This is page numbers 1217 - 1274 of the Hansard for the 13th Assembly, 3rd Session. The original version can be accessed on the Legislative Assembly's website or by contacting the Legislative Assembly Library. The word of the day was community.

Topics

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1257

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you, the honourable member for Nunakput, Mr. Steen.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1257

Vince Steen

Vince Steen Nunakput

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman I would like now to follow up a little on the questions that Mr. Krutko was asking in regards to which group or body this government would recognize whereby we have a situation where both bodies would request to take on, let us say, social services? Which group, if we have a situation where we have a band

council, a hamlet council, a community corporation, which group would the government recognize as the one that would have the first option to take over this service?

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1258

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. Madam Minister.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1258

Manitok Thompson Aivilik

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I understand where the MLA is coming from. There are all different types of assessments that would be done before anything happens and I could just list that there are three types of assessments to be considered including self-assessment, GNWT assessment and joint assessment. During these assessments there would be a lot of consultation with the groups that are interested so, there would be..it does not happen overnight, this would take a lot of time, assessing who would be able to take on the program.

We are looking at a single administrative point that can be block funded or it can be, as I said up to three single administrative points, and they can have a choice of social programs and services, and infrastructure programs and services, economic resource programs and services. If there was a duplication of people wanting the same responsibility, it would have to go through the assessment team, and everything would be assessed first. We have quite an intensive assessment program that we would do. Thank you Mr. Chair.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1258

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. Mr. Steen.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1258

Vince Steen

Vince Steen Nunakput

Mr. Chairman, I guess what I am trying to get at here is, is there a body in the community that the government recognizes as the prime public body? We would have situations where the hamlet council, and say, the community corporation both want to take on a certain responsibility. I think this government has to come forward with a statement at some point in time, that for instance, is it the hamlet that would have the first option to take this responsibility. In the past, Mr. Chairman, groups that wanted to take on certain services or responsibilities, like for instance, the crisis centres or the alcohol centres, before they could receive funding they had to have a letter of support from the local hamlet council. Is this process still followed? That is my question. If for instance the community corporation wanted to take something on, would it require a letter from the hamlet council, for instance, in order to do so.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1258

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. Madam Minister.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1258

Manitok Thompson Aivilik

Thank you Mr. Chair. The first challenge we have as a department, is to try to get the community together, and that is a big challenge. I think if we can talk about the basic needs of the community, we should be able to accomplish that goal, but right now we are recognizing the municipal body as the first point of contact, but we have to talk to the other groups in the community, and get the whole community working together, and different organizations, in order to start up on this community empowerment initiative. The Hamlet would be taking the lead in the presentation, if they wanted to do that, but we are making ourselves available to the other groups in the community. The challenge we have in the department is that we have to get all the groups working together first, and get it co-ordinated after they start working together. Thank you Mr. Chair.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1258

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. General comments. Are there any further general comments? If not, do we agree that the matter under consideration, Tabled Document 90-13(3), and Tabled Document 91-13(3), are concluded.

---Agreed.

Following the recommendation from the Chairman from the ordinary Members caucus, we will go to Tabled Document 7-13(3), Social Programs Mid-Year Review Report. Agreed?

---Agreed.

Thank you. I would like to recognize the Chairman of the Standing Committee on Social Programs, Mr. Enuaraq.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1259

Tommy Enuaraq Baffin Central

Thank you Mr. Chairman. I would like to report on the review of the NWT Housing Corporation Mid-Year Status Report by the Standing Committee on Social Programs.

As part of the mid-year review, the Housing Corporation provided information on its restructuring. The committee reviewed the new organizational structure, and will look at it further during the 1997/98 business plan review.

In reviewing the structure, the committee wanted to see that the services are delivered as close to communities as possible. The committee is aware that the amalgamation of the Corporation with Public Works and Services and Transportation is being considered.

