Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, I have comments in regard to Footprints in New Snow 2, as well as, comments in regard to Partnerships for a New Beginning. Mr. Chairman, I have concerns about this government working against the intended end results of Footprints 2. By that, I mean there are some programs or cuts to programs, cuts to staff, cuts to or establishment of regional levels of board that seem to be contradictory to what is suggested in Footprints 2. Personally, I would favour that we would somehow work towards making it easier for the Nunavut government to actually be established and in place by 1999, by perhaps following closer to what Footprints 2 suggests. I realize that we have made commitments towards balancing the budget, but I am not sure that I would favour balancing the budget as a priority over establishing and working towards Footprints 2. I appreciate that this is kind of contradictory to each other, these two items. But I think that we are going to have to try to work towards how we can address that issue.
I believe strongly that the Nunavut people have the right to determine their own style and form of government structure. I think that we should, if at all possible, work towards assisting them in this. I am not in favour of making expenditures that would, in the end, see the Nunavut government have to undo or redo what we, in fact, did for them. Sometimes, if you look at it, one document suggests that they need 580 positions down there in Nunavut. On the other hand, we see ourselves laying off staff. It almost looks like it is one working against the other. I would like to see that addressed by our government. I am not sure that we can do it, but possibly, at least we should get some indication from the government that they did try to accommodate Footprints 2 as much as possible, and still have a balanced budget.
My other concern in regards to Footprints 2, is that, I am hoping that the Finance Minister of this government would work towards some way of addressing the incremental and transition costs that are associated with this document. That way, we can cut down any possibility of animosity or east versus west in this House. Because, definitely it would happen if we do not have that particular funding identified.
In regards to Partnerships in a New Beginning, along with everybody else, I realize that this is not the end result of this effort. But at the same time, there must be some weight placed on what this document does reflect up to now. From my perspective, this document is a reflection of all the distrust between all the native groups and the non-aboriginals. It reflects the fact that the native groups see themselves as having to have this type of government in order to protect themselves from the non-aboriginals. I do not believe that this is related just to this era. It is related to how native people have been treated for a long time. It is going to take a major effort, not only on the part of this government, but on the part of the native groups and the federal government, to address this situation.
Because, like it or not, the federal government has to realize that they in fact, went a long ways towards instigating this whole process, and distrust amongst the people, by not having the proper safeguards there in the first place. As a matter of fact, this all leads to the native people establishing land claims to protect themselves. I believe that if the end result of this document or this effort is going to be long serving, and serve the territories for a long time, I come back to my same statement that I made last spring, that is, there can only be one type of document that could actually treat everybody equally, and that document would have to colour blind.
You cannot have special rights in order for everybody to feel equally represented, and equal opportunities. The federal government, I believe, is responsible for addressing the distrust between the two groups, and I believe that particular thing has to be addressed separately from a constitution. I do not believe it should be reflected in the constitution. It is a nice effort, and this would be a nice thought that if we could do this, but I think that by the time we have come up with that form of document, we will be somewhere in the year 2050 before we ever have a document that would reflect the trust that is needed.
My other comment is in regards to the process leading up to the development of this Partnership in New Beginnings. I must say that when we had the presentation last summer, or last fall, in the Great Hall here, I was very disappointed to see no reflection of the fact that the Inuvialuit were a partner to this group. The Inuvialuit do not live in teepees. There was no reflection at all of the Inuvialuit culture in the presentation last fall. None. Yet, we own one-fifth of this new territory. There was no reflection of that. More care should be taken in the future, because it could very well reflect on us, as to how we will be treated in the future, if you do not respect us enough to show a reflection of us at those presentations. We expect that is how we will be treated in the future. I think maybe it was just an oversight, but it is a serious oversight. I am also a little disappointed that Partnerships in a New Beginning was not translated into Inuktitut, to allow Nunavut people to make comments towards the thing, the same as we make comments towards Footprints 2. If it is not translated into Inuktitut, we cannot expect them to be able to read it. I am a little disappointed in that fact.
I have worked towards the eventual establishment of some form of constitution that, hopefully, we will input into making by the time our term is up, rather than the federal government doing it for us, but at the present time, I do not believe that with the present attitude of the present members, we are ever going to get towards that goal. I do not like hearing comments, whether they are in public or in private, that the quicker Nunavut is gone, the better. Because I believe that we are going to be the next one, the Inuvialuit will probably be the next ones. I do not like hearing those comments. They do not do anything towards making us work together. I think that with a more serious and more trustworthy approach to this whole thing, rather than poking a poke to the native groups, we could probably get somewhere. On the other hand, I believe also that the native groups have to realize that they do not own this territory any more in total. In the past, we did. But we cannot bring back the past, we have to deal in today's issues, and today's reality is that we are also populated by non-aboriginals. We have to take that into consideration if we are going to have a new constitution.
I am disappointed with the amount of money that is being spent on this document, knowing that it did not have much of a future. I would have hoped that the money would have been better spent. I hope I am not reflecting on any particular MLA or minister. I just feel that in the time frame, the amount of rushing that went on, we were put into a situation where we had to come up with something fast, and we, therefore, came up with a document that we knew the public could not support. I must say I am disappointed in that manner. But I am in favour of working towards an end result, and hopefully, this time the federal government will see fit to come in at an early stage, and actually work with us, not leave it us totally to draw up a constitution. I think they should be working with us to draw up a constitution that would serve all the people of the territories, including Nunakput. Thank you.