Nellie Cournoyea Nunakput

Mr. Speaker, the executive assistants are chosen by the Ministers responsible because of their particular needs, and these are direct appointments.

Return To Question O183-12(2): Hiring Of Ministers' Executive Assistants
Question O183-12(2): Hiring Of Ministers' Executive Assistants
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

The Speaker

Mr. Todd.

Question O184-12(2): Allowing Non-residents To Purchase GNWT Staff Houses
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

John Todd Keewatin Central

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is to the Minister of Personnel with respect to this statement today on the sale of staff housing, which, by the way, I think is an excellent initiative. Should the current residents in the staff housing, government employees, not wish to purchase the units, has there been any consideration given in the policy to allowing others to purchase the units?

Question O184-12(2): Allowing Non-residents To Purchase GNWT Staff Houses
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

The Speaker

Mr. Kakfwi.

Return To Question O184-12(2): Allowing Non-residents To Purchase GNWT Staff Houses
Question O184-12(2): Allowing Non-residents To Purchase GNWT Staff Houses
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

Stephen Kakfwi

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu

No, Mr. Speaker.

Return To Question O184-12(2): Allowing Non-residents To Purchase GNWT Staff Houses
Question O184-12(2): Allowing Non-residents To Purchase GNWT Staff Houses
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

The Speaker

Mr. Nerysoo.

Question O185-12(2): Strategy For Sale Of GNWT Staff Houses
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

Richard Nerysoo Mackenzie Delta

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. If I might pursue the same question that Mr. Todd has just asked. Is the Minister considering that particular aspect in his strategy?

Question O185-12(2): Strategy For Sale Of GNWT Staff Houses
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

The Speaker

Mr. Kakfwi.

Return To Question O185-12(2): Strategy For Sale Of GNWT Staff Houses
Question O185-12(2): Strategy For Sale Of GNWT Staff Houses
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

Stephen Kakfwi

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu

Mr. Speaker, the future of these units, if they are not purchased by the present people living in them, we will be addressed in the long-term housing strategy that we hope to have for you in June. It will be considered and addressed at that time, I hope.

Return To Question O185-12(2): Strategy For Sale Of GNWT Staff Houses
Question O185-12(2): Strategy For Sale Of GNWT Staff Houses
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

The Speaker

Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would like to ask a question to the Minister responsible for public safety. The Minister announced in the House the day before yesterday in respect to appointing the committee to address the mining safety bill. In reviewing the Minister's statement it was noted that the individual who is to be chairman of this committee is from BC. I would like to ask the Minister, basically, if the individual is from BC, and does he reside in BC?

Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

The Speaker

Minister of Safety and Public Services, Mr. Patterson.

Return To Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

Dennis Patterson Iqaluit

Yes, Mr. Speaker. Thank you.

Return To Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

The Speaker

Supplementary, Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

Supplementary To Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Does the Minister feel he could not retain the expertise in the NWT and that he had to go out of the jurisdiction?

Supplementary To Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 170

The Speaker

Mr. Patterson.

Further Return To Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 171

Dennis Patterson Iqaluit

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I thought long and hard about this, because of course in most circumstances we would want to take advantage of the expertise of a resident in the NWT. However, the high expectations on the part of the stakeholders in the area of mining safety was that the new process to be put in place would be effective if the chairman was independent, and that led me to feel that any possible candidates from the NWT, although they would bring an element of local knowledge -- and a very important element of local knowledge -- to the committee, might be seen as coming to the committee with some kind of a bias, depending on their previous experience in one sector or another in the NWT.

So, Mr. Speaker, it was my judgment that in order to ensure objectivity and no one being involved that had an axe to grind, as it were, in this very controversial and sensitive area, that the advantages of appointing a neutral person from outside the Territories, especially with recent experience in developing progressive mine safety legislation in another jurisdiction, would outweigh the disadvantage of not having a Northerner as chair of this committee. It was a judgment call on my part, Mr. Speaker. Thank you.

Further Return To Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 171

The Speaker

Oral questions. Supplementary, Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

Supplementary To Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 171

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Mr. Speaker, since the Minister feels that we still need a lot of southern expertise that is biased to be able to develop the Mining Safety Act, I would like to ask the Minister, what is this process going to cost?

Supplementary To Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 171

The Speaker

Mr. Patterson.

Further Return To Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 171

Dennis Patterson Iqaluit

Well, Mr. Speaker, with the greatest respect to the Member, I did not say that we needed a biased southern expert. I said that one advantage of getting a person who is not from the jurisdiction is that they could not be accused of being biased or having an axe to grind, or carrying a particular agenda to the committee. That is, one guarantee of at least the appearance of independence would be to get somebody into this sensitive job who is not labelled as being associated with a particular mine, or a particular union, or a particular experience. It was exactly the opposite of my intention, which was to have an unbiased person in the chair.

Now, Mr. Speaker, with respect to the honourable Member's question about costs, the participants in this committee, I am happy to report -- that is, the members other than the chairperson -- will be responsible for their own costs, so the principal cost of this new consultation process will be the expenses of the chairperson. Mr. Speaker, the cost of employing the chairperson, who will be retained by the government, will depend on how long the committee takes to do its work. I am hopeful that if we have the right degree of good will and a business-like approach with this committee, it could be done within a couple of months; but at the moment, until the committee meets, I will not be able to estimate the length of time it will require, and therefore it will be difficult for me to estimate the total costs at this point. Thank you.

Further Return To Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 171

The Speaker

Oral questions. Supplementary, Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

Supplementary To Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 171

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Mr. Speaker, can the Minister tell this House, what is the cost or the rate of the chairperson's fee per day?

Supplementary To Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 171

The Speaker

Mr. Patterson.

Further Return To Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 171

Dennis Patterson Iqaluit

Mr. Speaker, the rate of remuneration for the chairperson of the mining safety bill committee will be appropriate to that person's professional qualifications. It will be the standard rate that is paid to a professional engineer -- I do not know how much it is, but whatever a professional engineer -- there is a scale of fees for experts, Mr. Speaker, which is probably well known to the honourable Member. I am not sure if it is a matter of privilege between that consultant and the government, Mr. Speaker, but it is what we would ordinarily pay a professional, in this case an engineer, for work of this kind. Thank you.

Further Return To Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Question O186-12(2): Residence Of Chairman Of Mining Safety Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 171

The Speaker

Mrs. Marie-Jewell, you have used up your supplementaries. You did. I have two people who counted. Oral questions. Oral questions. Mrs. Marie-Jewell, a new question.

Question O187-12(2): Responsibility For Costs Associated With Mining Safety Bill Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 171

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Under a new question, Mr. Speaker, my question is directed to the Minister of Safety and Public Services, and it is regarding the mining safety bill. Did the Minister indicate to this House that the Union of Northern Workers, Echo Bay Mines, and Polaris Mines will be absorbing the total costs for their members to be participants of the mining safety bill committee?

Question O187-12(2): Responsibility For Costs Associated With Mining Safety Bill Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 171

The Speaker

Mr. Patterson.

Return To Question O187-12(2): Responsibility For Costs Associated With Mining Safety Bill Committee
Question O187-12(2): Responsibility For Costs Associated With Mining Safety Bill Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 171

Dennis Patterson Iqaluit

Yes, Mr. Speaker.

Return To Question O187-12(2): Responsibility For Costs Associated With Mining Safety Bill Committee
Question O187-12(2): Responsibility For Costs Associated With Mining Safety Bill Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 171

The Speaker

Oral questions. Supplementary, Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

Supplementary To Question O187-12(2): Responsibility For Costs Associated With Mining Safety Bill Committee
Question O187-12(2): Responsibility For Costs Associated With Mining Safety Bill Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 171

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

With that in mind, Mr. Speaker, how can the Minister convince this House that committee will be unbiased?

Supplementary To Question O187-12(2): Responsibility For Costs Associated With Mining Safety Bill Committee
Question O187-12(2): Responsibility For Costs Associated With Mining Safety Bill Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 171

The Speaker

Mr. Patterson.

Further Return To Question O187-12(2): Responsibility For Costs Associated With Mining Safety Bill Committee
Question O187-12(2): Responsibility For Costs Associated With Mining Safety Bill Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 171

Dennis Patterson Iqaluit

Well, Mr. Speaker, I think there is a saying, "He who pays the piper calls the tune." I would think the honourable Member would be more persuaded that the members of the committee would be unbiased if they were paying their own costs, rather than if the government was paying their costs, and so I do not know why she suggests I need to persuade or convince the House that those four people, who are paying their own way because of their concern about mine safety, are somehow in the pockets of the

government. We are paying the chairperson, Mr. Speaker, because I believe it is the government's responsibility to put in place an independent and qualified person credible to all concerned who can do the job, but I am delighted that the four participants are willing to undertake their own expenses, and I wish we would see that more often in the Northwest Territories. Thank you.

Further Return To Question O187-12(2): Responsibility For Costs Associated With Mining Safety Bill Committee
Question O187-12(2): Responsibility For Costs Associated With Mining Safety Bill Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

The Speaker

Oral questions. Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

Further Return To Question O187-12(2): Responsibility For Costs Associated With Mining Safety Bill Committee
Question O187-12(2): Responsibility For Costs Associated With Mining Safety Bill Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Actually, I was happy that he answered the way he did because I did want him to allude to the fact that we were paying an independent chairperson, and I would like to know, how much is the Minister paying this independent chairperson?

Further Return To Question O187-12(2): Responsibility For Costs Associated With Mining Safety Bill Committee
Question O187-12(2): Responsibility For Costs Associated With Mining Safety Bill Committee
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

The Speaker

This is getting very close, I think -- it is really using a supplementary as follow-up to your old question, so I am afraid I will not be able to entertain that one, Mrs. Marie-Jewell. Oral questions. Mr. Lewis.