While some of the work of the corporation is related to infrastructure development and maintenance, there is another side to the work the corporation is doing. In many ways, the Corporation's mandate to provide social housing is a key component in our social safety net. Co-ordination with the programs like income reform is crucial. With these considerations as well as the transfer of Housing as part of community empowerment, the committee will be looking closely at any proposal to ensure the social program component of the Corporation is recognized and maintained.

Therefore I move that the committee recommends that no implementation of this amalgamation should proceed until all ordinary Members have a chance to review the proposal and debate its merits, regardless of whether the Corporation is being restructured or amalgamated with other departments.

Members believe that the organization's structure could provide more support directly at the community level. There are still many staff at the district level who are supposed to provide community support and development. The committee suggests it is difficult to do community development in Fort Resolution if you work in Hay River, just as it is difficult to do community development in Cape Dorset if you are based in Iqaluit. The committee would like to see a plan to have more district staff working directly in the communities. This plan should address the differences between the program and technical sides of the Corporation, training needs and the issue of duplication of services, LHOs versus district staff.

Housing is one of the areas being considered by many communities as part of empowerment. The committee believes that there is need for appropriate support as communities assume responsibility for the local housing authorities. At the community and territorial level, integration of housing services with other initiatives in the social envelope is crucial. This must be reflected in any program transfers to communities. There has been a change in the way local housing authorities are funded. The new arrangements provide incentives to authorities which find more effective ways of doing business, and able to save money. The committee supports this approach which rewards those who are effective and efficient in how they do their business.

The Housing Corporation is currently running four pilot projects for panel-built homes. These projects are consistent for new and innovative approaches to address our housing shortage. If the results of these pilot projects are positive, the committee encourages the Corporation to promote this panel construction with the view to having the panels made in the north.

Over the past year, committee members have had concerns with utility costs and public housing. The committee asked the Corporation to prepare analysis of utility costs, with the view to identifying problem areas and solutions. This analysis was provided to the committee during the review and was very enlightening for both the Corporation and the Members. While there are certainly individuals living in public housing who are not careful in their utility use, the average public housing consumption is either consistent with, or lower than the average usage in private housing. The difference in costs seems to come from the higher government rate the Corporation has to pay for utilities.

The analysis provided was very well done, and should help the Corporation identify the true areas of concern and develop appropriate solutions.

I now would like to ask Mr. Roland to continue our report.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1260

The Chair John Ningark

Mr. Enuaraq, during your presentation here, did you intend to make a motion here. I believe that the recommendation that you read, was already made in the form of a motion. You stated "therefore I move that the committee recommends that no implementation of this amalgamation should proceed until all ordinary Members have a chance to review the proposal and debate its merits." Did you intend to make that a motion? Thank you.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1260

Tommy Enuaraq Baffin Central

No, Mr. Chairman.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1260

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you, Mr. Enuaraq. Mr. Roland.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1260

Floyd Roland

Floyd Roland Inuvik

Thank you Mr. Chairman. I will report on the Department of Education, Culture and Employment.

The Department of Education, Culture and Employment proposed a number of initiatives in its Business Plan. Based on the information provided during the mid-year report, the department is moving forward on these projects consistent with the directions approved by the Standing Committee.

The Committee was disappointed that the early intervention initiative is slightly behind schedule. One of the best ways to relieve the stresses on our social programs is through prevention and early intervention. Early intervention is productive, not just for the children and families involved, but also for the network of people who deal with children with difficulties, such as teachers, nurses, and court workers. Members encourage the department to continue with the planning phase and get early intervention programs up and running in our communities.

The issue of an NWT job strategy was raised with the Minister. He suggested the Labour Force Plan could be considered a summary of the various job strategies that the government is involved with. If this is the case, and there is a job strategy within the department, Members would like to see this pulled together in a way that people can see it. They want to know if the Minister is just referring to training and pre-employment, or a true job strategy, which would address affirmative action among other things.

