Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The Electoral Boundaries Commission. The creation of Nunavut on April 1, 1999 had a significant impact on the population balance among the electoral districts remaining in the western Northwest Territories. Since early in the life of the 13th Legislative Assembly, Members of the then Western Caucus had been considering the appropriate number and distribution of seats for the new western territory. On October 18, 1996, the Legislative Assembly enacted the Electoral Boundaries Commissions Act, which permitted the establishment of an Electoral Boundaries Commission for Nunavut and one for the new Northwest Territories, if the Assembly so chose.
In January, 1998, Western Caucus indicated that the majority of western MLAs agreed with members of the Aboriginal Summit that the 14th Legislative Assembly general election should be based on the existing 14 western seats, given that negotiations for the development of a new constitutional structure for the new NWT had not been finalized.
However, MLAs also recognized that the 14 electoral boundaries remaining in the west after the creation of Nunavut could be subject to challenge under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, because of the uneven distribution of population among the ridings. In light of this, the Legislative Assembly decided to form a NWT Electoral Boundaries Commission. The Commission was established on June 1, 1998.
The NWT Electoral Boundaries Commission was composed of NWT Supreme Court Justice Virginia Schuler as chair, Ms. Lucy Kuptana of Tutktoyaktuk and Mr. Nick Sibbeston of Fort Simpson. The commission conducted a review of the western electoral boundaries through a community consultation process in August and September of 1998.
Under the Electoral Boundaries Commissions Act, the commission's task was to review the area, boundaries, name and representation of the existing electoral districts and make recommendations for new electoral districts. Section 11 of the Act required the commission to take into consideration factors including:
I.geographic and demographic considerations, including the sparsity, density or rate of growth of the population of any part of the Territory and the accessibility, size or shape of any part of the Territory;
As well, the Legislative Assembly directed the commission to strive to maintain a balance between urban and rural populations, and to take into consideration the cultural and linguistic interests of the Territories and the present land claim boundaries.
On October 23, 1998, the commission submitted its report to the Legislature. The commission recommended that two seats be added in Yellowknife, bringing the total number of seats in the Legislative Assembly to 16. The commission explained that it was recommending minimal changes at this time. The Legislative Assembly is still undergoing change, the political landscape of the western Territory is changing, and the commission felt that the uncertainty was a good reason to be cautious.
The commission noted, at page 12: We feel that if significant changes are to be considered, they should wait until the current processes have resulted in a constitutional framework and structure of government which can be expected to last for some time. We recognize and indeed we recommend that a further boundaries commission should be established when that government is in place. That commission will be able to assess the situation as it exists at that time B a more realistic and useful exercise than trying to anticipate now what that situation will be.
The commission's report was debated in the Legislative Assembly. A motion based on the recommendation for two additional seats for Yellowknife was defeated, as was a subsequent motion for one additional seat for Yellowknife. As a result, the composition of the Legislative Assembly remained at 14 seats.
NWT Supreme Court Decision. On November 25, 1998, a group of Yellowknife residents called "The Friends of Democracy" filed a notice of motion in the NWT Supreme Court. The group sought an order declaring the provisions of the Legislative Assembly and Executive Council Act that establish the 14 seats in the Northwest Territories to be unconstitutional and of no force and effect, because they violate the protection of the right to vote under section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Both the GNWT and the intervenors argued that nothing should be done to affect the status quo in the distribution of seats at this critical stage in NWT constitutional development. The intervenors submitted that the current number of seats should not be changed until aboriginal land claims and self-government negotiations with the governments of Canada and of the Northwest Territories are resolved. They urged that section 3 of the Charter must be read together with, and subject to, section 25 of the Charter and section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, which recognize aboriginal and treaty rights, and the process rights implicit in those sections.
On March 5, 1999, Mr. Justice de Weerdt held that the boundaries of three ridings violate the right to vote guaranteed by the Charter: The ridings of Hay River, Yellowknife North and Yellowknife South. The population of these ridings are each more than 25 percent higher than the average population of all of the ridings. The court declared that the parts of the Legislative Assembly and Executive Council Act that establish these ridings are invalid, "being wholly inconsistent with" section 3 of the Charter.
Mr. Justice de Weerdt rejected the arguments put forward by the intervenors that the status quo should be maintained until self-government and land claim agreements are concluded. He said that the right to vote is a right of citizenship that should not depend upon the leave of a government or be withheld during government negotiations. He did not accept that in these circumstances, section 3 of the Charter is qualified by section 25 of the Charter or by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.