Question O188-12(2): Integration Of Housing Corporation Into Communities
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

Brian Lewis Yellowknife Centre

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I have a question for the Minister responsible for whatever the Housing Corporation is called now, because I understand it is going to be changed. Last week the Minister indicated that although he intends to get rid of the board of the Housing Corporation so that we can better integrate all government activities, and since housing, in fact, takes place in communities, I would like to ask the Minister, since he has indicated that at the local level Housing Corporation bodies will remain in place, since they will remain independent, how are they going to be better integrated into the economy of the community?

Question O188-12(2): Integration Of Housing Corporation Into Communities
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

The Speaker

Minister responsible for the Housing Corporation, Mr. Morin.

Return To Question O188-12(2): Integration Of Housing Corporation Into Communities
Question O188-12(2): Integration Of Housing Corporation Into Communities
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

Don Morin Tu Nedhe

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would like to assure the Member that the Housing Corporation is still called the Housing Corporation today. As far as the community organization, how it would be more effective -- and I did say last week in this House that we were not going to touch those organizations, and it is still my plan not to touch them immediately. That is going to be addressed through the community transfer agreements that the Minister responsible, Mr. Kakfwi, is responsible for. So it is my understanding that the housing authorities will continue to do the job they are doing now in the future, and once community transfer is made to the community local council, then it would be changed. That is my understanding. Thank you.

Return To Question O188-12(2): Integration Of Housing Corporation Into Communities
Question O188-12(2): Integration Of Housing Corporation Into Communities
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

The Speaker

Oral questions. Mr. Gargan.

Question O189-12(2): Highway Patrol Operations
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

Samuel Gargan Deh Cho

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would like to direct my question to the Minister of Transportation with regard to his response to the highway patrol operations by the department. In his response, Mr. Speaker, the Minister indicated that the officers are on patrol duty one eight-hour shift a week. What day of the week is that?

Question O189-12(2): Highway Patrol Operations
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

The Speaker

Minister of Transportation.

Question O189-12(2): Highway Patrol Operations
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

Titus Allooloo Amittuq

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, if I understood the question correctly, the Member is asking what other duties the patrol officers do in their day-to-day jobs.

Question O189-12(2): Highway Patrol Operations
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

The Speaker

Mr. Gargan, please restate the question.

Question O189-12(2): Highway Patrol Operations
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

Samuel Gargan Deh Cho

Mr. Speaker, the Minister in his response to me said the patrol officers spend one eight-hour shift a week patrolling. What day of the week are those patrols done?

Question O189-12(2): Highway Patrol Operations
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

The Speaker

Mr. Allooloo.

Question O189-12(2): Highway Patrol Operations
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

Titus Allooloo Amittuq

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I will take the question as notice.

Question O189-12(2): Highway Patrol Operations
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

The Speaker

The question is taken as notice. Mr. Gargan.

Question O190-12(2): Vehicle Accidents In The Nwt
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

Samuel Gargan Deh Cho

I would like to direct my question to the Minister responsible for Transportation. In his response with regard to the accidents occurring, the Minister said that Highways No. 1, No. 2 and No. 3 are the main transportation corridors in the NWT, on which 75 per cent of all accidents occur. Seventy-five per cent of what number?

Question O190-12(2): Vehicle Accidents In The Nwt
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

The Speaker

Minister of Transportation, Mr. Allooloo.

Return To Question O190-12(2): Vehicle Accidents In The Nwt
Question O190-12(2): Vehicle Accidents In The Nwt
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

Titus Allooloo Amittuq

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Seventy-five per cent of the total vehicle accidents that occur in the NWT.

Return To Question O190-12(2): Vehicle Accidents In The Nwt
Question O190-12(2): Vehicle Accidents In The Nwt
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

The Speaker

Supplementary, Mr. Gargan.

Supplementary To Question O190-12(2): Vehicle Accidents In The Nwt
Question O190-12(2): Vehicle Accidents In The Nwt
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

Samuel Gargan Deh Cho

I realize it is 75 per cent of all the accidents, but how many accidents? Seventy-five per cent of how many?

Supplementary To Question O190-12(2): Vehicle Accidents In The Nwt
Question O190-12(2): Vehicle Accidents In The Nwt
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

The Speaker

Mr. Allooloo.

Supplementary To Question O190-12(2): Vehicle Accidents In The Nwt
Question O190-12(2): Vehicle Accidents In The Nwt
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

Titus Allooloo Amittuq

Mr. Speaker, I do not have those figures with me at the moment. I will take the question as notice and get back to the Member tomorrow.

Supplementary To Question O190-12(2): Vehicle Accidents In The Nwt
Question O190-12(2): Vehicle Accidents In The Nwt
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

The Speaker

Oral questions. Mr. Zoe.

Question O191-12(2): Hamlet Of Rae-edzo Cash Flow Problems
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

Henry Zoe

Henry Zoe North Slave

Mahsi, Mr. Speaker. I want to direct my question to the Minister of Municipal and Community Affairs. Could the Minister give me an update on the status of the cash flow problem that the hamlet of Rae-Edzo was having?

Question O191-12(2): Hamlet Of Rae-edzo Cash Flow Problems
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

The Speaker

Mr. Minister.

Return To Question O191-12(2): Hamlet Of Rae-edzo Cash Flow Problems
Question O191-12(2): Hamlet Of Rae-edzo Cash Flow Problems
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 172

Dennis Patterson Iqaluit

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The honourable Member raised urgent questions in the last session of the Assembly about a surplus ground water problem that had strapped the municipality in its water system and resulted in financial problems. I was pleased that just after the session ended, arrangements were made for the Housing Corporation and the Department of Education to make contributions for the extra water and sewer requirements which had flowed from buildings they owned in Rae. My understanding is that those cash contributions have resolved the financial crisis that the honourable Member was concerned about when this matter last came up in the House. So my understanding is that the

hamlet is now back on a better footing.

Return To Question O191-12(2): Hamlet Of Rae-edzo Cash Flow Problems
Question O191-12(2): Hamlet Of Rae-edzo Cash Flow Problems
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 173

The Speaker

Supplementary, Mr. Zoe.

Supplementary Question O191-12(2): Hamlet Of Rae-edzo Cash Flow Problems
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 173

Henry Zoe

Henry Zoe North Slave

Mr. Speaker, could the Minister review with this department as to what is exactly going on with the cash flow of Rae-Edzo? Because my understanding is that the Housing Corporation and Public Works are disputing their accounts. I do not think it has been fully resolved.

Supplementary Question O191-12(2): Hamlet Of Rae-edzo Cash Flow Problems
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 173

The Speaker

Mr. Patterson.

Further Return To Question O191-12(2): Hamlet Of Rae-edzo Cash Flow Problems
Supplementary Question O191-12(2): Hamlet Of Rae-edzo Cash Flow Problems
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 173

Dennis Patterson Iqaluit

Mr. Speaker, I will be happy to review that again.

Further Return To Question O191-12(2): Hamlet Of Rae-edzo Cash Flow Problems
Supplementary Question O191-12(2): Hamlet Of Rae-edzo Cash Flow Problems
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 173

The Speaker

Oral questions. Mr. Lewis.

Question O192-12(2): MLA Involvement In Changes To The Plebiscite Question
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 173

Brian Lewis Yellowknife Centre

Mr. Speaker, my question is to the Minister responsible for Aboriginal Rights and Constitutional Development. He has indicated publicly on CBC today that he is prepared to allow some changes to the plebiscite direction, at least the question in it, if we can evolve some process. What does the Minister have in mind to involve Members of this Legislative Assembly in examining this question?

Question O192-12(2): MLA Involvement In Changes To The Plebiscite Question
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 173

The Speaker

Minister of Constitutional and Aboriginal Affairs, Mr. Kakfwi.

Return To Question O192-12(2): Mla Involvement In Changes To The Plebiscite Question
Question O192-12(2): MLA Involvement In Changes To The Plebiscite Question
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 173

Stephen Kakfwi

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu

Mr. Speaker, when I did these interviews yesterday, I remembered about 11:00 last night -- I guess it sort of hit me that I never finished the last part of the sentence on two occasions during the interview. In the interview I started out really well...

---Laughter

...that technically the Legislature, of course, has the political power to force a change to the wording of the plebiscite question. But politically it is almost impossible or unwise to tamper with it. I thought it was important to indicate that you can do that.

There are a couple of things that should be brought to people's attention here. One of the things is that the TFN agreement in principle was initialled in December, and before they initialled off, TFN was quite insistent that the plebiscite issue was sort of put to bed, resolved, so they could go into finalizing their claims package, knowing that Article 4, that part of the claim that deals with the creation of Nunavut, was clear. So as a cabinet we had dealt with the draft question in November, with the understanding that it had to be addressed quickly in order to meet the deadlines that TFN had set for themselves and meeting the commitments that we had made, relative to the spirit of Article 4 of the TFN agreement.

It should be mentioned as well that during the last Legislative Assembly, last summer in July, when the whole question of division and the creation of the Western Constitutional Commission came up, the Executive was mandated by this Legislative Assembly to proceed with the plebiscite. When we dealt with the Plebiscite Act and making amendments to it, at that session, there was a provision in the Plebiscite Act which provided for -- I think in 1985 it made it explicitly clear that the Legislative Assembly at that time was going to draft the question. In July, that provision was removed because it was outdated, and I think Members at that time felt -- knowing that TFN was going to be trying to finalize their claim in the early fall and they would be calling for a plebiscite in the early fall --that the Executive would be mandated to draft the question to deal with the plebiscite question.

That is the background to it. I wanted to make it clear that technically, politically you can have -- if there is a massive call for redrafting the question, we would have to adhere to it. I must draw to your attention -- with the best of intentions the government had made a commitment to TFN, as an aboriginal organization, in trying to help in finalizing their claims package -- that we made a commitment to them and I think we are politically bound very strongly to that.

Return To Question O192-12(2): Mla Involvement In Changes To The Plebiscite Question
Question O192-12(2): MLA Involvement In Changes To The Plebiscite Question
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 173

The Speaker

Oral questions. Supplementary, Mr. Lewis.