Members had a particular interest in the mining training project. The government is working with Aurora College to establish programs to train northerners for jobs in the mining industry.

There was also a job shadow program over the summer which trained twenty-two students. The committee will be monitoring this initiative in the hopes that it will provide northerners with the skills to participate in mining development.

While the Committee was pleased to see the initiatives in the mining areas, Members were concerned with what seems to be a piecemeal approach to date. As the Minister indicated, their is significant opportunity for employment within the mining sector, not just in the future, but now. Currently, there are 150 vacancies in mining operations every year. The longer we wait for the government to develop training programs, the more jobs are lost. There are many people in our communities who could take some of these 150 jobs a year, if they had the training.

As part of the work through Aurora College, the committee suggests the department consider establishing a mining institute, which could train northerners for the opportunities already here, and those yet to come.

My colleague, Mr. Miltenberger, will now continue our report.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1261

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. The Member for Thebacha, Mr. Miltenberger.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1261

Michael Miltenberger

Michael Miltenberger Thebacha

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I would like to provide our report on the Mid-Year Status Review of the Department of Health and Social Services.

The committee appreciated the candour of the Minister and the department in providing a clear picture of the reductions proposed and the lack of success of the department in meeting many of the reduction targets. This openness allowed a free discussion of issues and concerns.

The Department has indicated they are short of their target by almost $9 million. When the Business Plan was provided to the committee in January, Members expressed a concern about the ability of the Department to achieve what seemed to be a very ambitious slate of reductions and changes. Significant slippage to what the department proposed in medical travel reductions the previous year, added to the concerns of the committee. At the time, the Minister and his staff reassured the Members that the department had greatly improved the quality of their analysis and information they used to make their decisions. They indicated that while there may have been superficial analysis in the past, that was no longer the case. Despite reservations the Committee approved the reduction options and gave direction regarding the need for a coordinated approach between some of the options. The Mid Year Report demonstrates that there is a still a problem with the quality of analysis carried out by the department when reviewing options and program changes. This is an area which the Committee considers very serious and hopes that the Minister and his staff will make efforts to correct. As you make more difficult decisions over the next year, the Committee must be able to have confidence in the information provided. The Mid Year Report talked a lot about planning and studying. In most cases there are no time lines attached to projects to indicate when planning will finish and action will begin.

In reviewing past reports of the Assembly, the department has always done many studies and plans. The Committee is concerned that it is time to move out of the planning mode and into the implementation mode. The Committee is under the assumption that the department's business plan was sustainable. Members are concerned that this is apparently not the case. The department indicated that additional work would be required before sustainable plans could be developed. The department also indicated they are not receiving quarterly reports from the Health Boards. If the business plans are not sustainable and there is no regular accountability from the Boards who receive a large portion of the department's budget, the Committee questions the validity of the department's next business plan which we expect to review in a few weeks.

The department is supposed to be a leader in community wellness. However, there is a lack of clarity about what the department means by community wellness. Members question how communities can be expected to use community action fund dollars to develop community wellness plans when the Minister has defined community wellness as a state of being we aim to achieve. When we are talking about community wellness, communities want and need something concrete and practical. As the Committee has stated before, this does not mean the government should tell communities what to do. What government must provide is a clear framework so communities understand the scope of what they can consider.

During the business plan review, the Committee had recommended that the department look at a new approach to alcohol and drug treatment since the current approach does not seem to be particularly successful. Part of this was looking at the roles of the alcohol and drug treatment facilities in the N.W.T. Members recognize that these facilities have not always been used to full capacity in the past. The Committee felt the new funding arrangement was intended in part to encourage facilities to increase occupancy. The new formula provides for some core funding. Facilities can then receive per diem rates up to 100% of the old core funding. With the upper limit capped, members questioned how this encourages facilities to have full occupancy and the additional cost for staff and supplies that go along with more use.

