Debates of Feb. 25th, 2003
This is page numbers 297 - 330 of the Hansard for the 14th Assembly, 6th Session. The original version can be accessed on the Legislative Assembly's website or by contacting the Legislative Assembly Library. The word of the day was know.
Topics
- Members Present
- Item 1: Prayer
- Minister's Statement 22-14(6): Taking Action On Tobacco
- 2003 Northern Games
- Investing In Northern People, Communities And Small Businesses
- Capitalizing On Employment Opportunities Through Educational Achievement
- Recognition Of Alf Mansell Award Winner Lloyd Brunes
- North Slave Housing Development
- Draft Disability Framework And Action Plan
- 2003 Young Women's "power Up" Conference
- Emerging Cultural Tourism Sector
- Comprehensive Smoking Cessation Program Required
- Question 79-14(6): Persons With Disabilities Program Funding
- Question 80-14(6): GNWT Sport And Recreation Policy
- Question 81-14(6): Tobacco Use As A Public Safety Issue
- Question 82-14(6): Northern Development Preparedness Funding
- Question 83-14(6): Anti-smoking Programs
- Question 84-14(6): Advancing Trades In NWT Schools
- Question 85-14(6): Evaluation Of "quit And Win" Program
- Question 86-14(6): Local Housing Project Delivery In The North Slave
- Question 87-14(6): Accessing Development Opportunities Through Employment Readiness
- Question 88-14(6): Federal Transportation Blueprint
- Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
- Question 90-14(6): Placement Of New Physicians
- Return To Written Question 1-14(6): GNWT Policy On Employee E-mail And Internet Usage
- Tabled Document 23-14(6): Letter And Newsletter Of The Native Women's Association Of The Nwt
- Motion 3-14(6): Extension Of The Mandate Of The Special Joint Committee On Non-tax-based Community Affairs, Carried
- Item 20: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
- Bill 3: Appropriation Act, 2003-2004
- General Comments
- Item 20: Report Of Committee Of The Whole
- Item 20: Orders Of The Day
Return To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 310

Jake Ootes Yellowknife Centre
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, one of the thrusts of the harmonization program was to ensure that the criteria for accessing government programs is consistent, so we harmonized the program with the income support programs. There will be some consideration taken for income that individuals have at the present time that will be counted in their total income. There will be a level of income judged to dictate how much rent they pay. We did ensure that the amount of rent individuals pay will be a maximum of $200 a month, Mr. Speaker. They will be so-called grandfathered. New individuals will be based on their particular income assessments. I don't have the figures available though, Mr. Speaker, in terms of the number of people that would be affected by that. They may be able to check that out with the Housing Corporation. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Return To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 310
Supplementary To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 310

Jane Groenewegen Hay River South
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, does the Minister think it's fair that a single mother with four children who has been living in public housing and working for the private sector at fairly minimal wages would now be negatively impacted by this harmonization because she would see her rent go up significantly because of the support payments that she would receive from her former spouse that is intended to help pay for things like education, clothing, incidental costs for children. Does the Minister think that that's fair? Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Supplementary To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 310
Further Return To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 310

Jake Ootes Yellowknife Centre
Mr. Speaker, when we did the harmonization project, we wanted to ensure that there was a balance between the two income support programs and the Housing Corporation, the way the income is tested. It's income tested, so the individuals are at a certain level of income before an increase is applied, Mr. Speaker. That we checked with the standing committees before we introduced the programs and we do feel that we can move forward on this. A lot of people are going to be beneficiaries of this new particular program. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Further Return To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 310
Supplementary To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 310

Jane Groenewegen Hay River South
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, in 1997, there was a fairly significant federal court ruling as a result of a woman who challenged Revenue Canada's position on treating maintenance support as taxable income. How does the Minister of Education, Culture and Employment reconcile this government's treatment of this as taxable income or accountable income in terms of this government's programs, when it was proven that the federal government could not charge taxes on that portion of money that was received by the custodial parent? How do you reconcile those differences? Thank you.
Supplementary To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 311
Further Return To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 311

Jake Ootes Yellowknife Centre
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I would have to take a look at the reference the honourable Member is making to that particular ruling. I am not familiar with it, Mr. Speaker, but I could see what that ruling said. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Further Return To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 311
Supplementary To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 311

Jane Groenewegen Hay River South
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, if the intent of that ruling by the federal courts holds similarity in terms of how income of custodial parents taking care of children is treated, would the Minister consider modifying the harmonization initiative before it's implemented and take into consideration those parents that would be negatively impacted by the way the initiative is proceeding now. Thank you.
Supplementary To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 311
Further Return To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 311

Jake Ootes Yellowknife Centre
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I can't make a commitment here, Mr. Speaker, without looking at the details of that particular court decision. I am not familiar with it and it wasn't brought to my attention previously, Mr. Speaker. So we would have to look at seeing what the implications of that court decision were and whether it would even apply to us. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Further Return To Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Question 89-14(6): Harmonization Of Income Support And Social Housing
Item 6: Oral Questions
Page 311
Question 90-14(6): Placement Of New Physicians
Item 6: Oral Questions
February 25th, 2003
Page 311

Paul Delorey Hay River North
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. My question is for the Minister of Heath and Social Services. Mr. Speaker, yesterday in the House, I asked the Minister for a complete breakdown of exactly what communities the 10 new general practitioners will be serving. The following was his response: "There are three additional specialists going to Yellowknife. There are two for the Sahtu, two for the Dogrib, one for the Deh Cho and the remainder we are devoting to Yellowknife." I am kind of confused with this answer. I am aware that the 10 new doctors are general practitioners, not specialists, as indicated by the Minister's response yesterday. I am wondering if the Minister could clarify whether the three specialists that he mentioned yesterday are indeed part of the 10 general practitioners that he talked about. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Help us improve OpenNWT
Please only include contact information if you would like to hear back.