Supplementary To Question O192-12(2): Mla Involvement In Changes To Plebiscite Question
Question O192-12(2): MLA Involvement In Changes To The Plebiscite Question
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 173

Brian Lewis Yellowknife Centre

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would like to ask the Minister: Since several Ministers in this House, in fact, voted in favour of a plebiscite in Norman Wells in 1988, and at that time there was a proviso that our support for going ahead with this depended upon a number of conditions made by Members of the Legislature before they could support a question being put to the people of the Northwest Territories, is the Minister prepared to include those definite preconditions before we were prepared to accept that this plebiscite question be put to the people of the Northwest Territories with regard to cost, with regard to levels of service, and with regard to whatever capital infrastructure will have to be spent by the federal government for this to go ahead?

Supplementary To Question O192-12(2): Mla Involvement In Changes To Plebiscite Question
Question O192-12(2): MLA Involvement In Changes To The Plebiscite Question
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 173

The Speaker

Mr. Kakfwi.

Further Return To Question O192-12(2): Mla Involvement In Changes To Plebiscite Question
Question O192-12(2): MLA Involvement In Changes To The Plebiscite Question
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 173

Stephen Kakfwi

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu

Mr. Speaker, the general conditions under which most political leaders of the Western Arctic have indicated they would support division have been fairly consistent and fairly clear since 1980-81. Those conditions were that the constitutional future of the residents of the western territory would be fairly secure -- those are my own words -- before division would proceed. There would be some assurance that the level of service that is provided for people, that they are accustomed to, would not be adversely affected or disrupted in any major way. Also, a more recent arrival to the scene was the growing concern for the well-being of our government workers, that they would not be unfairly dealt with if division should occur. Those have been fairly consistent, and I think we have already taken those into account in drafting the question. They are provided in the preamble. Thank you.

Further Return To Question O192-12(2): Mla Involvement In Changes To Plebiscite Question
Question O192-12(2): MLA Involvement In Changes To The Plebiscite Question
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 173

The Speaker

Supplementary, Mr. Lewis.

Supplementary To Question O192-12(2): Mla Involvement In Changes To Plebiscite Question
Question O192-12(2): MLA Involvement In Changes To The Plebiscite Question
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 173

Brian Lewis Yellowknife Centre

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Since the preamble to the division question contains three selling points to promote a "yes" response to this question, presumably because it was at the request of TFN, would the Minister undertake to also include the guarantees that the people in the West have asked for, for a long time, that if this question is going to be supported by Members that we have those guarantees in that

question, or get rid of all preambles to the question so that we would not have any difficulty with our constituents who believe that we supported this on an understanding that in the West we would not have to pay for whatever consequences may emerge as a result of this question being supported by the majority of the people of the Northwest Territories?

Supplementary To Question O192-12(2): Mla Involvement In Changes To Plebiscite Question
Question O192-12(2): MLA Involvement In Changes To The Plebiscite Question
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 174

The Speaker

Mr. Kakfwi.

Further Return To Question O192-12(2): Mla Involvement In Changes To Plebiscite Question
Question O192-12(2): MLA Involvement In Changes To The Plebiscite Question
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 174

Stephen Kakfwi

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu

Mr. Speaker, I wonder how extensively we can go into these questions, because it is an issue that is in front of the committee of the whole. The plebiscite direction proclamation is tabled and is presently on our agenda in committee of the whole. I do not mind continuing here, but whether it should be continued or not --I can do that, but -- I guess I answered my own question.

I am of the view, and I think everybody should be, that this is not about wondering whether division will happen or not. We are going on the assumption that the call for division was answered in 1982. A plebiscite at that time said that the people of the North support division. This plebiscite is asking, based on the assurances in the preamble, are you going to support this particular line as a boundary for division? This is what it says. If it seems to be in the affirmative, it is perhaps not unlike some people's thinking; but it is trying to take a positive slant to what is going to be a very historic event. Thank you.

Further Return To Question O192-12(2): Mla Involvement In Changes To Plebiscite Question
Question O192-12(2): MLA Involvement In Changes To The Plebiscite Question
Item 5: Oral Questions

Page 174

The Speaker

If I could just clarify. Although in parliaments it is tradition that normally if something is before committee of the whole questions are normally not asked, our experience in this particular House, is that oftentimes documents before committee of the whole can stay before the committee for weeks and sometimes not even be dealt with. So in order to allow free flow of discussion, I am allowing those questions to be asked unless the document in question is being actively discussed in committee of the whole. Oral questions. Time has expired for oral questions. Item 6, written questions. Mr. Nerysoo.

Question W10-12(2): GNWT Guidelines For Northern-owned NWT Sawmills
Item 6: Written Questions

Page 174

Richard Nerysoo Mackenzie Delta

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I have a question to the Minister of Economic Development and Tourism:

1) Has the government issued any instructions to government departments regarding the purchase of lumber products from the Hay River Sawmill that was recently purchased by the Northwest Territories Development Corporation?

2) Will the same purchasing rules and guidelines apply to all northern-owned sawmills in the NWT?

3) Will the Government of the Northwest Territories support the purchase of the other sawmills in the NWT?

4) Will the government requirements for kiln-dried lumber be applicable to the Hay River Sawmill as they were previously required for northern sawmills, including the sawmill in Fort Resolution?

Question W10-12(2): GNWT Guidelines For Northern-owned NWT Sawmills
Item 6: Written Questions

Page 174

The Speaker

Written questions. Mr. Pudluk.

Question W11-12(2): Meeting Of Canadian Coast Guard Officials
Item 6: Written Questions

Page 174

Ludy Pudluk High Arctic

(Translation) Thank you, Mr. Speaker. This is directed to the Government Leader, and it is concerning Arctic Bay. NTCL usually meets with the hamlet council of Arctic Bay on which way they can travel in the winter or summer. They usually meet with the hamlet council. Would the Government Leader please find out if the meeting of Canadian Coast Guard officials regarding the seasonal route for transportation of ore from Arctic Bay to Nanisivik, which is scheduled for March 17 in Nanisivik, can be relocated to Arctic Bay?

Question W11-12(2): Meeting Of Canadian Coast Guard Officials
Item 6: Written Questions

Page 174

The Speaker

Written questions. Written questions.

Item 7, returns to written questions. Returns to written questions.

Item 8, replies to Opening Address. Replies to Opening Address. Item 9, petitions. Mr. Arngna'naaq.

Item 9: Petitions
Item 9: Petitions

Page 174

Silas Arngna'naaq Kivallivik

Mr. Speaker, I wish to take up my five minutes from yesterday's petitions.

Item 9: Petitions
Item 9: Petitions

Page 174

The Speaker

Proceed, Mr. Arngna'naaq.

Item 9: Petitions
Item 9: Petitions

Page 174

Silas Arngna'naaq Kivallivik

I would like to thank you first, Mr. Speaker, for giving me this opportunity to speak on Petition 3-12(2), as it was your error yesterday for not giving me the time. Mr. Speaker, I would like to use this time to make a few points on the petition. Presently the Wildlife Act does not permit the feeding of caribou or big game to dogs within the community. The community of Baker Lake is the only inland Inuit community in the Northwest Territories, with a population of approximately 1200 people, the majority of which are natives of the area.

There are three main uses of dogs in Baker Lake. Pet dogs are kept by some families, indoors and outdoors for various reasons. Racing dogs are bred for recreational purposes. Working dogs, which is the third use of dogs, are also bred for hunting and fishing. Some hunters are using dog teams to hunt and to fish, as it is very expensive to hunt by snowmobile. It costs approximately $32.20 to purchase 10 gallons of gas, plus $8.45 for one quart of oil. A snowmobile drive belt can be as high as $66.32 each. Therefore, a hunter going out for a day on a snowmobile will pay approximately $111. This does not include the price of food for the trip, which could be in the neighbourhood of $40 per person.

We, in Baker Lake, have no marine mammals to feed our dogs. The coastal communities have seals, walruses and whales to feed their dogs, but we have none of these in Baker Lake. All we have is caribou, musk-oxen and fish. Most dog team owners cannot afford to buy fishing nets or other gear needed to fish for their dogs; therefore the people of Baker Lake need to feed their dogs caribou meat. The Baker Lake Hunters and Trappers Association, on behalf of the community of Baker Lake, have therefore sent me a petition, asking me to have the present Wildlife Act, subsection 57(2), changed to be able to feed their dogs caribou meat and not break the law. I thereby submitted a petition yesterday signed by 103 residents of Baker Lake. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

---Applause

Item 9: Petitions
Item 9: Petitions

Page 174

The Speaker

Thank you, Mr. Arngna'naaq. Petitions. Petitions. Item 10, reports of standing and special committees. Reports of standing and special committees. Mr. Todd.

Committee Report 3-12(2): Report Of The Standing Committee On Finance
Item 10: Reports Of Standing And Special Committees

Page 175

John Todd Keewatin Central

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The standing committee on finance is pleased to present its report on the review of the 1992-93 capital estimates. Good financial management should not be something we just talk about; it should be something we do. If we do not do something now, this government will be $38l million in debt by March 31,1995. More people will be homeless, uneducated and out of jobs. That is the bad news, and it is a sobering thought. The standing committee on finance wants the Legislative Assembly, the civil service and the public to clearly recognize this problem.

The good news is, we can change it. That is why we are here. Not just by talking about it but by taking responsible, results-oriented action. Our stakeholders, the public, investors, the federal government, to name just a few, want to see a well thought out recovery plan to turn this government around in these leaner times. Our stakeholders want to see a plan that will ensure that this government will be in a modest surplus position by March of 1995 and that more people will have homes, more people will be educated, and more people will be employed. And they, the stakeholders, the public, want to see what is planned to ensure the basic needs of our constituencies are met. They will, and should, hold us all accountable when they next vote.

---Applause

It is incumbent on the standing committee on finance to offer criticism to our colleagues in cabinet, provided that criticism is constructive and done professionally. If we are going to criticize, we must also offer possible solutions.