When discussing capital, members questioned the Minister about changes to two proposed health centre replacements. They were concerned about why fund were moved from one project to another. There were also questions about the capital planning process and how priorities could change in the short period from passing the capital budget to when the changes were made in the summer. Members listened carefully to the Minister's explanation for the changes including the involvement of mayors and councils from the affected communities.

Without clear guidelines regarding changes to the capital plan, the Minister was forced to make a decision based, in part, on subjective factors. The Committee hopes that the new policy on capital changes will assist Ministers in making objective choices in consultation with the Corporate Member in Standing Committee.

Mr. Erasmus will now complete the Report of the Standing Committee on Social Programs.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1262

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you Mr. Miltenberger. Mr. Erasmus.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1262

Roy Erasmus Yellowknife North

Thank you Mr. Chairman. I will give the report of the Standing Committee on the Department of Justice.

The key initiative in reviewing the Mid Year Activity Report of this department was community justice. It is clear from overcrowding in our correctional facilities that the current approach to dealing with those who break the law is not working. Members see electronic monitoring as a possible solution -- sorry Mr. Chairman -- I do not know how that word slipped in there -- it should read -- Members see community justice as a possible solution. Unfortunately, the department has not been able to provide a clear framework for community justice to the Committee.

As with community wellness,

-- Laughter.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1262

The Chair John Ningark

We will take a momentary pause here. I believe there is something stuck in the Member's throat, so we will take a few minutes. Tell me when you are ready - signal when you are ready. Okay, Mr. Erasmus.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1262

Roy Erasmus Yellowknife North

Thank you Mr. Chairman. As I was saying. As with community wellness, Members believe that while the government should not tell communities how to do community justice, there must be a concrete and practical framework for communities to use as a starting point.

The Committee was pleased to hear about the success of two programs which increased the participation of Northerners in local policing. There was a very successful community constable project with the RCMP where more than 20 by-law officers from across the North received training at RCMP Training Headquarters in Regina. These officers will now provide back-up to the RCMP in their communities. In Yellowknife, civilians were sworn in as auxiliary police to assist the police in specific areas. This again seems to be very successful and hopefully can be implemented in some of the other large communities.

One of the reduction options presented by the department during the business plan was eliminating inmate pay. After it was approved by a Standing Committee, the Minister decided to place this reduction on hold. During the Mid Year Review, the Minister indicated first, that there was 50% reduction to inmate pay, then later that there was no change to inmate pay. The Committee would like clarification of what is happening with inmate pay.

Mr. Chairman, this concludes the Report of the Standing Committee on Social Programs.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1263

The Chair John Ningark

I would like to thank members of the Social Program Committee for making the presentation. Do we have any general comments with regards to the Tabled Document 7-13(3)? - Committee Report - correction. Mr. Todd.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1263

John Todd Keewatin Central

Thank you Mr. Chairman. On behalf of the Cabinet and FMB we appreciate the cooperative language in this report and the recommendations. It demonstrates that this Committee is committed to working with the Cabinet and the Minister to reach consensus on important issues.

Mr. Chairman, we want to conclude tomorrow do we? On issues that affect all our people. The recommendations have been noted and a coordinated response will be developed as in the past by FMB and forwarded to the appropriate Committees. Thank you.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1263

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. Are there any other concerns? If not, do we agree that Committee Report 7-13(3) is concluded? Mr. Steen.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1263

Vince Steen

Vince Steen Nunakput

Mr. Chairman, I note that the Report from Justice ends with a question.

I would like clarification on that as well. I believe the question is, the Minister indicated first there was a 50 percent reduction to inmate pay and then later there was no change to inmate pay. The Committee would like clarification as to what is happening with inmate pay.

Could the Minister indicate to the Committee what is happening with inmate pay.

Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters

Page 1263

The Chair John Ningark

Thank you. The Chair will recognize the Minister of Finance and Chairperson of the Financial Management Board, Mr. Todd.