Mr. Chairman, to the motion, I do not have a particular problem with the region being specifically identified. I think the intent of this motion is to, at least, have a study undertaken by the department so that once they complete the study of this particular region and if the numbers are high, and if it is alarmingly high, then perhaps it would warrant the department to study other regions to look at the problem on a larger scale. I think this was the intent of the motion, to have a starting point. However, if Members feel that by naming a specific region implies that this region has a large alcohol
problem, I do not think this was the case when the special committee put forward this particular motion. I think they wanted to tell the department, because of the concerns which were raised through their hearings, that this type of clinical study should be undertaken. I do not have a big problem with the current motion that we have in front of us, but if Members wish to make it more general instead of being specific to a region, then I do not have a problem with that either. If we make it just a general statement, then the onus would be on the department to select which region they would like to undertake this study on. I think after hearing from the Deh Cho region, the committee felt that perhaps that region should be looked at. I have no problems either way. If someone wants to make an amendment or if we leave it as is, I would support this motion.