During the week of February 11, 1992, the committee expressed a number of serious concerns with the capital estimates in advance of the Minister of Finance's budget. This was done to give the government the opportunity to review our recommendations and determine an appropriate course of action. We are pleased that the cabinet responded to our concerns and demonstrated a will to work with the committee. Of course, some of the responses, Mr. Speaker, may not have gone far enough, in our opinion, but we respect the decisions, and these matters we will bring forth in the coming days when we address the budget. This report reflects these same concerns, and reflects the guiding principles of this committee; that is, the need for fairness and good value for public money.

Some of the major issues of concern include: the Department of Education's budget in many respects; public housing; the Departments of Economic Development and Tourism, and Transportation in general; specific matters in other departments and related matters of principle which we will deal with in the departmental reviews; a general lack of vigilance in spending; and the responsibility to ensure that the effects of balancing the budget are not placed on the backs of those people who are most in need.

---Applause

Mr. Speaker, it is important to remember that this budget is a creation of past and present governments. None of us can abdicate our responsibilities. Government should and must respect previous commitments which are still justified prior to proceeding with new initiatives.

---Applause

It is the committee's observation that departments tend to be activity-driven, not results-driven. There are numerous examples of this, but the most obvious is the Department of Education, which measures success by statistics with little reference to achievement. Current graduation statistics and comparative testing show quite the opposite. In order that we may make our decisions in light of all the facts, it is the committee's intention to incorporate results measures in future reports to the Legislative Assembly. This is consistent with the position of the previous standing committee on finance. All departments and agencies must be challenged to achieve more with less, not just do more.

Special Warrants Approval Process Needs Improvement

We also want to be assured that immediately after this capital budget is approved in the Assembly, the government does not issue many special warrants, as was past practice. This concern is, again, consistent with the previous standing committee on finance, who raised the use of special warrants, abusing the process and circumventing the Assembly.

---Applause

A method has to be determined to include the committee's involvement in the approval process of special warrants.

It is the committee's belief that developing a long-term strategy with respect to our financial obligations must be a priority. Long-term planning is essential to good government. It is essential that with future capital budgets, a multi-year plan be presented. When capital estimates come in front of the committee again in October, we will want to see a five-year plan.

---Applause

Cabinet should also consider doing a thorough evaluation of the capital management planning and allocation process. It is obvious to this committee that the current system is not working as well as it should. Finally, and I have said it many times, the committee does not want the burden of balancing the budget to fall on the backs of the people who are in most need...

---Applause

...the homeless, the unemployed, the uneducated in small communities and in large. In coming up with our recommendations the committee considered that if sacrifices must be made, they must come from areas of surplus and enhancements; things we might like to do but cannot really afford to do.

If we cannot afford it, maybe we should not be renting four boardrooms where two will do; maybe we should not be building large arenas when medium arenas are satisfactory; enhancing a park or paving a road, and the list goes on and on. If we cannot afford it, then do not buy it.

The standing committee on finance feels that there is a need for fundamental change in the way that the government does things. We want to be a part of the process, with the Legislative Assembly, to bring about this change for the benefit of all Northerners.

---Applause

It is obvious that a long-term action plan is essential if we are to determine what our short and long-term financial obligations are. This, in the committee's opinion, should be the priority. We are prepared to work with cabinet to achieve this. We propose that cabinet and ordinary Members of the Legislative Assembly undertake a one-week strategic planning workshop in order to develop a shared vision that we can all work toward. This is unprecedented in other Assemblies.

---Applause

We cannot continue to run this government without some indication of what our priorities are, how we are going to achieve them, who is going to get us there, and what it ultimately costs. The responsibility lies with all of us. The challenge is our ability to look beyond constituency interests and determine what is in the best interest of all Northerners.

---Applause

The standing committee on finance accepts this challenge and awaits your response. We must be part of a solution, not part of the problem.

---Applause

Mr. Speaker, the standing committee on finance respectfully submits a list of 52 recommendations for consideration of this Assembly. Specific concerns have also been identified in the departmental reviews which are part of this report.

Motion To Move Committee Report 3-12(2) To Committee Of The Whole, Carried

Mr. Speaker, that concludes the report and, therefore, I move that the report of the standing committee on finance be received and moved into committee of the whole for discussion, in conjunction with Bill 14. Thank you.

---Applause

Committee Report 3-12(2): Report Of The Standing Committee On Finance
Item 10: Reports Of Standing And Special Committees

Page 176

The Speaker

Is there a seconder to the motion? Mr. Zoe. Your motion is in order. All those in favour? All those opposed? The motion is carried.

---Carried

CR 3-12(2) will be put into committee of the whole today. Reports of standing and special committees. Item 11, reports of committees on the review of bills. Mr. Arngna'naaq.

Item 11: Reports Of Committees On The Review Of Bills
Item 11: Reports Of Committees On The Review Of Bills

Page 176

The Speaker

Report Of The Standing Committee On Legislation On The Review Of Bill 8, Bill 10 And Bill 11

Item 11: Reports Of Committees On The Review Of Bills
Item 11: Reports Of Committees On The Review Of Bills

Page 176

Silas Arngna'naaq Kivallivik

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I wish to report to the Assembly that the standing committee on legislation has reviewed Bills 8, 10 and 11, and wishes to report that Bills 8, 10 and 11 are now ready for committee of the whole. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Item 11: Reports Of Committees On The Review Of Bills
Item 11: Reports Of Committees On The Review Of Bills

Page 176

The Speaker

Pursuant to Rule 66(3), Bills 8, 10 and 11 are ordered into committee of the whole. Reports of committees on the review of bills.

Item 12, tabling of documents.

Item 13, notices of motions.

Item 14, notices of motions for first reading of bills.

Item 15, motions. Item 16, first reading of bills. Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

Item 11: Reports Of Committees On The Review Of Bills
Item 11: Reports Of Committees On The Review Of Bills

Page 176

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Mr. Speaker, I seek unanimous consent to return to written questions.

Item 11: Reports Of Committees On The Review Of Bills
Item 11: Reports Of Committees On The Review Of Bills

Page 176

The Speaker

The honourable Member is asking for unanimous consent to return to Item 6, written questions. Are there any nays? There are no nays. Proceed, Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

Question W12-12(2): Costs For Chairpersons Of Boards, Agencies And Committees
Revert To Item 6: Written Questions

Page 176

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Thank you, Members.

Will the Government Leader provide to this House the amount paid for the present expertise of the chairmen for all boards, agencies and committees?

Will the Government Leader provide the following: 1) the rate of pay; 2) the daily rate of indemnity and daily allowances; and 3) the amounts paid for all chairpersons in 1991-92? Thank you.

Question W12-12(2): Costs For Chairpersons Of Boards, Agencies And Committees
Revert To Item 6: Written Questions

Page 176

The Speaker

Written questions. Written questions.

Return to Item 16, first reading of bills. First reading of bills.

Item 17, second reading of bills. Second reading of bills. Item 18, consideration in committee of the whole of bills and other matters: Tabled Document 9-12(2), Strength at Two Levels; Tabled Document 10-12(2), Reshaping Northern Government; Tabled Document 12-12(2), Plebiscite Direction; Bill 14, Appropriation Act, No. 1, 1992-93; and Committee Report 3-12(2), Review of the 1992-93 Capital Estimates, with Mr. Arvaluk in the chair.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 176

The Chair James Arvaluk

This committee has come to order. Yesterday we were on Tabled Document 9-l2(2), page 18 of the Strength at Two Levels report. We will break for 15 minutes before we proceed. Thank you.

---SHORT RECESS

Tabled Document 9-12(2), "Strength At Two Levels"

The Chair recognizes a quorum. Once again, I would like to thank all the Members for being so prompt in returning to the House. The committee now resumes dealing with Tabled Document 9-12(2), Strength at Two Levels report, on page 18. Any comments on page 18? Mr. Todd.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 176

John Todd Keewatin Central

Thank you, Mr. Chairman On page 18 we talk about the amalgamation of the Northwest Territories Power Corporation and petroleum products. I have some concerns about that, as I have expressed in the past, and I would like to try and express them today. Power and fuel are two essential services that none of us can live without. The Northwest Territories Power Corporation is currently controlled in terms of the charges back through the Public Utilities Board. I have a kind of an uneasy feeling that we are putting two essential services under one umbrella, and yet when we did a review of government through the Strength at Two Levels report, we never really did a review of the NWT Power Corporation to determine if, in fact, it is being run as efficiently as has been suggested. I am not convinced, and I have spoken to Mr. Pollard on this, but I am not convinced that we should be amalgamating both these departments at this time until we get a better handle on the efficiency level of the current NWT Power Corporation.

One of the standing committee on finance's recommendations -- and maybe I am letting the cat out of the bag -- but one of the recommendations in the report is that we should fast-track the possibility of selling off, as has been suggested by the Minister of Finance, the NWT Power Corporation. So I have some concerns about the fact that we would be moving POL into that jurisdiction, and if we can get an agreement in this House, to fast-track -- if, as I say, we can get an agreement to fast-track the privatization of NWT Power, how that would affect the communities and the costs and the charge-back accordingly. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 177

The Chair James Arvaluk

Ms. Cournoyea.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 177

Nellie Cournoyea Nunakput

Mr. Chairman, in looking at that recommendation, it is my understanding that this recommendation was a recommendation supported by the previous standing committee on finance. Before the purchasing of fuel is incorporated with the Power Corporation, we are embarking on a study to see just how viable all that is, so I would be prepared to probably offer the terms of reference on the study, and also keep you up to date on the study team, on how they feel it can be done. The decision has not been made to carry out that task because we do not have all the facts and all the figures and what it would mean. But I think some of the arguments that were previously made is that the Power Corporation is one of the largest purchasers of fuel, and the government for public housing, et cetera, and so in combining those there may be some cost savings; also in incorporating the storage tank facility that each group has.

