This is page numbers 297 - 330 of the Hansard for the 14th Assembly, 6th Session. The original version can be accessed on the Legislative Assembly's website or by contacting the Legislative Assembly Library. The word of the day was know.

Topics

Return To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 310

Jake Ootes Yellowknife Centre

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, one of the thrusts of the harmonization program was to ensure that the criteria for accessing government programs is consistent, so we harmonized the program with the income support programs. There will be some consideration taken for income that individuals have at the present time that will be counted in their total income. There will be a level of income judged to dictate how much rent they pay. We did ensure that the amount of rent individuals pay will be a maximum of $200 a month, Mr. Speaker. They will be so-called grandfathered. New individuals will be based on their particular income assessments. I don't have the figures available though, Mr. Speaker, in terms of the number of people that would be affected by that. They may be able to check that out with the Housing Corporation. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Return To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 310

The Deputy Speaker David Krutko

Supplementary, Mrs. Groenewegen.

Supplementary To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 310

Jane Groenewegen Hay River South

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, does the Minister think it's fair that a single mother with four children who has been living in public housing and working for the private sector at fairly minimal wages would now be negatively impacted by this harmonization because she would see her rent go up significantly because of the support payments that she would receive from her former spouse that is intended to help pay for things like education, clothing, incidental costs for children. Does the Minister think that that's fair? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Supplementary To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 310

The Deputy Speaker David Krutko

Minister of Education, Culture and Employment, Mr. Ootes.

Further Return To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 310

Jake Ootes Yellowknife Centre

Mr. Speaker, when we did the harmonization project, we wanted to ensure that there was a balance between the two income support programs and the Housing Corporation, the way the income is tested. It's income tested, so the individuals are at a certain level of income before an increase is applied, Mr. Speaker. That we checked with the standing committees before we introduced the programs and we do feel that we can move forward on this. A lot of people are going to be beneficiaries of this new particular program. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Further Return To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 310

The Deputy Speaker David Krutko

Supplementary, Mrs. Groenewegen.

Supplementary To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 310

Jane Groenewegen Hay River South

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, in 1997, there was a fairly significant federal court ruling as a result of a woman who challenged Revenue Canada's position on treating maintenance support as taxable income. How does the Minister of Education, Culture and Employment reconcile this government's treatment of this as taxable income or accountable income in terms of this government's programs, when it was proven that the federal government could not charge taxes on that portion of money that was received by the custodial parent? How do you reconcile those differences? Thank you.

Supplementary To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 311

The Deputy Speaker David Krutko

Minister of Education, Culture and Employment, Mr. Ootes.

Further Return To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 311

Jake Ootes Yellowknife Centre

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would have to take a look at the reference the honourable Member is making to that particular ruling. I am not familiar with it, Mr. Speaker, but I could see what that ruling said. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Further Return To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 311

The Deputy Speaker David Krutko

Final supplementary, Mrs. Groenewegen.

Supplementary To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 311

Jane Groenewegen Hay River South

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, if the intent of that ruling by the federal courts holds similarity in terms of how income of custodial parents taking care of children is treated, would the Minister consider modifying the harmonization initiative before it's implemented and take into consideration those parents that would be negatively impacted by the way the initiative is proceeding now. Thank you.

Supplementary To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 311

The Deputy Speaker David Krutko

Minister of Education, Culture and Employment, Mr. Ootes.

Further Return To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 311

Jake Ootes Yellowknife Centre

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I can't make a commitment here, Mr. Speaker, without looking at the details of that particular court decision. I am not familiar with it and it wasn't brought to my attention previously, Mr. Speaker. So we would have to look at seeing what the implications of that court decision were and whether it would even apply to us. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Further Return To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions

Page 311

The Deputy Speaker David Krutko

Item 6, oral questions. Member for Hay River North, Mr. Delorey.

Question 90-14(6): Placement Of New Physicians
Item 6: Oral Questions

February 25th, 2003

Page 311

Paul Delorey Hay River North

Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is for the Minister of Heath and Social Services. Mr. Speaker, yesterday in the House, I asked the Minister for a complete breakdown of exactly what communities the 10 new general practitioners will be serving. The following was his response: "There are three additional specialists going to Yellowknife. There are two for the Sahtu, two for the Dogrib, one for the Deh Cho and the remainder we are devoting to Yellowknife." I am kind of confused with this answer. I am aware that the 10 new doctors are general practitioners, not specialists, as indicated by the Minister's response yesterday. I am wondering if the Minister could clarify whether the three specialists that he mentioned yesterday are indeed part of the 10 general practitioners that he talked about. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.