This is page numbers 231 - 261 of the Hansard for the 13th Assembly, 3rd Session. The original version can be accessed on the Legislative Assembly's website or by contacting the Legislative Assembly Library. The word of the day was chairman.

Topics

Supplementary To Question 170-13(3): GNWT Support For Nunavut Decentralized Government
Question 170-13(3):gnwt Support For Nunavut Decentralized Government
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 241

Kevin O'Brien Kivallivik

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Given the serious concern regarding this issue, when can we expect the information regarding the Minister's opinion? Thank you.

Supplementary To Question 170-13(3): GNWT Support For Nunavut Decentralized Government
Question 170-13(3):gnwt Support For Nunavut Decentralized Government
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 241

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Mr. Todd.

Further Return To Question 170-13(3): GNWT Support For Nunavut Decentralized Government
Question 170-13(3):gnwt Support For Nunavut Decentralized Government
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 241

John Todd Keewatin Central

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. There are two issues and I tried to address that yesterday or the day before. One is the transitional incremental costs associated with Nunavut; that is the money that is required over and above the current gross expenditure base that we have within this government; and that is the $150 million or $117 million, depending on how you want to define it. We are currently working that through, as I said to my colleague earlier. What is of equal importance and one that we have almost addressed is the process in which we are going to determine an appropriate plan of action as it relates to determining two gross expenditure bases for the operations and maintenance costs of the new governments. So they work in harmony with each other. I am hoping that over this weekend, I will get some direction and support on some of these hard and difficult questions from the Minister and some support from our colleagues and a process in which to work these important, long-term financial needs out. Thank you.

Further Return To Question 170-13(3): GNWT Support For Nunavut Decentralized Government
Question 170-13(3):gnwt Support For Nunavut Decentralized Government
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 241

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Item 6, oral questions. Mr. Enuaraq.

Question 171-13(3): GNWT Position Regarding Article 24 Of Nfa
Item 6: Oral Questions

May 6th, 1996

Page 241

Tommy Enuaraq Baffin Central

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I was pleased to learn today the progress which has been made by our government to respond to article 24 of the Nunavut final agreement. My question is to the Minister of Public Works and Services. When will this new policy come into effect?

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

The Minister of Public Works and Services, Mr. Arlooktoo.

Return To Question 171-13(3): GNWT Position Regarding Article 24 Of Nfa
Question 171-13(3): GNWT Position Regarding Article 24 Of Nfa
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 241

Goo Arlooktoo Baffin South

Mr. Speaker, the policy comes into effect immediately. Implementation will happen as practical. The section on negotiated contracts will be implemented immediately and next week, the first advertisements for the particular negotiated contract I mentioned will happen. Interim measures for minimal levels of Inuit participation will be implemented immediately for this summer with the formal policy being established by September.

Return To Question 171-13(3): GNWT Position Regarding Article 24 Of Nfa
Question 171-13(3): GNWT Position Regarding Article 24 Of Nfa
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 241

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Supplementary, Mr. Enuaraq.

Supplementary To Question 171-13(3): GNWT Position Regarding Article 24 Of Nfa
Question 171-13(3): GNWT Position Regarding Article 24 Of Nfa
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 241

Tommy Enuaraq Baffin Central

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Could the Minister tell this House what the real benefits are for Inuit that the GNWT expects to achieve through this policy on article 24?

Supplementary To Question 171-13(3): GNWT Position Regarding Article 24 Of Nfa
Question 171-13(3): GNWT Position Regarding Article 24 Of Nfa
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 241

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Mr. Arlooktoo.

Further Return To Question 171-13(3): GNWT Position Regarding Article 24 Of Nfa
Question 171-13(3): GNWT Position Regarding Article 24 Of Nfa
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 241

Goo Arlooktoo Baffin South

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. As I said earlier, the basic goals are for increased participation of Inuit in business opportunities in the Nunavut region. We want to improve the capacity of Inuit firms to be able to bid for and let government contracts and to increase the employment of Inuit beneficiaries in Nunavut at a representative level. So in short, those are the benefits that we want to see.