So I would be prepared to provide the terms of reference on how we will be looking at this possibility of incorporation. In terms of fast-tracking the Power Corporation, I have not done an update at this point in time on rescheduling, on how we are going to do that. So as soon as we embark on that, I think it is part of the implementation, and it is not something that is decided, because I do not know if the Power Corporation, once we look at what to do, whether they really want it or not. So I will be prepared to pass those studies, as it goes on, to the Member.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 177

The Chair James Arvaluk

Mr. Todd.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 177

John Todd Keewatin Central

Thank you. I recognize that the previous standing committee on finance did recommend this; however, we have a new standing committee on finance, and it might want to take a different position. I guess that is the one point I want to make. Let me try again. I guess my concern would be, it seems to me these two essential services are ones that we all need, and a reflection of the charge-back is a reflection of the way in which they run -- the cost of producing the product, whether it is petroleum or whatever. It is my understanding, and somebody correct me if I am wrong, that a subsidization program is in place, particularly with the purchase of fuel, et cetera. I have some difficulty in understanding, if we put it into an independent power corporation, given that we require petroleum products almost 12 months of the year and it is an essential service, it seems to me that it is putting a tremendous amount of clout in one particular group of directors or one particular corporation. I am not sure that is in the best interests of the public and I am not sure it is in the best interest of the Eastern Arctic. Cost savings are important, and I do recognize that, and there is a way, perhaps, in which we could amalgamate bulk fuel purchasing; but I have not heard a convincing argument yet, especially in my northern health discussions, that the NWT Power Corporation is going to be able to run it any more efficiently or less efficiently than what it currently is.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 177

The Chair James Arvaluk

Any Minister want to respond to that? Ms. Cournoyea.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 177

Nellie Cournoyea Nunakput

I think that in everything we do, whether it is the Power Corporation or Health and Social Services, these questions should be answered as we go along. First of all, there is a study going on to see how that can be done and what has to be done before we even embark on trying to put those two tasks together, so that will be available. At this point in time, I do not even know whether, once we shake it out, the Power Corporation would even think that it is a good thing to do; so as we go along I can assure the honourable Member that, while we are looking to implementing and co-ordinating these tasks, the information will be brought forward as we go along, because we just do not know all the answers to those questions, and it is quite valid in what is being presented right now.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 177

The Chair James Arvaluk

As Members may have noticed, our lobby is beautifully decorated today. The fine artwork that adorns the walls commemorates Canada's 125th birthday, according to some. An awards presentation for the Canada Day poster competition will be taking place in the lobby in just a few minutes. I would ask all Members to join me for this presentation; therefore, the committee will recess for a few minutes. The bells will ring to bring the committee back to order.

---SHORT RECESS

The committee will come to order. We are dealing with Tabled Document 9-12(2), Strength at Two Levels. Page 18. Mr. Todd.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 177

John Todd Keewatin Central

Mr. Chairman, if you will give me a couple of minutes, I have lost my train of thought.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 177

The Chair James Arvaluk

Mr. Lewis.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 177

Brian Lewis Yellowknife Centre

Thank you. Since the train has already left without Mr. Todd...

---Laughter

...I will jump on the back of it and indicate to this committee that if there was anything in this report that caught my eye immediately it was the fact that there was a proposal to have the Northwest Territories Power Corporation assume responsibility of the distribution of petroleum products.

I looked at the words carefully, and I wondered what was meant by distribution. We see the word "amalgamation" and so on, and then if you look at the exact word it just says "distribution." When I looked at this originally, I could see the Northwest Territories Power Corporation being a mammoth consumer of diesel oil. It would be a pretty monolithic and huge corporation if, in fact, it not only was responsible for the distribution of power but was responsible also for the distribution of all other fuels for the production of energy.

My background, Mr. Chairman, makes me very, very uneasy about monopolies, especially when you look at potential for the only really significant utility which could have a major implication for the development of our economy. We all know that if you are going to develop any kind of base beyond just very, very simple manufacturing, you really have to look to this kind of utility if you want to develop an industrial base of any kind, even a very modest one. This proposal to amalgamate POL with the Power Corporation bothers me at that level, simply putting it with a corporation under its current structure. It frightens me when I consider the possibility of the whole thing being privatized, because then you would really have the monopoly that gives me nightmares.

We all know, for example, that in half of our territory, the area in the Eastern Arctic, there is a complete dependence on diesel for the generation of power. Right now we have a system in place which provides a degree of protection for those people; and it is in our interest, in fact, to keep a corporate structure together as long as we can, and to make sure that the interests of those people who are highly dependent on diesel is protected.

I am always interested in hearing good solid arguments for doing something. Like my colleagues here, I do not want to put up false fences against something that will change things, advance us and improve things. I think that would be a terrible mistake. But when you see a development like this to which you really cannot judge any advantage -- when you look at the way it is being proposed, you try to figure out what is going to be gained if we are to go that route. For example, if now the corporation assumes this responsibility for purchasing power, I can see ways in which, perhaps, we could begin looking at developing ports in places, and identifying these great oil tankers on the sea somewhere and dragging them into some northern place and have them off-load their oil, and so on. There are all kinds of visions that you can have on how things could be different.

The major concern that all of us really have with this -- I will give just one example of something that is just a minor detail, perhaps, but currently if the government purchases oil and sells it, then we are somewhat exempt from different levies such as GST and so on. It does not affect us. If the corporation were to take it over and this was to be considered just another one of their purchases, then they would automatically have to pay those taxes.

Danger Of Huge Monopoly

My major concern, Mr. Chairman, is that I see a real danger in developing a monolith, some huge monopoly, which has tremendous potential for doing things which may not be in the interest of all the people of the Northwest Territories. In looking at this document, that is what we have to bear in mind; not what may help one little area or one little region, but what is best for all of the people of the Northwest Territories. There are some things here which do not give me the kind of satisfaction, if you like, that we would be serving all the best interests of all of the people in the Territories, if we were to put these two things together, and do it in such a way that there are no real advantages for everybody. Thank you.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 178

The Chair James Arvaluk

Ms. Cournoyea.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 178

Nellie Cournoyea Nunakput

Mr. Chairman, as I said, this is an area that is being explored. Whether we actually do it or not is another thing, as we go along exploring whether this is the best thing to do. I was hoping that the Member would be able to give me more insight, because it is my understanding he was a deputy chairman of the last standing committee on finance which did make the recommendation that this is a task that could be undertaken by the Power Corporation. In light of changes, I suppose the primary objective, to my understanding, is that the Power Corporation orders its own fuel and has its own tanks. Government Services orders its own fuel for communities and has its own tanks. We had a large number of new projects to develop new tankage in communities which cost a great deal of money, and there was some question whether the Power Corporation was fully utilizing the tanks they did have, or whether they could be incorporated for their needs and the needs of distribution of fuel services to communities. The idea is exactly what the Member has suggested; that is, to look at it where it would best serve all of the people in the Northwest Territories if we were going to consolidate and cut the costs of building two structures.

I think the study is going to go on, and I am not quite sure how it will break out in the end, but all that information will be made available through the proper process, Mr. Chairman.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 178

The Chair James Arvaluk

Mr. Lewis.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 178

Brian Lewis Yellowknife Centre

Mr. Chairman, not as a point of order but as a point of information for Members, there were many things that the previous standing committee on finance approved that I was personally not in favour of, but it was always our policy to show a united front whenever we went to this House. I am publicly on record as being against our participation in Seville, even though that committee was supposed to be in support of it. I use that as one example, but there were lots of others.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 178

The Chair James Arvaluk

Does anyone want to respond to that? If not, Mr. Zoe.

Designing Producer Support Programs To Support Viable Domestic Economy

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 178

Henry Zoe

Henry Zoe North Slave

Mr. Chairman, I want to make some comments on this report, particularly under this heading, "Finding of the Review Project." Mr. Chairman, it states that, "The North and the people of northern communities are now in the middle of a long period of transition in which permanent communities and a more modern economy will be the dominant features of life. At this stage, however, the transition is not successful and the modern North is largely a 'welfare economy.'"

Mr. Chairman, this perspective on the North and its aboriginal population sounds like a statement one would find during the days when the North was managed by Ottawa and they had little or no understanding or appreciation of northern aboriginal culture and economy. Mr. Chairman, where does support for the domestic economy and traditional culture and values fit into this perspective? "A transition" to what? A southern economy based on industrial production and wage labour?

The report goes on to say that the project review group read the SCONE report and they are closely in line with the findings of the SCONE report. Mr. Chairman, the project group could not have possibly read and understood the background study prepared for the SCONE committee called "Strategy for Supporting the Domestic Economy of the Northwest Territories." If the project group had read and understood the recommendations of this report, they would not have been so insensitive in respect to the domestic economy and the importance of government transfer payments as a form of producer support, although most inadequate at this point.

Mr. Chairman, I see nothing in this report that approaches this question of redesigning our social welfare programs so they can be used to finance the production of food from the land. I agree with the authors of the report that welfare in itself tends to erode, rather than enforce, cultural values. However, the answer is not necessarily a modern northern economy that mirrors the industrial wage economy in southern Canada.

Mr. Chairman, the answer lies in designing producer support programs that channel a portion of welfare payments into supporting a strong and viable domestic economy. I just wanted to make those comments. Mahsi cho.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 179

The Chair James Arvaluk

If there is no response to that, Mr. Todd.

Proposed Amalgamation Of NWT Power Corporation

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 179

John Todd Keewatin Central

I do not want to leave the proposed amalgamation of the NWT Power Corporation. I have no argument with the fact that you have to find a way to utilize POL tanks or NWT Power Corporation tanks, et cetera. But I do not think that is the reason for putting them together. We could do that now; a government policy could be developed. The superintendent at the local level along with the government representative could find some method to utilize the existing tanks. I have a problem with that. But that is not my argument.