Mr. Justice de Weerdt essentially accepted the rule established in other cases that an electoral district's population should not be more than 25 percent above the average district population. However, he did not rule invalid those ridings whose populations were more than 25 percent less than the average. He noted that the application was directed at remedying the under- representation of voters in Yellowknife, rather than reducing overrepresentation in less populated ridings. He was satisfied that the overrepresentation in ridings which have populations below the average is probably justified, considering the factors of geography, community history and interests, language differences, difficulties in communication with remote communities and minority representation and the difficulties and expense of travel.
Mr. Justice de Weerdt suspended his declaration, giving the Legislative Assembly until April 1, 1999, to replace or amend the invalid provisions to comply with section 3 of the Charter.
The Government of the Northwest Territories, with the concurrence of the Friends of Democracy and the intervenors, requested an extension of the time frame to allow it to implement an acceptable solution prior to the next general election. Justice de Weerdt varied his order to give the Legislative Assembly until September 1, 1999, to amend or replace the legislation.
Bill 15. The Government of the NWT, as the unsuccessful party to the court challenge, had the right to appeal the Supreme Court decision to the NWT Court of Appeal. The intervenors did not have an automatic right, but required leave of the court to appeal.
The Aboriginal Summit, among others, urged the GNWT to appeal, and argued that it had in fact a fiduciary duty to do so in order to protect the rights and interests of aboriginal people. The summit pointed out that the issues involved included the integrity of constitutional negotiations with aboriginal governments in the context of treaty, land, resources and governance negotiations. As well, it involved the appropriate role of the courts in ensuring that nothing be allowed to transpire that would frustrate the ability of the Crown to honour its commitments towards aboriginal people. The Aboriginal Summit said that for the government to fail to appeal would be to break faith with Northwest Territories aboriginal people, and to abdicate its responsibility to ensure that constitutional development of the NWT goes forward in compliance with the constitution read as a whole.
Members of the Legislative Assembly and the Aboriginal Summit recognized that time was running out in the life of the 13th Assembly, and that this limited the opportunity to develop creative solutions in full consultation with northern people. However, the government did have the option of requesting the federal government to amend the Northwest Territories Act to allow for a one year extension of the Assembly. The Government could then have requested a longer extension of the deadline imposed upon it by the NWT Supreme Court.
The government was urged to request an extension of the term of the Legislative Assembly by several Members and by the Aboriginal Summit. This would have demonstrated leadership, and would have allowed northern people to participate in the development of a political solution to the constitutional questions raised by the NWT Supreme Court decision. In the committee's view, it would have been a much more productive use of time and resources than other recent costly initiatives, such as the Economic Strategy Panel.
Despite the direction of the Legislative Assembly, the GNWT chose not to appeal the Supreme Court decision nor to request an extension of the term of the 13th Legislative Assembly.
The government indicated that its legal advice was that there were no grounds to appeal the decision. However, the government did commit to support the intervenors' application for leave to appeal, if the intervenors chose to proceed, and to assist with the legal costs. The Premier also informed the House, on March 26, 1999, that the legal advice received by the government was that the intervenors would have a good chance of being granted leave to appeal.
The same offer of support and financial assistance with respect to an appeal was also made to the Friends of Democracy.
The Government then introduced Bill 15, An Act to Amend the Legislative Assembly and Executive Council Act, on March 23, 1999. Bill 15 proposes to amend the legal descriptions of the electoral boundaries that are appended as a schedule to the Legislative Assembly and Executive Council Act, to create five additional ridings. Three of these would be in Yellowknife, one in Hay River and one in Inuvik. The bill also revises the electoral district of Deh Cho to include the community of Enterprise, as requested by that community.
As well, Bill 15 proposes to eliminate the ten electoral districts that are now part of Nunavut and make minor amendments to other riding descriptions to change the wording "Nunavut Settlement Area Boundary" to "Nunavut - Northwest Territories Boundary" to reflect Nunavut's now official status as a territory of Canada. If passed, the amendments made by Bill 15 will come into force when the 13th Assembly dissolves in the fall of 1999.
NWT Court of Appeal Decision. On May 5, 1999, the intervenors in the NWT Supreme Court case filed an application for leave to appeal and a notice of appeal of Justice de Weerdt's decision. All parties supported the intervenors' right to appeal.
The NWT Court of Appeal heard the matter on June 16, 1999, and denied the application for leave to appeal. The panel judges indicated that they had read all of the appeal material and that the intervenors had not established that they had any right that was violated by the NWT Supreme Court decision. If bona fide negotiations with respect to self-government and/or treaty negotiations do not continue, and section 25 or 35 rights are infringed, remedies will be available through the judicial process at that time. The Court of Appeal also found that the intervenors did not have a reasonably arguable appeal.
Mr. Speaker, I will have my colleague, Mr. Krutko, read the remaining report. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.