Further Return To Question 171-13(3): GNWT Position Regarding Article 24 Of Nfa
Question 171-13(3): GNWT Position Regarding Article 24 Of Nfa
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 242

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Thank you. I would like to recognize a member from the community of Enterprise, Mr. Karl Mueller. Welcome to the Assembly.

--- Applause

Item 6, oral questions. Mr. Rabesca.

James Rabesca North Slave

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is for the Premier or for the Minister of Transportation. On May 2, 1996, the mayor of Rae-Edzo and Grand Chief Joe Rabesca wrote a letter to you concerning a tender call made by the Department of Transportation, which was by invitation only for quality assurance work and Highway #3 on kilometre 165 to 175. As you may be aware, Rae-Edzo does have an active engineering company that is locally owned and operated for that active Dogrib ownership. This company strives to train local people in various aspects of the engineering field. However, due to a reluctance of the Department of Transportation in recognizing this company, they cannot get work in order to train our local people. It is imperative that our people receive training and education in the field of engineering.

Today I spoke to the owners of this company and their main concern is to be able to bid on various contracts that become available. There is no reason why they cannot. My question is, why has the Department of Transportation felt it was necessary not to include this company in the bidding process for this particular job, considering the high component of training that would take place. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

The Minister of Transportation, Mr. Antoine.

Return To Question 172-1313): Exclusion Of North Slave Company From Dot Tender Call
Question 172-13(3): Exclusion Of North Slave Company From Dot Tender Call
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 242

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Mahsi, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, the company the honourable Member is referring to is ABT Engineering. It is a new engineering consulting company. There are about 10 engineering consulting companies in and around Yellowknife that the department uses. This particular concern is with regard to a proposal that was put out by the Department of Transportation for quality assurance on Highway #3, which is kilometre 165 to 175. That is the section between the communities of Fort Providence and Rae-Edzo.

According to the department, the government has a policy which they use for utilizing architectural and engineering consultants. It is called the selection of architectural and engineering services policy, which is a directive of the BIP. This is what the departnment follows. Of the 10 firms, according to this policy, three firms are asked at a time. In a previous contract, ABT Engineering was included as one of the three for an adjacent piece of work. Unfortuantely, BT was not successful. Other people had better proposals, so they weren't selected. This time around, another three firms were invited to put a bid in. This is how the department does its work in acquiring services of engineering consultants. It isn't the intention of the department to be reluctant in accepting an engineering firm. It is just the way the department has been doing business. Thank you.

Return To Question 172-1313): Exclusion Of North Slave Company From Dot Tender Call
Question 172-13(3): Exclusion Of North Slave Company From Dot Tender Call
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 242

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Thank you. Supplementary, Mr. Rabesca.

Supplementary To Question 172-13(3): Exclusion Of North Slave Company From Dot Tender Call
Question 172-13(3): Exclusion Of North Slave Company From Dot Tender Call
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 242

James Rabesca North Slave

Mr. Speaker, I think it is disappointing that you are only representing half of the people in the constituency. The closing date for the tenders is scheduled for some time this afternoon. I was hoping to ask the Minister whether he would be able to delay opening the tenders, so we will be able to have the company in question submit their bid, along with the three that you have selected so far.

I would further like to say northern preference should be included and the business incentive policy and the affirmative action policy should be practised to their fullest extent. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Supplementary To Question 172-13(3): Exclusion Of North Slave Company From Dot Tender Call
Question 172-13(3): Exclusion Of North Slave Company From Dot Tender Call
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 242

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Thank you. Mr. Antoine.