My argument, or my concern, is similar to Mr. Lewis'. We are putting a terrible amount of power -- if you will excuse the pun -- and a terrible amount of influence under the one umbrella. I am not sure, for example, what would the Public Utilities Board's role would be if POL was under the NWT Power Corporation. What is its role in this thing? I am not convinced the NWT Power Corporation is being run efficiently. Some are; but I am not.

I find it interesting that there is no -- I cannot find it, anyway --but with respect to this NWT Power Corporation, there is no privatization component to it in the report. Let us sell it; let us run it more efficiently. I am told that it can be done by some people. I do not know. I do not see any reference to it in this report. All I see a reference to is making it bigger.

So the issue of utilization of tankage, bulk buying of fuel -- they are administrative problems that could be solved. The real issue is, what is it going to cost us and who controls it? So I am wondering if somebody could advise me on -- hypothetically, if this took place, how would we see it being controlled with respect to its charge-back to the client? I wonder if the Government Leader could give me some indication, if we were to fast-track the privatization of the Power Corporation, how would POL have been affected there? I am a little unclear on that. So I wonder about the protective mechanism to ensure that the charges are appropriate, and the PUB is currently performing that function, I understand, for the NWT Power Corporation. I believe Mr. Pollard said himself that if we sold the Power Corporation we could solve our deficit problem.

So I wonder what the Government Leader's position would be on should, -- and again hypothetically -- we privatize the Power Corporation, where would POL fit in on this privatization thrust? Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 179

The Chair James Arvaluk

Thank you. Government Leader.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 179

Nellie Cournoyea Nunakput

Mr. Chairman, at this point in time I cannot answer that question. I think that is one of the questions that has to be addressed as we look at these two tasks and whether it is appropriate to move in that direction. So I am sorry, but right now I am not qualified to answer those questions.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 179

The Chair James Arvaluk

Mr. Todd.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 179

John Todd Keewatin Central

These two very important questions; that is, what is the controlling instrument of the NWT Power Corporation/POL, and are they currently being looked at in the development of this amalgamation plan? Are they being looked at in terms of what the role of the PUB would be, and how we would view POL, should it come about and we sell the Power Corporation, as hopefully we will get support for? Has that been looked at in the current discussions that have taken place with these two departments?

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 179

The Chair James Arvaluk

Government Leader.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 179

Nellie Cournoyea Nunakput

Mr. Chairman, if those questions have not been addressed in this task, I will make sure that they do get addressed.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 179

The Chair James Arvaluk

Thank you. Any further general comments on page 18? Mr. Pudlat.

Northern Regions Fear Amalgamation Of Petroleum, Oil Lubricants And NWT Power Corporation

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 179

Kenoayoak Pudlat Baffin South

(Translation) I, too, would like to speak on page 18. We are representatives of the NWT as legislators. We represent the northern regions, and because of that fact I tend to keep saying that the smaller communities within this report, Strength at Two Levels, have a fear, particularly dealing with POL and the amalgamation of the NWTPC. I am wondering, at the very start perhaps it would proceed very well should there be an amalgamation, but we have to look further into the future to see if it might not proceed as well as it might be intended.

My question, then, is to the Government Leader. You indicated that a review process is being undertaken, and I wonder when you will be able to pass on this information. As a last comment, while this information is being researched, I would like to be provided with the details.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 179

The Chair Ludy Pudluk

Thank you. Government Leader.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 179

Nellie Cournoyea Nunakput

Mr. Chairman, I think this is what all the process is about right now. In terms of supplying energy or power to communities, what we do is that the Power Corporation charges a rate to home-owners or to their clients and it is subsidized at the Yellowknife rate. That is what exists today, and I think that one of the concerns is that we maintain that, but at this point in time, certainly in terms of rate structures, how the Power Corporation charges those rates, that presently, I believe, will soon be under review by the Public Utilities Board, so that will be in the spring. The commitment by the Power Corporation when we took out the work; that is, the different stages that we had to move through in terms of the task of looking at what is presently in POL and how that will be handled, that information will be available to all MLAs and also to the working group and to the standing committees, as it comes forward. Certainly the questions of concern will be addressed in those reviews. So yes, I will provide the information as soon as it comes forward, and we can have additional information sessions if the information is more than reading material.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 179

The Chair Ludy Pudluk

Member for Thebacha.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 179

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I did want to make a couple of comments in respect to the areas of program and program delivery. There is a suggestion in the report that the use of co-payment and means-testing possible in the delivery of social assistance programs be introduced and increased; and in respect to that, I guess what I would like to ask is, in what areas does the government feel that the author of this book recommended that they introduce or increase the use of co-payments and means-testing, particularly when it comes to social programs?

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 179

The Chair Ludy Pudluk

Thank you. Government Leader.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 179

Nellie Cournoyea Nunakput

Mr. Chairman, I cannot answer that question because I do not recall exactly which areas they had suggested to look at. I cannot answer the question at this time.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 179

The Chair Ludy Pudluk

Thank you. Member for

Thebacha.

Co-Payments And Means-Testing

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 180

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Mr. Chairman, I guess the reason I asked is because I am concerned about this recommendation. I think we will probably be one of the only jurisdictions in Canada that would look at implementing some type of thing like this, and I am concerned, when trying to address social programs in a universal manner, that you start also addressing them in a means-testing approach that at times takes away from the intent of the purpose of the social program, so I would like to suggest, and I would like to point out, that they certainly look at this with caution and that we do not start setting precedents to delivering social programs on a means-testing basis.

The other comment that I did want to make, Mr. Chairman, is in respect to the employment development and income support co-ordination. It states that consideration be given to establishing a department of education and employment with a mandate for delivering all of the programs related to employment development and income support, including social assistance. I have to state that I certainly do not agree with that at all. I find that you may be using a lot of your social assistance funding for development of employment programs, and that was not the intent of social assistance to begin with. The intent of social assistance, in my mind, was the fact that the federal government basically stated that people in need can be provided with social assistance to cover some of their basic needs that they need to live and cope with society. If you start looking at tinkering with social assistance and placing it into employment development, and looking at income support, you are doing away with the initial intention of social assistance, and I think you will be asking for a horrendous increase in costs. I think that is totally unfair to a recipient who basically needs social assistance to cover the basics, with no intention of employment development in their career path. There are many people who could be illiterate or that fall into this category, so I do want to stress that I do not agree with the idea of social assistance being placed in with the Department of Education, because social assistance was not meant to be in the Department of Education. It is meant to be in the Department of Social Services, to provide for a fundamental need to residents, and I strongly recommend against that. Those are basically my comments that I do have in respect to page 18, Mr. Chairman. Thank you.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 180

The Chair Ludy Pudluk

Thank you. Government Leader.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 180

Nellie Cournoyea Nunakput

Mr. Chairman, I believe those are comments from the Member that have to be weighed in our deliberations in what we do in the implementation.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 180

The Chair Ludy Pudluk

Thank you. Further general comments on page 18. Page 19. Member for Thebacha.

Concerns About Arctic College

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 180

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I did have a few comments in respect to the top part of page 19 on Arctic College. The authors of the report indicated that the campus structure of the college be rationalized. I totally agree with that recommendation. I just feel that, first of all, the college has evolved to the point where they have six campuses across the Territories, and I do not believe that our financial environment will allow us to continue in that route. I believe the structure of the college has to be rationalized for the amount of funding we are giving and going to be looking at in the future.

There is a lot of concern about the fact that there is duplication of courses being delivered at these colleges, and it is starting to not only cost a lot, but you are at times delivering the types of courses that could be delivered with different methods used. I take, for example, the social services course. Apparently there is one being delivered at Iqaluit campus and one at Thebacha, and I have been advised that the one in Iqaluit has good community concepts in the course, whereas the one at Thebacha has good theory concepts being delivered in the course, so they are not being delivered in the same fashion and in the same manner, and I think this must be somewhat difficult for people to decide what course they want to go and take.

I feel that the campus structure of the college has grown to the point where I do not think this government can afford to continue to keep dealing with Arctic College in the way that it has been. I think we have to look at the financial reality that we are in, and there is no doubt, in my opinion, that there should be only two colleges in the North. I have always said that. There should be one in the East and one in the West. Without hesitation, I state that the college in the West should be in Fort Smith because that is where it began.

Mr. Chairman, the other area I want to talk about is that the college is certainly looking at funding priorities for adult basic upgrading. I certainly find that with the high rate of illiteracy in the Territories, it is a necessity. I want to indicate that I certainly support the adult basic upgrading, but I do not believe that these adult basic upgrading courses should mean that there should be a campus at these locations. I am of the opinion that adult basic upgrading should be part of the school system program and question whether or not it should be part of Arctic College. This decision was made a few years ago.

Some of the problems I have come to recognize since this course has been placed in Arctic College are that it is encouragement for young students to drop out of school when they get to the grade 10 level, knowing that if they wait for a couple of years they can go to Arctic College and obtain access to the student programs which will pay them to learn. I think this is wrong. I believe we have to look at reconsidering whether or not the adult basic upgrading should be defined in criteria or look at the idea that it should stay with other grade levels as opposed to the secondary level of education. These are my comments on Arctic College, Mr. Chairman.

"Northwest Territories Way" Of Concern To Constituents

My comments with respect to health services and facilities, I am very, very concerned about the Department of Health being given the encouragement to continue with the "Northwest Territories Way." I have heard many concerns expressed by my constituents with regard to the implementation of the "Northwest Territories Way." They feel that the model for the delivery system and rationalization for hospital facilities is looked at totally with the idea to do away with some particular hospitals in the Territories that have been in place for years by downgrading them to small nursing stations. I do not think this is right. Further discussion of the "Northwest Territories Way" has to take place in this House because of the fact that it is a very important model being proposed by the health delivery system.

