Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I think we should clarify something here. Although I am not as legally astute as my friend, Mr. Erasmus, the whole point of the questioning here today has brought out the fact that we are in circumvention of a bylaw. I did not say I was trying to impede the Legislative Assembly in breaking laws.
You have $500,000 here for pavement. As some people have mentioned earlier, you can make an easy decision $2 or $3 million in cutting programs and facilities. I think it is a good point for the people to see you are actually debating this issue. It is not being passed over. That is my point here. Is it people or pavement? It did not come before me in any of the committees I looked at that approved this. My final question is, if we did not pave it, can we take that $500,000 to allow for wheelchair access in the parking lots? If not, that is fine. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I would like to have some order here.