Further Return To Question 172-13(3): Exclusion Of North Slave Company From Dot Tender Call
Question 172-13(3): Exclusion Of North Slave Company From Dot Tender Call
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 242

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I understand the concern of the honourable Member. Unfortunately, this concern came to my attention right around noon and the letter was written last Thursday from the leaders of the community to try to intervene. The proposal closes in five minutes. I am going to have to respond to the honourable Member in his request that I delay the tender schedule. I will not do that. I will let the tender go ahead. It is a proposal call. The bid is not public. There are three companies involved and they have done this according to the rules. I would like to keep that in place.

Like I said, there is the selection of architectural and engineering services policy that the department is following. I understand that ABT Engineering is aware of this policy. It is the practice of the Department of Transportation to follow this policy. Thank you.

Further Return To Question 172-13(3): Exclusion Of North Slave Company From Dot Tender Call
Question 172-13(3): Exclusion Of North Slave Company From Dot Tender Call
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 242

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Thank you. Supplementary, Mr. Rabesca.

Supplementary To Question 172-13(3): Exclusion Of North Slave Company From Dot Tender Call
Question 172-13(3): Exclusion Of North Slave Company From Dot Tender Call
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 242

James Rabesca North Slave

Mr. Speaker, like I said earlier on, I would like to say that I wouldn't like to see this type of response coming from the Minister to happen in the future. If the practice of northern preference or the business incentive policy is not being followed by the Minister, I wonder if he would be able to consider retendering the contract so that any company that operates within the Territories will not have to go through the same practice that we have experienced this afternoon. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Supplementary To Question 172-13(3): Exclusion Of North Slave Company From Dot Tender Call
Question 172-13(3): Exclusion Of North Slave Company From Dot Tender Call
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 242

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

That was your final supplementary, Mr. Rabesca. Mr. Antoine.

Further Return To Question 172-13(3): Exclusion Of North Slave Company From Dot Tender Call
Question 172-13(3): Exclusion Of North Slave Company From Dot Tender Call
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 243

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Like I said earlier, this issue came to my attention just about an hour before session started. So there is very little time to sit down with anyone who is involved in this company. Normally, if a company like that is concerned, they could contact me and we will discuss it at a time when we aren't under time pressure. There are other contracts that will be let out in that area. The honourable Member is requesting that this particular firm out of Rae-Edzo get preferential treatment in that area. You are going to have to consider that with the fact that there are another 10 firms out there. Depending on the composition, we are going to have to discuss this further in light of your request. It is a serious concern for the Member and for myself. Unfortunately, we can't really deal with it at this point. I would suggest that we get together with the people he represents, the department and look at this concern and see if we can resolve it for future work that may be coming up. Thank you.

Further Return To Question 172-13(3): Exclusion Of North Slave Company From Dot Tender Call
Question 172-13(3): Exclusion Of North Slave Company From Dot Tender Call
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 243

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Item 6, oral questions. Mr. Krutko.

David Krutko

David Krutko Mackenzie Delta

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I raised a question May 1st with regard to funding to the tourism training program with the Premier. At this time, I would like to ask the question to the Minister of Economic Development and Tourism. My question is regarding the possible cuts in the area of training.

The NWT Tourism Training Group has been in place for four years. It was established by the NWT Tourism Association. As you know, there is now a new establishment of tour operators which consists of an eastern tourism group and also a western tourism group. With tourism being one of the fastest-growing industries in the world and if we want to compete with other tour operators, we have to have trained and qualified individuals. Right now, the only arm for the tourism association is the NWT Tourism Training Group.

In 1995, the NWT Tourism Training Group submitted a proposal to the Department of Economic Development and Tourism for $285,000 to administer and operate programs in the Northwest Territories, which includes the East and the West. In April 1996, they received a response back to their proposal, in which they were allocated $175,000, which was broken down based on percentages; 40 per cent of those dollars will go to the eastern tourism association and 60 per cent to the West. Those resources which have been allocated, the group may have to close its doors and not be able to operate in this next fiscal year. At the present time, it does have contract obligations to Arctic College to deliver programs for next year based on the $285,000 figure. My question is, will he reconsider the offer and sit down with this group to resolve this, so that both groups can continue to operate in the future. Thank you.