Mr. Chairman, as I go on to some of the comments with respect to page 19, it indicates at the bottom of the page some of the concerns regarding Ministers being disciplined, and the difficulty of having solidarity on cabinet. I have two different viewpoints on it. First of all, your solidarity on cabinet reflects the way the Government Leader runs cabinet. I can state without hesitation that I feel the current Government Leader has the loyalties needed and the solidarity of a cabinet team to run this government effectively, but I will not say that for the previous government. However, I want to stress that there has been a concern among Members to ensure the solidarity is followed through by cabinet Members. Cabinet Ministers must seriously consider submitting their undated letter of resignation to the Government Leader.

Motion That All Ministers Submit Undated Letters Of Resignation To Be Tabled In The House

With this comment, Mr. Chairman, I move the following motion: that all Members of cabinet submit their undated letter of resignation to the Government Leader; and further, that the Government Leader table all the letters.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 181

The Chair James Arvaluk

The motion is in order and is now being distributed. To the motion. Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 181

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. As I said earlier, it states in the report that there is insufficient focus of power within cabinet to maintain among Ministers a discipline in solidarity which is essential for the effective operation of cabinet and government in the Canadian tradition. I recognize that we have tried to be a somewhat unique government, but at the same time, in order to deliver an effective government, I feel that you need a strong team at the cabinet level. The current system does not allow for a cohesive team. With this comment, Mr. Chairman, this is the purpose of formulating and moving this motion. Thank you.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 181

The Chair James Arvaluk

To the motion. Mr. Lewis.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 181

Brian Lewis Yellowknife Centre

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. When we worked on the special committee on the northern economy we found that one of the major weaknesses we have in developing any structure or any kind of overall direction or system is in the nature of our government, where the loyalties of individual Ministers were owed to the Members that voted them in to office as an executive of this Legislature. Therefore, they are torn both ways. They are torn to loyalty to colleagues on cabinet as well as loyalties to people on this side of the House. It makes it very difficult, from time to time, for the Leader to pull the team together and get everybody rowing in the same boat.

There are a lot of other reasons why this is necessary. It was identified in Strength at Two Levels as the basic weakness in our system of government. I fully believe that the Government Leader already has powers which she knows how to use. I think all this would do is really indicate to the rest of us that there will be loyalty; that there will be a team; and that Members will respect the fact that we really cannot have any progress unless we have a government that can really show loyalty and operate together. I am sure the Leader, if she were to get these letters, would use them with the right amount of discretion at any particular time she may have to use them. Thank you.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 181

The Chair James Arvaluk

Thank you, Mr. Lewis. Mr. Nerysoo.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 181

Richard Nerysoo Mackenzie Delta

Mr. Chairman, I will speak after we have dealt with the motion.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 181

The Chair James Arvaluk

Thank you. To the motion.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 181

An Hon. Member

Question.

Motion That All Ministers Submit Undated Letters Of Resignation To Be Tabled In The House, Carried

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 181

The Chair James Arvaluk

Question is being called. All those in favour of the motion? Against? The motion is carried.

---Carried

---Applause

Thank you. Back to general comments on page 19. Mr. Todd. I am sorry, Mr. Todd, but Mr. Nerysoo will have the floor first.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 181

Richard Nerysoo Mackenzie Delta

Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you, Mr. Todd, for allowing me to speak. I just want to make a couple of comments with regard to some of the statements that were made by Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

I want to say that I support the position that she stated earlier about the idea of rationalizing Arctic College and its programs. I think there is a need to decide, not only the programs that you are considering offering, but the direction you want to take Arctic College and whether or not you are going to consider rationalizing the campuses or whether or not you are going to offer programs in the regions, and what those programs are going to be.

I want to say that despite the fact that I may have argued previously for more decentralized programs, I still believe that those decentralized programs have to be based on the capacity of our government to pay for those particular programs.

The other point I wanted to raise is that we have to have the capacity to deliver quality programs to our college students. If the idea of decentralizing programs causes a reduction in the quality of programs that we offer, then I do not think it is in our interest, and I do not think it is in the interest of the students.

There have been a number of concerns previously expressed, and I would ask our government, in particular the implementation review group, to consider what they intend to do with adult education. I do not think that we have been totally successful in the delivery of those adult programs, and I think that we should reassess where they should be delivered from. I know that the Arctic College, the board, and all those involved in that particular structure have had to deal with significant problems, not only in terms of the delivery mechanism, but financing of the programs as well. In that context we have to be certain that if we are going to run those programs and offer adult programs, they should be funded appropriately. I do not know if, under the present financial circumstances, we can afford to do that. The question I have is, if we do it, then how do we deliver those programs properly?

The other point I wanted to raise is with the health services and the facilities. I do think that before we embark on major restructuring or major downsizing, or consider downsizing of regional hospitals, we should determine whether it is really in the interest of the regions that downsizing occurs. In the long run, if you do not offer proper quality service in the regions, you are still going to have to pay for those services to be delivered. Whether or not you bring people to Yellowknife or whether or not you take them to southern institutions, you are still going to have to pay that cost. You could be taking away services that could be better offered at the regions. I just ask you to consider that.

Continuing Arguments For Better Medical Services

I also want you to be aware that the nursing stations, in many cases, are the first point of contact for medical services, and I still think that we should consider how we are going to offer services in those communities and whether or not there is a need to improve them. I know in some cases there have been continuous arguments for better medical services. I recall the arguments that were made by Mr. Kakfwi, for instance, concerning the need for a doctor in his particular region, and the former government responded to that because there was a need in that particular region. I would hope that if there was a requirement in other small areas or regions, that same thing would occur, obviously recognizing the cost of delivering that service. I would not want to impress upon our government that there is a need, but I do not want the rationalization or restructuring in any way to diminish those services.

On the matter of the motion that we just passed, there were a couple of points that I wanted to make, and I will make them now. I supported the motion, but I still do not think that is the only way in which the Government Leader can receive the loyalty of her colleagues in cabinet or those who are participating. We are going a long way, in many respects, to articulate and to define the powers of the Leader. I still do think that the most important authority that one receives is the mandate that they receive from the people. If you are talking about mandates, there is none other more important than the ability of people to give government, the Leader included, a mandate to implement certain policies. At the moment it is still in the hands of 24 Members, 24 people in the Northwest Territories, to determine the mandate in the direction of government. I think that we have to rethink that particular issue and we have to look seriously at how we continue to evolve so that the people themselves give to our government a certain mandate.

I just wanted you to be aware of the concern that I have, and I think the Government Leader knows now the feelings of people on this side. We may have some personal differences at times, but she knows that we understand and are concerned about how she can retain and maintain a certain amount of authority. We were all concerned about that, but I think that we cannot stop just at this motion. It has to go beyond this, and hopefully over the next four years we can discuss those kinds of options and those kinds of considerations. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 182

The Chair James Arvaluk

Thank you, Mr. Nerysoo. Would the government like to respond to that? If not, Mr. Todd.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 182

John Todd Keewatin Central

Sometimes when I look at Arctic College I think there has been a preoccupation with the acquisition of assets, rather than looking at the quality of education which we are delivering. This group here, on this side of the table, believes that the K to 12 has to have the priority. We have to take a fundamental look at how we are educating our kids. They are simply not coming out the system, in my opinion, with a level of education that is necessary to click in to the policies that we are trying to develop with respect to northern content, whether it is a northern hire policy or a northern buy policy.

I agree with the other speakers that Arctic College is, in my opinion, somewhat out of control. It has gone from a $10 million to $12 million budget to a $30 million budget. It is trying to be all things to all people and it simply cannot. There has to be a hard look at how this operation runs. There has to be a focus. For example, in my riding -- I have spoken on this a number of times -- I think the focus should be on trades. We are in an unfortunate situation where most of our kids do not really have the quality of education, or the level of education, I should say, that allows them to move into an academic stream. Arctic College, in my opinion, has to be given a thorough review.

I agree with the report that adult education upgrading and the adult education components are absolutely essential, certainly for the Eastern Arctic in our small communities. They are seen as a method in which younger and older people can participate in the educational process. The focus, in my opinion, should be there; and I tend to doubt that it is there.

On the "NWT Way", everybody knows my opinion on that. We will not accept reducing the level of health care in the Keewatin Region. I will, if necessary, vote against it in the coming weeks if that is the way the government wishes to go. We should be taking a different approach by finding the resources to upgrade the level of health care. We are talking about your kids and my kids. We do not have the luxuries of Yellowknife's $50 million white elephant for which we would all be paying the consequences, in my opinion, if you look at the "NWT Way." I want to make it clear to my colleagues that I have no intention of supporting the "NWT Way" model for health care delivery at this time. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 182

The Chair James Arvaluk

Thank you, Mr. Todd. Madam Government Leader, would you like to respond?

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 182

Nellie Cournoyea Nunakput

Mr. Chairman, what I would like to offer to the Member and Members -- and I have spoken to Mr. Koe about it -- is that I have a 20-minute presentation on the reference to the "NWT Way." I think the whole issue is in a broader concept. What is being referred to are specifics that come from the report. The report does not necessarily guide what is known as the NWT health care way. I just want to offer, at some point in time, that we could take about 20 minutes to do the background, because I think the general principles are going into specifics. I would like to offer this at some point in time. Thank you.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 182

The Chair James Arvaluk

Mr. Arngna'naaq.

Employment Development And Income Support Co-ordination

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 182

Silas Arngna'naaq Kivallivik

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I want to make a few comments on page 18 regarding employment development and income support co-ordination as well as the Arctic College section of the report.

In the last two paragraphs of the report it states consideration should be given to the establishment of a department of education and employment. I was under the assumption that there already is a department of this nature. I want to raise the point that I do not see where or how -- when we are talking about reducing or consolidating departments -- or why there would be a need to create another department for this matter.

I also wonder why we have advanced education as well as Arctic College. In my mind, these two areas should be one and the same. The matter of Arctic College and the way they are spending their funding makes me uncertain as to what direction they are taking at this point. I am not sure of the mandate for Arctic College, nor am I sure about the mandate for advanced education.

