This is page numbers 371 - 400 of the Hansard for the 13th Assembly, 4th Session. The original version can be accessed on the Legislative Assembly's website or by contacting the Legislative Assembly Library. The word of the day was federal.

Topics

Further Return To Question 221-13(4): Sale Of Dew Line Sites
Question 221-13(4): Sale Of Dew Line Sites
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 381

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Thank you. Oral questions. Final supplementary, Mr. Picco.

Supplementary To Question 221-13(4): Sale Of Dew Line Sites
Question 221-13(4): Sale Of Dew Line Sites
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 381

Edward Picco Iqaluit

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I know that the Minister will be following this very closely. Will the Minister commit to this House, and the people of the Northwest Territories, that as this situation develops, he will address it here in the House, so that the people of the Northwest Territories can be updated on what is happening with the sale, and the possible burying or not burying of these contaminated DEW Line sites. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Further Return To Question 221-13(4): Sale Of Dew Line Sites
Question 221-13(4): Sale Of Dew Line Sites
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 381

Stephen Kakfwi

Stephen Kakfwi Sahtu

Mr. Speaker, yes, I will do what I can to keep the Members informed. I thank the Member for raising it and providing an opportunity for myself to respond to him in this forum. As well, I would expect that the Reform Party, and the Bloc Quebecois in their usual high standard of being the official opposition, vying for that position, will be asking their usual precise questions, protecting the interests of the public in issues like this. Thank you.

Further Return To Question 221-13(4): Sale Of Dew Line Sites
Question 221-13(4): Sale Of Dew Line Sites
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 381

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Thank you. Oral questions. Mrs. Groenewegen.

Question 222-13(4): Benefits Owing To Seniors
Item 6: Oral Questions

February 3rd, 1997

Page 381

Groenewegen

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, my question today is for the Minister of Education, Culture, and Employment. This government provides a monthly supplementary benefit to seniors in need in the amount of $135 per month. I understand that a number of seniors in my riding still have not received their cheques, which normally they would get by the end of January. Can the Minister please tell me why these cheques have not been issued as of yet? Thank you.

Question 222-13(4): Benefits Owing To Seniors
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 381

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

The Minister of Education, Culture, and Employment. Mr. Dent.

Return To Question 222-13(4): Benefits Owing To Seniors
Question 222-13(4): Benefits Owing To Seniors
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 381

Charles Dent

Charles Dent Yellowknife Frame Lake

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, the amount that the Member refers to is paid to low income seniors each month and is tied directly to the Federal

Old Age Security Benefit. Apparently, difficulties occurred when the Old Age Security office in Edmonton tried to input the new postal codes for Hay River. The computer rejected the new postal codes and as a result dropped 65 seniors off the mailing list.

Return To Question 222-13(4): Benefits Owing To Seniors
Question 222-13(4): Benefits Owing To Seniors
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 382

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Thank you. Oral questions. Mrs. Groenewegen.

Supplementary To Question 222-13(4): Benefits Owing To Seniors
Question 222-13(4): Benefits Owing To Seniors
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 382

Groenewegen

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. This is unfortunate that this has taken place, but I do appreciate the Minister's explanation. I would hope that seniors in Hay River would be understanding, Mr. Speaker. This $135 per month payment is very important to many senior citizens who do not earn high income and have recently experienced reductions in support. Can the Minister tell me when the seniors in Hay River will be getting their cheques exactly? Thank you.

Supplementary To Question 222-13(4): Benefits Owing To Seniors
Question 222-13(4): Benefits Owing To Seniors
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 382

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Mr. Dent.

Further Return To Question 222-13(4): Benefits Owing To Seniors
Question 222-13(4): Benefits Owing To Seniors
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 382

Charles Dent

Charles Dent Yellowknife Frame Lake

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I am advised that the cheques will be printed tomorrow and will be couriered to Hay River, and will be available in Hay River on Thursday. The Post Mistress has been contacted and has agreed to treat the cheques as priority items, so that seniors will be able to pick them up on Thursday at the post office. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Further Return To Question 222-13(4): Benefits Owing To Seniors
Question 222-13(4): Benefits Owing To Seniors
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 382

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Thank you. Oral questions. Mr. Steen.

Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 382

Vince Steen

Vince Steen Nunakput

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, my question is addressed to Mr. Antoine, Minister of Aboriginal Affairs. Mr. Speaker, we have a board out in a part of the building here in the main lobby, identifying the amount of days left until we arrive at April 1, 1999. I wonder, Mr. Speaker, if the Minister could indicate to the House what the timeframe is for this House to have a constitution ready, to present to the federal government, what that deadline date is?

Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 382

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

The Minister of Aboriginal Affairs. Mr. Antoine.

Return To Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 382

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, to develop a constitution for the west in the NWT here, we still have a long way to go. We are only now looking at going into the communities. We finally secured some funding from this government and the feds to put teams together and go into the communities and explain the package, and get some feedback. Hopefully, have a revision of the package by the spring, perhaps this summer. The idea here is to have the package for ratification in the fall sometime.

In the meantime, the Constitutional Working Group has been working with the federal officials, because we need them to be involved if ever we are to put changes to the NWT Act into the federal legislation. They have to be involved from the very beginning. They are involved now, and they are willing to participate as we look at revising the package. That it will be acceptable first to people in the North and it has to also be acceptable to the federal government before they agreed to go ahead and develop the legislation that will go through their Parliament.

As we all know, the federal government is going to be going into a federal election fairly soon. Maybe, as early as this spring, maybe in the fall we are told. We have to take that into consideration. If we say that there is a federal election by the fall, let us say October, I am not saying that is going to happen, I am just saying that it could happen. If we have documentation, that will have to be ready by then, and then once a new government gets in, we will be able to hopefully work with the new government that is in place to move ahead with legislation.

It is going to be sometime before, it will take about a year or so before we get through that process. We do not know. I have to tell the honourable Member that at this point and time, although we have discussed it quite thoroughly, it is still very much an unknown at this point in time. But we can only speculate that we look at some timeframes and we try to aim for that. Hopefully, we will have something in place by the time division happens. That window of opportunity is very narrow, and it is closing very rapidly. There are so many different players involved that it is going to be very hard to say right now that we are going to have a legislation ready to go for acceptance by division time. Thank you.

Return To Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 382

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Thank you. Oral questions. Supplementary, Mr. Steen.

Supplementary To Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 382

Vince Steen

Vince Steen Nunakput

Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and I thank the Minister for that long response. But what I wanted to know, Mr. Speaker was, what is the deadline we have to achieve in order to ensure that the federal government has time to process the legislation in the House of Commons? In other words, if we put forward a new NWT constitution, what is the timeframe required by the federal government in order to process that piece of legislation, so it is in effect? That was the question I had.

Supplementary To Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 382

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Mr. Antoine.

Further Return To Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 382

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, we do not have a timeframe. I do not know. It is a real unknown at this time. I am told by the people who are

aware of these things that it usually takes a minimum of two years for a legislation to go through the federal Parliament. Like I said, earlier, we do not have a legislation yet. We are still developing a package which will eventually become legislation in the federal government. DIAND will probably be one of the key players in the federal system to develop a package. So at this point of time, it is a unknown to us. We can only go by what we are told by people who are experts in these things, and they are telling us that it takes about two years before legislation goes through the federal system. Thank you.

Further Return To Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 383

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Oral questions. Supplementary, Mr. Steen.

Supplementary To Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 383

Vince Steen

Vince Steen Nunakput

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I believe last summer over the course of the summer in some of the meetings we had with Aboriginal Affairs Department, we were advised that it takes roughly 17 to 22 months for the government to process legislation. In other words, DIAND would have to introduce the legislation at a certain timeframe. It would have to go through the House of Commons, Senate, the whole process, in order to be an Act. Therefore, what I am trying to find out, if we want a new constitution by 1999, have we already passed the timeframe that would allow us to properly hand this in, so the federal government can do this?

Supplementary To Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 383

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Mr. Antoine.

Further Return To Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 383

Jim Antoine Nahendeh

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, I only could tell the honourable Member what may possibly happen. It is unknown at this point in time, but if the feds agree to speed up this legislation, then I think they have the capability of doing that. But, if it is going to go through a normal process, I am told that the honourable Member is correct. It would be about 22 months, which is two years, for legislation to go through. If you factor in the federal election that may be coming, perhaps we have already gone past the time before we are able to have a package by 1999. It might be 1999 that we have a package. So I could only speculate at this time, Mr. Speaker. Thank you.

Further Return To Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 383

The Speaker Samuel Gargan

Thank you. Oral questions. Final supplementary, Mr. Steen.

Supplementary To Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Question 223-13(4): Timeframe For A Western Constitution
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 383

Vince Steen

Vince Steen Nunakput

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, my question to the Minster is, is there any point in holding on to these community tours and we are going to have a suggestion here of a revised constitution by fall, and I presume more community tours. Is there any point in all this if we do not have time to introduce the legislation before 1999? Thank you.