I would like to point out, for example, the manner in which Arctic College appears to be spending their funding. This is the Keewatin teacher education program which is being held in the Keewatin right now. From what I understand, Arctic College is planning to take the students from the Keewatin for the summer and send them to Iqaluit for a period of four to six weeks. Now, that is going to cost Arctic College the number of students there are in Keewatin times the air fare to Iqaluit from each of those communities, and they will be instructed by how many instructors I am not sure, but if it is two or three, then is it not more cost efficient to bring the instructors from Iqaluit to the Keewatin communities? I am not certain, either, of how the government funds Arctic College at this point, but I think to have this type of spending by Arctic College when we are in a time of restraint is not right. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 183

The Chair James Arvaluk

Thank you, Mr. Arngna'naaq. Are there comments from the government? If not, other general comments on page 19. Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

Motion That Arctic College Develop A Strategy To Avoid Duplication Of Services And Programs

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 183

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Mr. Chairman, in respect to the comments that have been expressed on Arctic College, I would like to move that the committee recommend that Arctic College develop a strategy that would avoid duplication of services and programs. Thank you.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 183

The Chair James Arvaluk

Thank you, Mrs. Marie-Jewell. The motion is in order. To the motion. Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 183

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Mr. Chairman, I do not feel that it is necessary to elaborate on the motion. I think there are many concerns expressed by Members that there is a duplication of services being offered at Arctic College, and in this fiscal environment that we are in, we just can no longer afford it as a Legislative Assembly, and the government should ensure that we try to get the most for our dollar. I know that the intent of the motion is to ensure that the duplication of all these courses and services be addressed, that it is too costly, and that this cannot be afforded any longer and a strategy has to be developed to address the Arctic College programs that are being delivered. Thank you.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 183

The Chair James Arvaluk

To the motion. Mr. Kakfwi.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 183

Stephen Kakfwi

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu

Mr. Chairman, I am, I guess, a little bit puzzled by the behaviour of some of the ordinary Members, in that they have been complaining all week about not feeling that they are involved in a grand plan of how to approach implementing changes or recommending changes. We have, I thought, just reached agreement that we are going to set up a working committee.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 183

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Point of order, Mr. Chairman.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 183

The Chair James Arvaluk

Point of order has been called. Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 183

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Mr. Chairman, would you ask the Minister to speak to the motion on the floor please?

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 183

The Chair James Arvaluk

Thank you, Mrs. Marie-Jewell. Will you speak to the motion?

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 183

Stephen Kakfwi

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu

Yes, I was speaking to the motion. This is my preamble. Now this particular motion is getting very specific about what I would say is not unimportant, not insignificant, but it really can be seen as a very small part of an enormous task that we are going to jointly define. We have said, and I think we have agreed, that this committee is going to look at all the jobs that need to be done to reshape northern government, and yet we have here a motion that is jumping the gun. This kind of motion would be coming, I thought, only after there is massive consideration of the entire job that has to be done, not just picking specific little areas, and I find it quite premature. Thank you.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 183

The Chair James Arvaluk

Thank you, Mr Kakfwi. To the motion.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 183

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Question.

Motion That Arctic College Develop A Strategy To Avoid Duplication Of Services And Programs, Carried

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 183

The Chair James Arvaluk

The question has been called. Those in favour of the motion? Opposed? The motion is carried.

--- Carried

Any more general comments on page 19? Mr. Koe.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 183

Fred Koe Inuvik

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I have been pretty silent during the past couple of days, going page by page, basically listening to my honourable friends, getting direction for the task they asked me to do on their behalf. At this stage, on page 19, there are a couple of subjects that are dear to my heart. One is education and one is health care and hospitals. When the Members and I as chairman of the standing committee of agencies, boards and commissions, had our first public sessions in Fort Smith, there were some very interesting scenarios in terms of what the media -- the types of questions they were asking, and the types of concerns that were being brought up by students at Arctic College in Fort Smith because of the information that was in print in the local newspaper. The issue, or what concerned me, was that people thought the ABC standing committee was just formed to make all these cuts and changes to agencies, boards and commissions because of this report. We quickly cleared that up, as to what the committee's role was.

Also, the Members that were there had a chance to mingle with the students, and they were very concerned that we came down to Fort Smith to cut Arctic College. We had a lot of discussions and talks with many of their peers. But I agree with the motion that was just passed. Arctic College has grown. In the region or riding I represent there is a campus that has been going through fairly difficult times in terms of finding operating monies and finding its mandate; why is it there and what is it supposed to be doing? Things are changing, as everything else does, and I think this motion just gives direction to the people that are in charge of Arctic College to look at their strategies and find out what programs and services should be where, and how effective and efficient they are.

In terms of health services and facilities, this is another area that the standing committee on ABCs looked at, and we heard a lot of input and feedback from people involved in the delivery of health care --doctors, nurses, regional boards from across the Territories, and other people that are interested. They were very concerned about the methods that seemingly have been used to implement this "Northwest Territories Way." I am glad the Government Leader has offered to give us an update and briefing on this, and hopefully that would help us in our deliberations and provide us with more information.

Inuvik has had a hospital for many years. It used to be a fairly large, fairly active centre with a wide range of services compared to what it is today where it has two wards, one of which is a long-term care ward with seemingly limited services. I am not one for saying it should be reduced further. At this stage, I am not willing to support any moves to do that.

I want to make these comments to clear the air on what our role is as a committee, and some of the perceptions we found when we were out visiting communities. Mahsi.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 183

The Chair James Arvaluk

Further general comments on page 19. Page 20. Mrs. Marie-Jewell.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 183

Jeannie Marie-Jewell Thebacha

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. When we look at the contents up to page 20 in Part I of this report

, I think some of the comments we have made gives government an indication of some of the concerns that Members have. In the foreword of this document, we have been able to express part of these concerns in the introduction to the review project. There is a lot more -- in excess of 200 pages -- that we have to go through.

Motion To Defer Tabled Document 9-12(2), Carried

Since the government has allowed the three Members to start a working group, I would like to move that this committee defer further consideration of Tabled Document 9-12(2), Strength at Two Levels, and that it be kept on the order paper.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 184

The Chair James Arvaluk

The motion is in order. To the motion. Ms. Cournoyea.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 184

Nellie Cournoyea Nunakput

Mr. Chairman, I do not have any objection to concluding for now; however, it is difficult being a cabinet Minister because we have a lot of similar feelings about what is happening in the communities and what services can be delivered, because we have constituents, as well. From page 21 on, we get into more detail about how the first part came to form. I was looking forward to going through the document, and perhaps we can at a later date. I want to assure you that a lot of the opinions and concerns that you have are the same concerns I have on behalf of my constituency. I know our Members here have these concerns on behalf of their constituency as well. At the same time, the matter of services to communities, health care and education are very relative no matter where we go in the Northwest Territories. Thank you.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 184

The Chair James Arvaluk

Thank you, Ms. Cournoyea. To the motion. Order, please. To the motion.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 184

An Hon. Member

Question.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 184

The Chair James Arvaluk

Question has been called. All those in favour of the motion? Those opposed? The motion is carried.

---Carried

The motion for deferral of Tabled Document 9-12(2), Strength at Two Levels, has been carried. What is the wish of the committee? I cannot add too much here unless I hear from Members. Mr. Zoe.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 184

Henry Zoe

Henry Zoe North Slave

Mr. Chairman, I wonder if we can go to Bill 14, in conjunction with the tabled document from the standing committee on finance.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 184

The Chair James Arvaluk

There has been a request to go to Bill 14 and Committee Report 3-12(2). Does the committee agree? Mr. Nerysoo.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 184

Richard Nerysoo Mackenzie Delta

Mr. Chairman, I move that we report progress.

Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 18: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 184

The Chair James Arvaluk

The motion is in order. It is not debatable. Those in favour of the motion? All those opposed? The motion is carried.

---Carried

I will now rise and report progress.

Item 19: Report Of Committee Of The Whole
Item 19: Report Of Committee Of The Whole

Page 184

The Speaker

Item 19, report of committee of the whole. Mr. Chairman.

Item 19: Report Of Committee Of The Whole
Item 19: Report Of Committee Of The Whole

Page 184

James Arvaluk Aivilik

Mr. Speaker, your committee has been considering Tabled Document 9-12(2) and wishes to report progress, with two motions being adopted. Mr. Speaker, I move that the report of the chairman of committee of the whole be concurred with.

Item 19: Report Of Committee Of The Whole
Item 19: Report Of Committee Of The Whole

Page 184

The Speaker

Seconder to the motion? Mr. Nerysoo. Your motion is in order. All those in favour? All those opposed? The motion is carried.

---Carried

Item 20, third reading of bills. Item 21, orders of the day. Mr. Clerk.

Item 19: Report Of Committee Of The Whole
Item 19: Report Of Committee Of The Whole

Page 184

Clerk Of The House Mr. David Hamilton

There will be a meeting of the ordinary Members' caucus at 9:00 a.m. tomorrow morning.

Item 21: Orders Of The Day
Item 21: Orders Of The Day

Page 184

Clerk Of The House Mr. David Hamilton

Orders of the day for Friday, February 28, 1992.

1. Prayer

2. Ministers' Statements

3. Members' Statements

4. Returns to Oral Questions

5. Oral Questions

6. Written Questions

7. Returns to Written Questions

8. Replies to Opening Address

9. Petitions

10. Reports of Standing and Special Committees

11. Reports of Committees on the Review of Bills

12. Tabling of Documents

13. Notices of Motions

14. Notices of Motions for First Reading of Bills

15. Motions

16. First Reading of Bills

17. Second Reading of Bills

18. Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters: Tabled Documents 9-12(2), 10-12(2) and 12-12(2); Bill 14; Committee Report 3-12(2)

19. Report of Committee of the Whole

20. Third Reading of Bills

21. Orders of the Day

Item 21: Orders Of The Day
Item 21: Orders Of The Day

Page 184

The Speaker

Thank you, Mr. Clerk. This House stands adjourned until 10:00 a.m., Friday, February 28, 1992.

---ADJOURNMENT